Literature DB >> 30223675

Patient Satisfaction Is Associated With Dialysis Facility Quality and Star Ratings.

Abhijit V Kshirsagar1, Amir Alishahi Tabriz1, Heejung Bang2, Shoou-Yih D Lee3.   

Abstract

The Dialysis Facility Compare Star Rating and the Quality Incentive Program (QIP) generate separate performance scores from clinical measures, and the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS) survey evaluates patient satisfaction across 6 separate domains related to nephrologists, dialysis facility, and information transmission. This study examined the relationship of the 3 measures for US clinics, modeling the 6 ICH-CAHPS domains as independent variables and QIP and star ratings as dependent variables. Among 3176 dialysis clinics, domains assessing dialysis facility and information transmission had a consistently stronger relationship with QIP and star ratings than the domains assessing nephrologists: QIP, β (95% CI) = 1.62 (1.26-1.97) for dialysis facility staff rating, 0.70 (0.35-1.05) for nephrologists; star rating, odds ratio (95% CI) = 1.38 (1.29-1.49) for dialysis facility staff rating, 1.17 (1.09-1.25) for nephrologists. Patient satisfaction is associated with dialysis care quality, with surprising differences between nephrologists and dialysis facilities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAHPS; dialysis; quality; star ratings

Year:  2018        PMID: 30223675      PMCID: PMC6422762          DOI: 10.1177/1062860618796310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  26 in total

1.  Toward a national consumer survey: evaluation of the CABHS and MHSIP instruments.

Authors:  S V Eisen; J A Shaul; H S Leff; V Stringfellow; B R Clarridge; P D Cleary
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  The development of a CAHPS instrument for Nursing Home Residents (NHCAHPS).

Authors:  Judith Sangl; Joan Buchanan; Carol Cosenza; Shula Bernard; Susan Keller; Nancy Mitchell; Julie Brown; Nicholas Castle; Edward Sekscenski; Deborah Larwood
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  2007

3.  Development, implementation, and public reporting of the HCAHPS survey.

Authors:  Laura A Giordano; Marc N Elliott; Elizabeth Goldstein; William G Lehrman; Patrice A Spencer
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ron D Hays; William G Lehrman; Lise Rybowski; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Provider Visits and Early Vascular Access Placement in Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Matthew Mell; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Glenn M Chertow; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Incentives for caution: the in-center hemodialysis consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems survey and experience of care.

Authors:  Ezra Gabbay; Klemens B Meyer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 7.  Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.

Authors:  L Aubree Shay; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Medicare program; end-stage renal disease prospective payment system. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2010-08-12

9.  Medicare Program; End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System, and Quality Incentive Program. Final Rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2015-11-06

10.  Area-level poverty, race/ethnicity & dialysis star ratings.

Authors:  Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Raj N Manickam; Yi Mu; Jennifer E Flythe; Andrew I Chin; Heejung Bang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Patient-Reported Experiences with Dialysis Care and Provider Visit Frequency.

Authors:  Brian M Brady; Bo Zhao; Bich N Dang; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Glenn M Chertow; Kevin F Erickson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 10.614

2.  Applying a Geriatrics Framework to Older Dialysis Patients' Needs: Getting There Is Half the Battle.

Authors:  O Alison Potok; Dena E Rifkin
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2020-09-01

3.  Assessing the Impacts of Misclassified Case-Mix Factors on Health Care Provider Profiling: Performance of Dialysis Facilities.

Authors:  Yi Mu; Andrew I Chin; Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Heejung Bang
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Shortcoming of Measuring Patient Satisfaction's Association With Anemia-Based Cardiovascular Risk in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients.

Authors:  Hoda Abdolmonem Ahmad; Dixon Thomas; Maryam Alrais; Aaron Burton; Rajaram Jagdale
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2021-12-08

Review 5.  Identifying Patient Satisfaction Determinants in Hemodialysis Settings: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Arwa Al Nuairi; Hala Bermamet; Hind Abdulla; Mecit Can Emre Simsekler; Siddiq Anwar; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-09-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.