| Literature DB >> 26712329 |
Matteo Cameli1, Sergio Mondillo2, Marco Solari2, Francesca Maria Righini2, Valentina Andrei2, Carla Contaldi3, Eugenia De Marco4, Michele Di Mauro5, Roberta Esposito6, Sabina Gallina6, Roberta Montisci7, Andrea Rossi8, Maurizio Galderisi6, Stefano Nistri9, Eustachio Agricola10, Donato Mele11.
Abstract
Assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function is the cornerstone of the echocardiographic examination. There are many echocardiographic parameters that can be used for clinical and research purposes, each one with its pros and cons. The LV ejection fraction is the most used one due to its feasibility and predictability, but it also has many limits, related to both the imaging technique used for calculation and to the definition itself. LV longitudinal function is expression of subendocardial fibers contraction. Because the subendocardium is often involved early in many pathological processes, its analysis has been a fertile field for the development of sensitive parameters. Longitudinal function can be evaluated in many ways, such as M-mode echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging, and speckle tracking echocardiography. This latter is a relatively new tool to assess LV function through measurement of myocardial strain, with a high temporal and spatial resolution and a better inter- and intra-observer reproducibility compared to Doppler strain. It is angle independent, not affected by translation cardiac movements, and can assess simultaneously the entire myocardium along all the three-dimensional geometrical (longitudinal, circumferential, and radial) axes. Speckle tracking echocardiography also allows the analysis of LV torsion. The aim of this paper was to review the main echocardiographic parameters of LV systolic function and to describe its pros and cons.Keywords: Ejection fraction; Speckle tracking; Strain; Stroke volume; Torsion
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26712329 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-015-9521-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Fail Rev ISSN: 1382-4147 Impact factor: 4.214