Brian M Brady1, Bo Zhao2, Bich N Dang3, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer2, Glenn M Chertow1, Kevin F Erickson4,5. 1. Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 2. Selzman Institute for Kidney Health and Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 3. Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 4. Selzman Institute for Kidney Health and Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas kevin.erickson@bcm.edu. 5. Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: New payment models resulting from the Advancing American Kidney Health initiative may create incentives for nephrologists to focus less on face-to-face in-center hemodialysis visits. This study aimed to understand whether more frequent nephrology practitioner dialysis visits improved patient experience and could help inform future policy. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a cross-sectional study of patients receiving dialysis from April 1, 2015 through January 31, 2016, we linked patient records from a national kidney failure registry to patient experience data from the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. We used a multivariable mixed effects linear regression model to examine the association between nephrology practitioner visit frequency and patient-reported experiences with nephrologist care. RESULTS: Among 5125 US dialysis facilities, 2981 (58%) had ≥30 In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys completed between April 2015 and January 2016, and 243,324 patients receiving care within these facilities had Medicare Parts A/B coverage. Face-to-face practitioner visits per month were 71% with four or more visits, 17% with two to three visits, 4% with one visit, and 8% with no visits. Each 10% absolute greater proportion of patients seen by their nephrology practitioner(s) four or more times per month was associated with a modestly but statistically significant lower score of patient experience with nephrologist care by -0.3 points (95% confidence interval, -0.5 to -0.1) and no effect on experience with other domains of dialysis care. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of patient experiences at the dialysis facility level, frequent nephrology practitioner visits to facilities where patients undergo outpatient hemodialysis were not associated with better patient experiences.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: New payment models resulting from the Advancing American Kidney Health initiative may create incentives for nephrologists to focus less on face-to-face in-center hemodialysis visits. This study aimed to understand whether more frequent nephrology practitioner dialysis visits improved patient experience and could help inform future policy. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a cross-sectional study of patients receiving dialysis from April 1, 2015 through January 31, 2016, we linked patient records from a national kidney failure registry to patient experience data from the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. We used a multivariable mixed effects linear regression model to examine the association between nephrology practitioner visit frequency and patient-reported experiences with nephrologist care. RESULTS: Among 5125 US dialysis facilities, 2981 (58%) had ≥30 In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys completed between April 2015 and January 2016, and 243,324 patients receiving care within these facilities had Medicare Parts A/B coverage. Face-to-face practitioner visits per month were 71% with four or more visits, 17% with two to three visits, 4% with one visit, and 8% with no visits. Each 10% absolute greater proportion of patients seen by their nephrology practitioner(s) four or more times per month was associated with a modestly but statistically significant lower score of patient experience with nephrologist care by -0.3 points (95% confidence interval, -0.5 to -0.1) and no effect on experience with other domains of dialysis care. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of patient experiences at the dialysis facility level, frequent nephrology practitioner visits to facilities where patients undergo outpatient hemodialysis were not associated with better patient experiences.
Authors: Kevin F Erickson; Kelvin B Tan; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Glenn M Chertow; Jay Bhattacharya Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Evelyn K Mentari; Peter B DeOreo; Andrew S O'Connor; Thomas E Love; Edmond S Ricanati; Ashwini R Sehgal Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-02-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Beverly A Weidmer; Paul D Cleary; San Keller; Christian Evensen; Margarita P Hurtado; Beth Kosiak; Patricia M Gallagher; Roger Levine; Ron D Hays Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Eugene Lin; Glenn M Chertow; Brandon Yan; Elizabeth Malcolm; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Taimur Dad; Hocine Tighiouart; Joshua J Fenton; Eduardo Lacson; Klemens B Meyer; Dana C Miskulin; Daniel E Weiner; Michelle M Richardson Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 2.655