Literature DB >> 30228793

Enzymatic Conversion of Sugar Beet Pulp: A Comparison of Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation and Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation for Lactic Acid Production.

Joanna Berlowska1, Weronika Cieciura-Włoch1, Halina Kalinowska2, Dorota Kregiel1, Sebastian Borowski1, Ewelina Pawlikowska1, Michał Binczarski3, Izabela Witonska3.   

Abstract

This study compares the efficiency of lactic acid production by separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) or simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of sugar beet pulp, a byproduct of industrial sugar production. In experiments, sugar beet pulp was hydrolyzed using five commercial enzymes. A series of shake flask fermentations were conducted using five selected strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The differences in the activities of the enzymes for degrading the principal sugar beet pulp components were reflected in the different yields of total reducing sugars. The highest yields after hydrolysis and the lowest quantities of insoluble residues were obtained using a mixture (1:1) of Viscozyme® and Ultraflo® Max. In the SHF process, only a portion of the soluble sugars released by the enzymes from the sugar beet pulp was assimilated by the LAB strains. In SSF, low enzyme loads led to reduction in the efficiency of sugar accumulation. The risk of carbon catabolic repression was reduced. Our results suggest that SSF has advantages over SHF, including lower processing costs and higher productivity. Lactic acid yield in SSF mode (approx. 30 g/L) was 80-90% higher than that in SHF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enzymatic hydrolysis; lactic acid; sugar beet pulp

Year:  2018        PMID: 30228793      PMCID: PMC6117997          DOI: 10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1330-9862            Impact factor:   3.918


  23 in total

Review 1.  Lactic acid production from lignocellulose-derived sugars using lactic acid bacteria: overview and limits.

Authors:  Mohamed Ali Abdel-Rahman; Yukihiro Tashiro; Kenji Sonomoto
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Production of D-lactic acid from defatted rice bran by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation.

Authors:  Takaaki Tanaka; Masahiro Hoshina; Suguru Tanabe; Kenji Sakai; Sadami Ohtsubo; Masayuki Taniguchi
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Comparison of separate hydrolysis and fermentation and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation processes for ethanol production from wheat straw by recombinant Escherichia coli strain FBR5.

Authors:  Badal C Saha; Nancy N Nichols; Nasib Qureshi; Michael A Cotta
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Enzymatic hydrolysis of ammonia-treated sugar beet pulp.

Authors:  B L Foster; B E Dale; J B Doran-Peterson
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.926

5.  Lactic acid production from corn stover using mixed cultures of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus brevis.

Authors:  Fengjie Cui; Yebo Li; Caixia Wan
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Effect of enzymatic pretreatment on anaerobic co-digestion of sugar beet pulp silage and vinasse.

Authors:  Krzysztof Ziemiński; Monika Kowalska-Wentel
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  Comparison of SHF and SSF processes from steam-exploded wheat straw for ethanol production by xylose-fermenting and robust glucose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Elia Tomás-Pejó; Jose M Oliva; Mercedes Ballesteros; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Fermentative production of lactic acid from renewable materials: recent achievements, prospects, and limits.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Yukihiro Tashiro; Kenji Sonomoto
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Sugar Beet Pulp for Efficient Bioethanol Production.

Authors:  Joanna Berłowska; Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska; Maria Balcerek; Urszula Dziekońska-Kubczak; Piotr Patelski; Piotr Dziugan; Dorota Kręgiel
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Co-Utilization of Glucose and Xylose for Enhanced Lignocellulosic Ethanol Production with Reverse Membrane Bioreactors.

Authors:  Mofoluwake M Ishola; Päivi Ylitervo; Mohammad J Taherzadeh
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-03
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Valorization of sugar beet pulp through biotechnological approaches: recent developments.

Authors:  Pradeep Puligundla; Chulkyoon Mok
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  Combined Yeast Cultivation and Pectin Hydrolysis as an Effective Method of Producing Prebiotic Animal Feed from Sugar Beet Pulp.

Authors:  Agnieszka Wilkowska; Joanna Berlowska; Adriana Nowak; Ilona Motyl; Aneta Antczak-Chrobot; Maciej Wojtczak; Alina Kunicka-Styczyńska; Michał Binczarski; Piotr Dziugan
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-05-06

Review 3.  Debaryomyces hansenii: an old acquaintance for a fresh start in the era of the green biotechnology.

Authors:  Clara Navarrete; Mònica Estrada; José L Martínez
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.253

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.