Literature DB >> 22228146

Prostate cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up.

Gerald L Andriole1, E David Crawford, Robert L Grubb, Saundra S Buys, David Chia, Timothy R Church, Mona N Fouad, Claudine Isaacs, Paul A Kvale, Douglas J Reding, Joel L Weissfeld, Lance A Yokochi, Barbara O'Brien, Lawrence R Ragard, Jonathan D Clapp, Joshua M Rathmell, Thomas L Riley, Ann W Hsing, Grant Izmirlian, Paul F Pinsky, Barnett S Kramer, Anthony B Miller, John K Gohagan, Philip C Prorok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prostate component of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial was undertaken to determine whether there is a reduction in prostate cancer mortality from screening using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal examination (DRE). Mortality after 7-10 years of follow-up has been reported previously. We report extended follow-up to 13 years after the trial.
METHODS: A total of 76 685 men, aged 55-74 years, were enrolled at 10 screening centers between November 1993 and July 2001 and randomly assigned to the intervention (organized screening of annual PSA testing for 6 years and annual DRE for 4 years; 38 340 men) and control (usual care, which sometimes included opportunistic screening; 38 345 men) arms. Screening was completed in October 2006. All incident prostate cancers and deaths from prostate cancer through 13 years of follow-up or through December 31, 2009, were ascertained. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated as the ratio of observed rates in the intervention and control arms, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution for the number of events. Poisson regression modeling was used to examine the interactions with respect to prostate cancer mortality between trial arm and age, comorbidity status, and pretrial PSA testing. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Approximately 92% of the study participants were followed to 10 years and 57% to 13 years. At 13 years, 4250 participants had been diagnosed with prostate cancer in the intervention arm compared with 3815 in the control arm. Cumulative incidence rates for prostate cancer in the intervention and control arms were 108.4 and 97.1 per 10 000 person-years, respectively, resulting in a relative increase of 12% in the intervention arm (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.17). After 13 years of follow-up, the cumulative mortality rates from prostate cancer in the intervention and control arms were 3.7 and 3.4 deaths per 10 000 person-years, respectively, resulting in a non-statistically significant difference between the two arms (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.36). No statistically significant interactions with respect to prostate cancer mortality were observed between trial arm and age (P(interaction) = .81), pretrial PSA testing (P(interaction) = .52), and comorbidity (P(interaction) = .68).
CONCLUSIONS: After 13 years of follow-up, there was no evidence of a mortality benefit for organized annual screening in the PLCO trial compared with opportunistic screening, which forms part of usual care, and there was no apparent interaction with age, baseline comorbidity, or pretrial PSA testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228146      PMCID: PMC3260132          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  20 in total

1.  Death review process in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  A B Miller; S Yurgalevitch; J L Weissfeld
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

2.  A population model of prostate cancer incidence.

Authors:  A Tsodikov; A Szabo; J Wegelin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Comorbidity and mortality results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial.

Authors:  E David Crawford; Robert Grubb; Amanda Black; Gerald L Andriole; Ming-Hui Chen; Grant Izmirlian; Christine D Berg; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Studies of prostate-cancer mortality: caution advised.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Eric Feuer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Do the data support the comorbidity hypothesis for the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial results?

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  Evidence of a healthy volunteer effect in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Authors:  P F Pinsky; A Miller; B S Kramer; T Church; D Reding; P Prorok; E Gelmann; R E Schoen; S Buys; R B Hayes; C D Berg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Mirja Ruutu; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Stark; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening.

Authors:  William C Black; David A Haggstrom; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Screening for prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Mia Djulbegovic; Rebecca J Beyth; Molly M Neuberger; Taryn L Stoffs; Johannes Vieweg; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-09-14
View more
  352 in total

Review 1.  Serum markers in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  Adverse effects of testosterone replacement therapy: an update on the evidence and controversy.

Authors:  Anthony Grech; John Breck; Joel Heidelbaugh
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-10

3.  Prostate cancer: PSA screening--more data, more debate.

Authors:  Sarah Payton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  The efficacy of prostate-specific antigen screening: Impact of key components in the ERSPC and PLCO trials.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Roman Gulati; Sue M Moss; Jonas Hugosson; Paul F Pinsky; Christine D Berg; Anssi Auvinen; Gerald L Andriole; Monique J Roobol; E David Crawford; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marco Zappa; Marcos Luján; Arnauld Villers; Tiago M de Carvalho; Eric J Feuer; Alex Tsodikov; Angela B Mariotto; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Associations between RNA splicing regulatory variants of stemness-related genes and racial disparities in susceptibility to prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yanru Wang; Jennifer A Freedman; Hongliang Liu; Patricia G Moorman; Terry Hyslop; Daniel J George; Norman H Lee; Steven R Patierno; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  A Case-Based Clinical Approach to the Investigation, Management and Screening of Families with BRCA2 Related Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Bradley King; Jana McHugh; Katie Snape
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2021-05-20

7.  Participants' Views of Retention Materials Used in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Shannon M Pretzel; Tara S Andrews; Karen Broski; Jeffery C Childs; Lisa H Gren; Sheryl L Ogden; Jerome Mabie; Brett Thomas; Heather M Rozjabek; Pamela M Marcus
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-09-20

8.  Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of stemness genes predicted to regulate RNA splicing, microRNA and oncogenic signaling are associated with prostate cancer survival.

Authors:  Jennifer A Freedman; Yanru Wang; Xuechan Li; Hongliang Liu; Patricia G Moorman; Daniel J George; Norman H Lee; Terry Hyslop; Qingyi Wei; Steven R Patierno
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Efficacy versus effectiveness study design within the European screening trial for prostate cancer: consequences for cancer incidence, overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality.

Authors:  Xiaoye Zhu; Pim J van Leeuwen; Erik Holmberg; Meelan Bul; Sigrid Carlsson; Fritz H Schröder; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  Age-related urologic problems in the complex urologic patient.

Authors:  Nicholas Faure Walker; Bradley Gill; Jonathan Olsburgh; David Gillatt; Tet Yap; Lina Michala; Claire Taylor; Hadley Wood; Dan Wood
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.