Literature DB >> 30232583

"Reproducible" Research in Mathematical Sciences Requires Changes in our Peer Review Culture and Modernization of our Current Publication Approach.

Santiago Schnell1,2.   

Abstract

The nature of scientific research in mathematical and computational biology allows editors and reviewers to evaluate the findings of a scientific paper. Replication of a research study should be the minimum standard for judging its scientific claims and considering it for publication. This requires changes in the current peer review practice and a strict adoption of a replication policy similar to those adopted in experimental fields such as organic synthesis. In the future, the culture of replication can be easily adopted by publishing papers through dynamic computational notebooks combining formatted text, equations, computer algebra and computer code.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic publishing; Editorial policies; Repeatability; Replicability; Reproducibility

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30232583      PMCID: PMC6240027          DOI: 10.1007/s11538-018-0500-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  44 in total

1.  Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals.

Authors:  Marjan Bakker; Jelte M Wicherts
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-09

3.  The CellML Model Repository.

Authors:  Catherine M Lloyd; James R Lawson; Peter J Hunter; Poul F Nielsen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Reproducible research and Biostatistics.

Authors:  Roger D Peng
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

6.  Before reproducibility must come preproducibility.

Authors:  Philip B Stark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Multi-scale modeling of tissues using CompuCell3D.

Authors:  Maciej H Swat; Gilberto L Thomas; Julio M Belmonte; Abbas Shirinifard; Dimitrij Hmeljak; James A Glazier
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 9.  A comprehensive review of genetic association studies.

Authors:  Joel N Hirschhorn; Kirk Lohmueller; Edward Byrne; Kurt Hirschhorn
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Lawrence A Tabak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  To Sobol or not to Sobol? The effects of sampling schemes in systems biology applications.

Authors:  Marissa Renardy; Louis R Joslyn; Jess A Millar; Denise E Kirschner
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.935

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.