| Literature DB >> 30227708 |
Anna Moroz1,2, Chia-Yin Lee3, Yung-Hua Wang2, Jeffrey C Hsiao2, Natalia Sevillano4, Charles Truillet5, Charles S Craik4, Lawrence Fong, Cheng-I Wang3, Michael J Evans2,4.
Abstract
The swell of experimental imaging technologies to noninvasively measure immune checkpoint protein expression presents the opportunity for rigorous comparative studies toward identifying a gold standard. 89Zr-atezolizumab is currently in man, and early data show tumor targeting but also abundant uptake in several normal tissues. Therefore, we conducted a reverse translational study both to understand if tumor to normal tissue ratios for 89Zr-atezolizumab could be improved and to make direct comparisons to 89Zr-C4, a radiotracer that we showed can detect a large dynamic range of tumor-associated PD-L1 expression. PET/CT and biodistribution studies in tumor bearing immunocompetent and nu/nu mice revealed that high specific activity 89Zr-atezolizumab (∼2 μCi/μg) binds to PD-L1 on tumors but also results in very high uptake in many normal mouse tissues, as expected. Unexpectedly, 89Zr-atezolizumab uptake was generally higher in normal mouse tissues compared to 89Zr-C4 and lower in H1975, a tumor model with modest PD-L1 expression. Also unexpectedly, reducing the specific activity at least 15-fold suppressed 89Zr-atezo uptake in normal mouse tissues but increased tumor uptake to levels observed with high specific activity 89Zr-C4. In summary, these data reveal that low specific activity 89Zr-atezo may be necessary for accurately measuring PD-L1 in the tumor microenvironment, assuming a threshold can be identified that preferentially suppresses binding in normal tissues without reducing binding to tumors with abundant expression. Alternatively, high specific activity approaches like 89Zr-C4 PET may be simpler to implement clinically to measure the broad dynamic range of PD-L1 expression known to manifest among tumors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30227708 PMCID: PMC6430562 DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioconjug Chem ISSN: 1043-1802 Impact factor: 4.774