Literature DB >> 32696069

Enamel around orthodontic brackets coated with flash-free and conventional adhesives.

Mohamed Tarek ElSherifa1, Marwa Sameh Shamaa1, Mona A Montasser2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate enamel roughness and color after debonding flash-free adhesive precoated brackets and brackets coated with conventional orthodontic adhesives using nonbonded enamel as control.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 extracted human premolars were divided into the following four groups: group I: APCTM Flash-Free adhesive precoated brackets; group II: APCTM PLUS adhesive precoated brackets; group III: noncoated brackets, which were coated manually at the time of bonding (all three brackets were ClarityTM Advanced ceramic brackets [3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA]); group IV: nonbonded enamel (control). Bonded premolars were subjected to demineralization, and then brackets were debonded. Each group was then divided into two subgroups to assess enamel around the debonded brackets, and also enamel in the control group, using an atomic force microscope and spectrophotometer. In addition, 12 samples were used to assess the bracket/adhesive/enamel junction with a scanning electron microscope.
RESULTS: Mean values of root mean square roughness (Rq) and maximum profile valley depth (Rv) for APCTM Flash-Free, APCTM PLUS, and ClarityTM Advanced groups were 140 nm and 482 nm, 210 nm and 727 nm, and 447 nm and 1243 nm, respectively. All three groups showed higher roughness and depth values than the control enamel. Spectrophotometer results yielded ∆E* of 3.7 ± 0.6, 5.1 ± 0.4, and 7.1 ± 0.6 for APC™ Flash-Free, APC™ PLUS, and ClarityTM Advanced groups respectively. Color coordinates showed progressively higher L* and b* values and progressively lower a* values from group I to group III.
CONCLUSIONS: Under the same demineralization conditions, enamel around debonded APC™ Flash-Free adhesive precoated brackets showed less roughness and color changes compared to the other two groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthodontic treatment; Scanning electron microscope; Spectrophotometer; Tooth demineralization; White spots

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32696069     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-020-00241-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  24 in total

1.  A new flash-free orthodontic adhesive system: A first clinical and stereomicroscopic study.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Christian Schuster; Roman K Rahimi; Heinrich Wehrbein; Collin Jacobs
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Bond strength of pre-coated flash-free adhesive ceramic brackets. An in vitro comparative study on the second mandibular premolars.

Authors:  Maria-Gabriela Marc; Cédric Bazert; Jean-Pierre Attal
Journal:  Int Orthod       Date:  2018-07-10

3.  A comparative assessment of bracket survival and adhesive removal time using flash-free or conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Thorsten Grünheid; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Microleakage under ceramic flash-free orthodontic brackets after thermal cycling.

Authors:  Julia Kim; Georgios Kanavakis; Matthew D Finkelman; Moonyoung Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Incidence of white spot lesions among patients treated with clear aligners and traditional braces.

Authors:  Peter H Buschang; David Chastain; Cameron L Keylor; Doug Crosby; Katie C Julien
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Nanosilver coated orthodontic brackets: in vivo antibacterial properties and ion release.

Authors:  Gamze Metin-Gürsoy; Lale Taner; Gülçin Akca
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A practice-based evaluation of the prevalence and predisposing etiology of white spot lesions.

Authors:  Matthew D Brown; Phillip M Campbell; Emet D Schneiderman; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Prevalence of white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Katie C Julien; Peter H Buschang; Phillip M Campbell
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  In vitro properties of orthodontic adhesives with fluoride or amorphous calcium phosphate.

Authors:  Clara Ka Wai Chow; Christine D Wu; Carla A Evans
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-09-06

10.  Comparative assessment of bonding time and 1-year bracket survival using flash-free and conventional adhesives for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Thorsten Grünheid; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of flash-free and conventional bonding systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  He Wang; Ge Feng; Bo Hu; Haonan Tian; Yunchun Kuang; Tingwei Zhang; Jinlin Song
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.684

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.