Literature DB >> 30230375

A comparative assessment of bracket survival and adhesive removal time using flash-free or conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.

Thorsten Grünheid, Brent E Larson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare bracket survival and adhesive removal time between a flash-free and a conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients had their maxillary incisors, canines, and premolars bonded with ceramic brackets using a flash-free adhesive (APC Flash-Free Adhesive, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) on one side and a conventional adhesive (APCII Adhesive, 3M Unitek) on the other side. The side allocation was randomized. Bracket failure was recorded at 4-week intervals. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was scored on debond and adhesive removal timed to the nearest second. The primary outcome was adhesive removal time per quadrant. Secondary outcomes were bracket failure rate, time to first-time failure of a bracket, and ARI score on debond. Paired t-tests were used to compare adhesive removal times and ARI scores between the adhesives with P < .05 considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Bracket failure rates were 4.3% for the flash-free adhesive and 1.9% for the conventional adhesive, with mean times to first-time failure of 31 weeks for the flash-free adhesive and 42 weeks for the conventional adhesive; neither failure rates nor times to first failure were significantly different. Although the flash-free adhesive left significantly more adhesive on the tooth surface after debonding, the adhesive removal times were 22.2% shorter than with the conventional adhesive.
CONCLUSIONS: Bracket survival with the flash-free adhesive was equivalent to the conventional adhesive when ceramic brackets were bonded. Adhesive removal was significantly faster when using the flash-free adhesive, which may result in time savings of more than 20% compared with the conventional adhesive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adhesive; Adhesive removal time; Bonding; Bracket survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30230375      PMCID: PMC8120881          DOI: 10.2319/030918-195.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  19 in total

1.  Remnant amount and cleanup for 3 adhesives after debracketing.

Authors:  Valerie A David; Robert N Staley; Harold F Bigelow; Jane R Jakobsen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  An in vivo evaluation of bond failure rates with hydrophilic and self-etching primer systems.

Authors:  Julio Pedra Cal-Neto; José Augusto Mendes Miguel
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2005-12

3.  Bond strength of direct and indirect bonded brackets after thermocycling.

Authors:  Jacob Daub; David W Berzins; Brandon James Linn; Thomas Gerard Bradley
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Adhesive pre-coated brackets, a comparative clinical study.

Authors:  S Ash; N Hay
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1996-11

5.  Comparison of shear bond strength and bonding time of a novel flash-free bonding system.

Authors:  Moonyoung Lee; Georgios Kanavakis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets with Different Base Designs: Comparative In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Mohd Younus Ansari; Deepak K Agarwal; Ankur Gupta; Preeti Bhattacharya; Juhi Ansar; Ravi Bhandari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

7.  An evaluation of shear strength measurements of unfilled and filled resin combinations.

Authors:  K Moin; I L Dogon
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1978-11

8.  A comparative study of three etching solutions. Effects on contact angle, rate of etching and tensile bond strength.

Authors:  D H Retief
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  A Mavropoulos; A Karamouzos; G Kolokithas; A E Athanasiou
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2003-06

10.  Bond failure rates with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Julio Pedra e Cal-Neto; Cátia Abdo Quintão; Marco Antônio de Oliveira Almeida; José Augusto Mendes Miguel
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  8 in total

1.  Enamel around orthodontic brackets coated with flash-free and conventional adhesives.

Authors:  Mohamed Tarek ElSherifa; Marwa Sameh Shamaa; Mona A Montasser
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Comparison of flash-free and conventional bonding systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  He Wang; Ge Feng; Bo Hu; Haonan Tian; Yunchun Kuang; Tingwei Zhang; Jinlin Song
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.684

3.  Effect of a single-component ceramic conditioner on shear bond strength of precoated brackets to different CAD/CAM materials.

Authors:  Carlos González-Serrano; Jin-Ho Phark; María Victoria Fuentes; Alberto Albaladejo; Andrés Sánchez-Monescillo; Sillas Duarte; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Factors influencing treatment efficiency.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Effects of adhesive flash-free brackets on debonding pain and time: A randomized split-mouth clinical trial.

Authors:  Serpil Çokakoğlu; Ayten Tan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Effects of adhesive flash-free brackets on enamel demineralization and periodontal status.

Authors:  Ayten Tan; Serpil Çokakoğlu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Risk Factors of Composite Attachment Loss in Orthodontic Patients during Orthodontic Clear Aligner Therapy: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Chen Yaosen; A M Mohamed; Wang Jinbo; Zheng Ziwei; Maher Al-Balaa; Yang Yan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Shear bond strength of a flash-free orthodontic adhesive system after thermal aging procedure.

Authors:  Carlos González-Serrano; Eugenia Baena; María-Victoria Fuentes; Alberto Albaladejo; Manuel Míguez-Contreras; Manuel O Lagravère; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-02-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.