| Literature DB >> 30223828 |
Vicente Mora1, Ildefonso Roldán2, Elena Romero2, Diana Romero3, Javier Bertolín2, Natalia Ugalde3, Carmen Pérez-Olivares2, Melisa Rodriguez-Israel3, Jana Pérez-Gozalbo2, Jorge A Lowenstein3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) results from the combined action of longitudinal and circumferential contraction, radial thickening, and basal and apical rotation. The study of these parameters together may lead to an accurate assessment of the cardiac function.Entities:
Keywords: Deformation imaging; Myocardial strain; Speckle tracking; Ventricular function; Ventricular torsion
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30223828 PMCID: PMC6142420 DOI: 10.1186/s12947-018-0135-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Fig. 1Graphic representation of the LV. Parameters that contribute to LV myocardial function. Abbreviations in text
Characteristics of the study population, differentiated by sex and age
| Total (n 90) | Men (n 52) | Women (n 38) |
| ≤ 55 years (n 59) | > 55 years (n 31) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS (m2) | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 0.01 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 0.42 |
| HR (b/m) | 65 ± 10 | 65 ± 11 | 66 ± 9 | 0.65 | 65 ± 11 | 67 ± 10 | 0.32 |
| sBP (mmHg) | 119 ± 16 | 121 ± 16 | 115 ± 15 | 0.07 | 117 ± 17 | 123 ± 15 | 0.11 |
| LVd (mm) | 45.5 ± 4.5 | 47.4 ± 4.2 | 43.0 ± 3.4 | 0.01 | 46.1 ± 4.5 | 44.3 ± 4.1 | 0.06 |
| LVEDV (ml) | 89.2 ± 28.4 | 101.1 ± 27.9 | 73.0 ± 20.1 | 0.01 | 96.1 ± 29.3 | 76.2 ± 21.7 | 0.01 |
| LVESV (ml) | 29.8 ± 11.1 | 34.1 ± 11.5 | 24.1 ± 7.5 | 0.01 | 32.9 ± 11.4 | 24.1 ± 8.1 | 0.01 |
| LVEF (%) | 66.6 ± 5.5 | 66.4 ± 5.4 | 66.9 ± 5.7 | 0.68 | 65.7 ± 5.3 | 68.4 ± 5.7 | 0.03 |
BS Body surface area, HR Heart rate, sBP systolic blood pressure, LVd Left ventricle end-diastolic diameter, LVEDV Left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LVESV Left ventricular end-systolic volume, LVEF Left ventricular ejection fraction
Values of global longitudinal, radial and circumferential strain, and rotational parameters of the study population, differentiated by sex and age
| Total (n 90) | Men (n 52) | Women (n 38) |
| ≤ 55 y (n 59) | > 55 y (n 31) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LS (%) | −21.1 ± 2.1 | − 20.7 ± 2.0 | −21.7 ± 2.1 | 0.02 | −21.1 ± 1.8 | −21.1 ± 2.5 | 0.98 |
| RS (%) | 33.5 ± 10.2 | 34.0 ± 9.9 | 32.8 ± 10.7 | 0.59 | 32.4 ± 9.6 | 35.6 ± 11.2 | 0.15 |
| CS (%) | −21.6 ± 3.9 | −21.9 ± 4.3 | −21.3 ± 3.4 | 0.41 | −21.2 ± 3.4 | − 22.4 ± 4.7 | 0.16 |
| MAPSE (cm) | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.48 ± 0,1 | 1.36 ± 0.1 | 0.01 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 0.01 |
| B-A (cm) | 8.2 ± 0.8 | 8.6 ± 0.6 | 7.6 ± 0.6 | 0.01 | 8.3 ± 0.8 | 7.9 ± 0.8 | 0.04 |
| Apical Rot (°) | 14.4 ± 6.5 | 14.9 ± 7.0 | 13.7 ± 5.9 | 0.40 | 14.2 ± 1.0 | 14.7 ± 0.9 | 0.76 |
| Basal Rot (°) | − 6.2 ± 3.6 | −6.0 ± 3.5 | −6.5 ± 3.8 | 0.50 | −5.7 ± 3.4 | − 7.3 ± 3.9 | 0.05 |
| Twist (°) | 20.3 ± 7.6 | 20.7 ± 7.9 | 19.6 ± 7.1 | 0.51 | 19.4 ± 7.9 | 21.9 ± 6.6 | 0.14 |
| CTor (°/cm) | 2.5 ± 1.0 | 2.4 ± 1.0 | 2.6 ± 1.0 | 0.39 | 2.3 ± 1.0 | 2.8 ± 0.9 | 0.05 |
| TorI (°/cm) | 14.2 ± 5.3 | 14.0 ± 5.4 | 14.5 ± 5.2 | 0.67 | 13.1 ± 5.0 | 16.5 ± 15.2 | 0.01 |
| CDP | |||||||
| DP (° x %) | −432 ± 172 | − 431 ± 170 | 433 ± 177 | 0.96 | − 415 ± 182 | − 463 ± 149 | 0.21 |
| DefI (° / %) | − 0.96 ± 0.36 | −1.00 ± 0.39 | −0.90 ± 0.31 | 0.18 | −0.9 ± 0.3 | −1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.09 |
LS Longitudinal Strain, RS Radial Strain, CS Circumferential Strain, MAPSE Mitral annular plane systolic excursion, B-A Base-Apex distance, Rot. Rotation, CTor Classic Torsion, TorI Torsion Index, CDP Combinated Deformation Parameter, DP Deformation Product, DefI Deformation Index
Combinated Deformation Parameter. Possibilities of presentation
| Combinated deformation parameter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Deformation Product (DP) (Twist x LS) (° x %) | Deformation Index (DefI) (Twist/LS) (° / %) | Status of Twist and LS | Myocardial function |
| Normal | Normal | Normal Twist + Normal LS | Normal |
| Pseudonormal | Increased | Increased Twist + LS diminished | Impaired |
| Diminished | Diminished | Diminished Twist + Normal LS | Impaired |
| Increased | Normal Twist + LS diminished | Impaired | |
| Normal | Diminished Twist + LS diminished | Impaired | |
LS Longitudinal strain
Intraobserver and interobserver variability
| Intraclass correlation coefficient (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Intraobserver | ||
| Global longitudinal strain | 0.86 (0.53–0,96) | < 0.001 |
| Twist | 0.94 (0.65–0.98) | < 0.001 |
| Classic Torsion | 0.96 (0.84–0.99) | < 0.001 |
| Torsion index | 0.93 (0.63–0.98) | < 0.001 |
| Strain product | 0.97 (0.82–0.99) | < 0.001 |
| Strain index | 0.85 (0.52–0.96) | < 0.001 |
| Interobserver | ||
| Global longitudinal strain | 0.87 (0.58–0.96) | < 0.001 |
| Twist | 0.85 (0.53–0.96) | < 0.001 |
| Classic Torsion | 0.87 (0.59–0.96) | < 0.001 |
| Torsion index | 0.80 (0.41–0.94) | < 0.001 |
| Strain product | 0.90 (0.65–0.97) | < 0.001 |
| Strain index | 0.77 (0.31–0.94) | 0.003 |
Evolution in a case of amyloidosis. Normal values of reference in Table 2
| Twist (°) | LS (%) | B-A (cm) | MAPSE (cm) | CTor (°/cm) | TorI (°/cm) | Combined deformation parameter | LVEF (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DP (° x %) | DefI (° / %) | ||||||||
| Basal | 20 | −14 | 8 | 0.9 | 2.5 (N) | 22.2 (↑) | − 280 (↓) | − 1.4 (↑) | 55% |
| 1 year | 15 | −10 | 8 | 0.7 | 1.8 (↓) | 21.4 (↑) | − 150 (↓) | − 1.5 (↑) | 55% |
| 2 years | 8 | −8 | 8 | 0.6 | 1.0 (↓) | 13.3 (N) | −64 (↓) | −1 (N) | 48% |
| 3 years | 5 | −7 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.6 (↓) | 10.0 (↓) | −35 (↓) | −0.7 ↓ | 35% |
From the beginning and throughout follow-up a low DP is an indicator of myocardial dysfunction, with normal LVEF. In the baseline diagnosis, a greater TorI and DefI are observed (with respect to the normal values in Table 2), reflecting an increase in myocardial torsion, which compensates to maintain the LVEF. This is not detected by the CTor measure, which appears normal. As the disease progresses, the normalization and subsequent diminishing of TorI and DefI are accompanied by lower LVEF, which reflects the exhaustion of the compensating mechanism. CTor shows less sensitivity in the detection of systolic dysfunction during follow-up
LS Longitudinal Strain, B-A Base-Apex distance, MAPSE Mitral annular plane systolic excursion, T Twist, CTor Classic Torsion, TorI Torsion Index, DP Deformation Product, DefI Deformation Index, LVEF Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, N normal
↑: Increased, ↓: Diminished