Literature DB >> 21968655

Comparison of separate hydrolysis and fermentation and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation processes for ethanol production from wheat straw by recombinant Escherichia coli strain FBR5.

Badal C Saha1, Nancy N Nichols, Nasib Qureshi, Michael A Cotta.   

Abstract

Ethanol production by recombinant Escherichia coli strain FBR5 from dilute acid pretreated wheat straw (WS) by separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) was studied. The yield of total sugars from dilute acid (0.5% H(2)SO(4)) pretreated (160 °C, 10 min) and enzymatically saccharified (pH 5.0, 45 °C, 72 h) WS (86 g/l) was 50.0 ± 1.4 g/l. The hydrolyzate contained 1,184 ± 19 mg furfural and 161 ± 1 mg hydroxymethyl furfural per liter. The recombinant E. coli FBR5 could not grow at all at pH controlled at 4.5 to 6.5 in the non-abated wheat straw hydrolyzate (WSH) at 35 °C. However, it produced 21.9 ± 0.3 g ethanol from non-abated WSH (total sugars, 44.1 ± 0.4 g/l) in 90 h including the lag time of 24 h at controlled pH 7.0 and 35 °C. The bioabatement of WS was performed by growing Coniochaeta ligniaria NRRL 30616 in the liquid portion of the pretreated WS aerobically at pH 6.5 and 30 °C for 15 h. The bacterium produced 21.6 ± 0.5 g ethanol per liter in 40 h from the bioabated enzymatically saccharified WSH (total sugars, 44.1 ± 0.4 g) at pH 6.0. It produced 24.9 ± 0.3 g ethanol in 96 h and 26.7 ± 0.0 g ethanol in 72 h per liter from bioabated WSH by batch SSF and fed-batch SSF, respectively. SSF offered a distinct advantage over SHF with respect to reducing total time required to produce ethanol from the bioabated WS. Also, fed-batch SSF performed better than the batch SSF with respect to shortening the time requirement and increase in ethanol yield. © Springer-Verlag (outside the USA) 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21968655     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3600-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

Review 1.  Ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass by recombinant Escherichia coli strain FBR5.

Authors:  Badal Saha; Michael A Cotta
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.269

2.  Enzymatic Conversion of Sugar Beet Pulp: A Comparison of Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation and Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation for Lactic Acid Production.

Authors:  Joanna Berlowska; Weronika Cieciura-Włoch; Halina Kalinowska; Dorota Kregiel; Sebastian Borowski; Ewelina Pawlikowska; Michał Binczarski; Izabela Witonska
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.918

3.  Effect of lignin-blocking agent on enzyme hydrolysis of acid pretreated hemp waste.

Authors:  Daehwan Kim; Chang Geun Yoo; Jurgen Schwarz; Sadanand Dhekney; Robert Kozak; Craig Laufer; Drew Ferrier; Skylar Mackay; Madyson Ashcraft; Richard Williams; Sinyeon Kim
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.036

4.  Lignocellulosic hydrogen production using dark fermentation by Clostridium lentocellum strain Cel10 newly isolated from Ailuropoda melanoleuca excrement.

Authors:  Luyan Zhang; Yan Li; Xianshu Liu; Nanqi Ren; Jie Ding
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Efficient conversion of biomass into lipids by using the simultaneous saccharification and enhanced lipid production process.

Authors:  Zhiwei Gong; Hongwei Shen; Qian Wang; Xiaobing Yang; Haibo Xie; Zongbao K Zhao
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 6.040

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.