Ze-Long Yang1, Ming-Hua Zhu1, Quan Shi2, Fu-Min Lu3, Chun-Xi Wang4. 1. Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China. 2. Institute of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, China. 3. Institute of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China. 4. Department of General Surgery, Hainan Branch of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Sanya, China. bjwangcx@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of the number of lymph nodes examined (eLNs) in patients with node-negative gastric cancer (GC) and further to adjust the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system based on the number of eLNs. METHODS: Node-negative GC patients diagnosed during 1988-2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included. On the basis of a primary cohort of 4159 node-negative GC patients, we built the adjusted AJCC 8th staging system, which was then internally validated by a bootstrap method, and externally validated with an independent cohort of 5565 node-negative GC patients. RESULTS: The median number of eLNs was 10. For the training set, the optimal eLNs thresholds were determined to be 9 for node-negative GC patients. The adjusted AJCC 8th staging system for node-negative GC patients based on the number of eLNs had a significantly higher Harrell's concordance index than the initial AJCC 8th staging system (C-index, 0.635 versus 0.616; P < 0.001). Thus, the adjusted AJCC 8th staging system had superior prognostic stratification. Similar results were found in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: For node-negative GC patients in the United States, the adjusted AJCC 8th staging system based on the number of eLNs predicted survival more accurately and discriminatively.
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of the number of lymph nodes examined (eLNs) in patients with node-negative gastric cancer (GC) and further to adjust the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system based on the number of eLNs. METHODS: Node-negative GC patients diagnosed during 1988-2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included. On the basis of a primary cohort of 4159 node-negative GC patients, we built the adjusted AJCC 8th staging system, which was then internally validated by a bootstrap method, and externally validated with an independent cohort of 5565 node-negative GC patients. RESULTS: The median number of eLNs was 10. For the training set, the optimal eLNs thresholds were determined to be 9 for node-negative GC patients. The adjusted AJCC 8th staging system for node-negative GC patients based on the number of eLNs had a significantly higher Harrell's concordance index than the initial AJCC 8th staging system (C-index, 0.635 versus 0.616; P < 0.001). Thus, the adjusted AJCC 8th staging system had superior prognostic stratification. Similar results were found in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: For node-negative GC patients in the United States, the adjusted AJCC 8th staging system based on the number of eLNs predicted survival more accurately and discriminatively.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gastric adenocarcinoma; Overall survival; Staging system
Authors: J S Macdonald; S R Smalley; J Benedetti; S A Hundahl; N C Estes; G N Stemmermann; D G Haller; J A Ajani; L L Gunderson; J M Jessup; J A Martenson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-09-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alberto Marchet; Simone Mocellin; Alessandro Ambrosi; Paolo Morgagni; Domenico Garcea; Daniele Marrelli; Franco Roviello; Giovanni de Manzoni; Annamaria Minicozzi; Giovanni Natalini; Francesco De Santis; Luca Baiocchi; Arianna Coniglio; Donato Nitti Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: David Cunningham; William H Allum; Sally P Stenning; Jeremy N Thompson; Cornelis J H Van de Velde; Marianne Nicolson; J Howard Scarffe; Fiona J Lofts; Stephen J Falk; Timothy J Iveson; David B Smith; Ruth E Langley; Monica Verma; Simon Weeden; Yu Jo Chua Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-07-06 Impact factor: 91.245