Literature DB >> 30225467

Tackling problem nonlinearities & delays via asymmetric, state-dependent objective costs in MPC of an artificial pancreas.

Ravi Gondhalekar1, Eyal Dassau1, Francis J Doyle1.   

Abstract

The design of a Model Predictive Control (MPC) law for an Artificial Pancreas (AP) that automatically delivers insulin to people with type 1 diabetes mellitus is considered. An MPC law was recently proposed that exploits the simplicity of linear dynamical models, but is in two ways a 'nonlinear' departure of standard linear MPC, while circumnavigating the complexity of cumbersome, fully nonlinear MPC approaches. The first of two issues focused on is the nonlinearity of the control problem, and it is demonstrated how this can be tackled via asymmetric objective functions. The second issue is controller induced hypoglycemia resulting from the large delay in actuation and sensing. The proposed MPC strategy employs an asymmetric, state-dependent objective function that leads to a nonlinear optimization problem. The result is an AP controller with significantly elevated safety and comparable control performance. The contribution of this paper is a detailed in-silico analysis of the proposed control law, and a clinical demonstration of the benefits of asymmetric objective functions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Model predictive control; artificial pancreas; asymmetric objective cost; nonlinear optimization; safety critical control; state-dependent objective cost; type 1 diabetes

Year:  2015        PMID: 30225467      PMCID: PMC6138875          DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.11.276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc IFAC World Congress


  16 in total

1.  A model-based algorithm for blood glucose control in type I diabetic patients.

Authors:  R S Parker; F J Doyle; N A Peppas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Evaluating the efficacy of closed-loop glucose regulation via control-variability grid analysis.

Authors:  Lalo Magni; Davide M Raimondo; Chiara Dalla Man; Marc Breton; Stephen Patek; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Claudio Cobelli; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07

3.  Periodic-zone model predictive control for diurnal closed-loop operation of an artificial pancreas.

Authors:  Ravi Gondhalekar; Eyal Dassau; Howard C Zisser; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-01

4.  Multivariable adaptive closed-loop control of an artificial pancreas without meal and activity announcement.

Authors:  Kamuran Turksoy; Elif Seyma Bayrak; Lauretta Quinn; Elizabeth Littlejohn; Ali Cinar
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Velocity-weighting to prevent controller-induced hypoglycemia in MPC of an artificial pancreas to treat T1DM.

Authors:  Ravi Gondhalekar; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Proc Am Control Conf       Date:  2015-07-30

6.  MPC Design for Rapid Pump-Attenuation and Expedited Hyperglycemia Response to Treat T1DM with an Artificial Pancreas.

Authors:  Ravi Gondhalekar; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Proc Am Control Conf       Date:  2014-07-21

7.  Zone model predictive control: a strategy to minimize hyper- and hypoglycemic events.

Authors:  Benyamin Grosman; Eyal Dassau; Howard C Zisser; Lois Jovanovic; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

8.  The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator: New Features.

Authors:  Chiara Dalla Man; Francesco Micheletto; Dayu Lv; Marc Breton; Boris Kovatchev; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01

9.  Analysis of three T1DM simulation models for evaluating robust closed-loop controllers.

Authors:  P Colmegna; R S Sánchez Peña
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  Artificial pancreas: past, present, future.

Authors:  Claudio Cobelli; Eric Renard; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 9.461

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.