Literature DB >> 30228897

Individual invitation letters lead to significant increase in attendance for screening colonoscopies: Results of a pilot study in Northern Hesse, Germany.

K Stratmann1, H Bock2, N Filmann3, P Fister2, C Weber2, W Tacke2, B Simonis2, M Höftmann4, O Schröder5, J Hausmann1, S Zeuzem1, I Blumenstein1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer in Germany. Screening colonoscopies are considered an effective tool for early detection and prevention of CRC and are recommended in Germany for citizens over the age of 55. To increase the participation rate for screening colonoscopies, an invitation procedure was initiated in parts of Germany for patients between the ages of 55 and 75 who had never undergone a screening colonoscopy before.
METHODS: We examined the number of participating patients before, during, and after the invitation procedure and compared the number of the participating patients who received a cover letter with the participating patients from the control group. Additionally, we classified the findings of the colonoscopies including CRC, advanced adenomas, and polyps.
RESULTS: During the invitation period, the participation rate of the invitation group increased from 220 patients to 531 patients compared to 1256 to 1693 in the control group. The increase was significantly greater in patients with cover letters (+141% vs.+35%, p < 0.0001). Also, significantly more polyps and adenomas were found in patients from the invitation letter group (254 (+102%) vs. 679 (-9%), p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study clearly indicates that personal invitation letters are an effective measure to increase overall participation rates in screening colonoscopies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Screening colonoscopy; advanced adenomas; colorectal cancer; invitation procedure; participation rate

Year:  2018        PMID: 30228897      PMCID: PMC6137580          DOI: 10.1177/2050640618769713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  34 in total

1.  Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  Polly A Newcomb; Barry E Storer; Libby M Morimoto; Allyson Templeton; John D Potter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  [Methods to increase participation in cancer screening programmes].

Authors:  Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Laura Camilloni; Carla Cogo; Antonio Federici; Eliana Ferroni; Giacomo Furnari; Livia Giordano; Grazia Grazzini; Anna Iossa; Beatriz Jimenez; Mauro Palazzi; Fabio Palazzo; Teresa Spadea; Carlo Senore; Piero Borgia; Gabriella Guasticchi
Journal:  Epidemiol Prev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.901

3.  Should Screening Colonoscopy Be Offered From Age 50?

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Nadine Zwink; Leopold Ludwig; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Screening for Bowel Cancer: Increasing Participation via Personal Invitation.

Authors:  Michael Hoffmeister; Bernd Holleczek; Nadine Zwink; Christian Stock; Christa Stegmaier; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  [Early detection of colonic cancer in the National Cancer Program--present status and recommendations].

Authors:  J F Riemann; C Maar; M Betzler; H Brenner; T Sauerbruch
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Nereo Segnan; Carlo Senore; Bruno Andreoni; Alberto Azzoni; Luigi Bisanti; Alessandro Cardelli; Guido Castiglione; Cristiano Crosta; Andrea Ederle; Alberto Fantin; Arnaldo Ferrari; Mario Fracchia; Franco Ferrero; Stefano Gasperoni; Serafino Recchia; Mauro Risio; Tiziana Rubeca; Giorgio Saracco; Marco Zappa
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Low risk of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas more than 10 years after negative colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Ulrike Haug; Volker Arndt; Christa Stegmaier; Lutz Altenhofen; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  The changing distribution of large intestinal cancer.

Authors:  J Mamazza; P H Gordon
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Elizabeth A Glowinski; Ching Lin-Cooper; Gregory N Larkin; James D Rogge; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of an educational telephone intervention strategy to improve non-screening colonoscopy attendance: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Agustín Seoane; Xènia Font; Juan C Pérez; Rocío Pérez; Carlos F Enriquez; Miriam Parrilla; Faust Riu; Josep M Dedeu; Luis E Barranco; Xavier Duran; Inés A Ibáñez; Marco A Álvarez
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.