Literature DB >> 18383076

Comparison of SHF and SSF processes from steam-exploded wheat straw for ethanol production by xylose-fermenting and robust glucose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Elia Tomás-Pejó1, Jose M Oliva, Mercedes Ballesteros, Lisbeth Olsson.   

Abstract

In this study, bioethanol production from steam-exploded wheat straw using different process configurations was evaluated using two Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, F12 and Red Star. The strain F12 has been engineerically modified to allow xylose consumption as cereal straw contain considerable amounts of pentoses. Red Star is a robust hexose-fermenting strain used for industrial fuel ethanol fermentations and it was used for comparative purposes. The highest ethanol concentration, 23.7 g/L, was reached using the whole slurry (10%, w/v) and the recombinant strain (F12) in an SSF process, it showed an ethanol yield on consumed sugars of 0.43 g/g and a volumetric ethanol productivity of 0.7 g/L h for the first 3 h. Ethanol concentrations obtained in SSF processes were in all cases higher than those from SHF at the same conditions. Furthermore, using the whole slurry, final ethanol concentration was improved in all tests due to the increase of potential fermentable sugars in the fermentation broth. Inhibitory compounds present in the pretreated wheat straw caused a significantly negative effect on the fermentation rate. However, it was found that the inhibitors furfural and HMF were completely metabolized by the yeast during SSF by metabolic redox reactions. An often encountered problem during xylose fermentation is considerable xylitol production that occurs due to metabolic redox imbalance. However, in our work this redox imbalance was counteracted by the detoxification reactions and no xylitol was produced. 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18383076     DOI: 10.1002/bit.21849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  30 in total

1.  Bioprocessing of agricultural residues to ethanol utilizing a cellulolytic extremophile.

Authors:  Vasudeo P Zambare; Aditya Bhalla; Kasiviswanath Muthukumarappan; Rajesh K Sani; Lew P Christopher
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Adaptation of the xylose fermenting yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae F12 for improving ethanol production in different fed-batch SSF processes.

Authors:  E Tomás-Pejó; M Ballesteros; J M Oliva; L Olsson
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Improvement of bioethanol production from pomegranate peels via acidic pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis.

Authors:  Ekin Demiray; Sevgi Ertuğrul Karatay; Gönül Dönmez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Valorisation of xylose to renewable fuels and chemicals, an essential step in augmenting the commercial viability of lignocellulosic biorefineries.

Authors:  Vivek Narisetty; Rylan Cox; Rajesh Bommareddy; Deepti Agrawal; Ejaz Ahmad; Kamal Kumar Pant; Anuj Kumar Chandel; Shashi Kant Bhatia; Dinesh Kumar; Parmeswaran Binod; Vijai Kumar Gupta; Vinod Kumar
Journal:  Sustain Energy Fuels       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 6.367

5.  Enzymatic Conversion of Sugar Beet Pulp: A Comparison of Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation and Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation for Lactic Acid Production.

Authors:  Joanna Berlowska; Weronika Cieciura-Włoch; Halina Kalinowska; Dorota Kregiel; Sebastian Borowski; Ewelina Pawlikowska; Michał Binczarski; Izabela Witonska
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.918

6.  Ethanol production from mixtures of wheat straw and wheat meal.

Authors:  Borbála Erdei; Zsolt Barta; Bálint Sipos; Kati Réczey; Mats Galbe; Guido Zacchi
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Effect of steam explosion on waste copier paper alone and in a mixed lignocellulosic substrate on saccharification and fermentation.

Authors:  Adam Elliston; David R Wilson; Nikolaus Wellner; Samuel R A Collins; Ian N Roberts; Keith W Waldron
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 9.642

8.  Development of a phenotypic assay for characterisation of ethanologenic yeast strain sensitivity to inhibitors released from lignocellulosic feedstocks.

Authors:  D Greetham; T Wimalasena; D W M Kerruish; S Brindley; R N Ibbett; R L Linforth; G Tucker; T G Phister; K A Smart
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation for bioethanol production using corncobs at lab, PDU and demo scales.

Authors:  Rakesh Koppram; Fredrik Nielsen; Eva Albers; Annika Lambert; Sune Wännström; Lars Welin; Guido Zacchi; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  On-site cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei 3EMS35 mutant and same vessel saccharification and fermentation of acid treated wheat straw for ethanol production.

Authors:  Zia-Ullah Khokhar; Qurat-Ul-Ain Syed; Jing Wu; Muhammad Amin Athar
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.068

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.