Literature DB >> 11497028

Toward a national consumer survey: evaluation of the CABHS and MHSIP instruments.

S V Eisen1, J A Shaul, H S Leff, V Stringfellow, B R Clarridge, P D Cleary.   

Abstract

This article describes a study evaluating the Consumer Assessment of Behavioral Health Survey (CABHS) and the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) surveys. The purpose of the study was to provide data that could be used to develop recommendations for an improved instrument. Subjects were 3,443 adults in six behavioral health plans. The surveys did not differ significantly in response rate or consumer burden. Both surveys reliably assessed access to treatment and aspects of appropriateness and quality. The CABHS survey reliably assessed features of the insurance plan; the MHSIP survey reliably assessed treatment outcome. Analyses of comparable items suggested which survey items had greater validity. Results are discussed in terms of consistency with earlier research using these and other consumer surveys. Implications and recommendations for survey development, quality improvement, and national policy initiatives to evaluate health plan performance are presented.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11497028     DOI: 10.1007/bf02287249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1094-3412            Impact factor:   1.505


  31 in total

1.  The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement.

Authors:  P D Cleary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Development of a consumer survey for behavioral health services.

Authors:  S V Eisen; J A Shaul; B Clarridge; D Nelson; J Spink; P D Cleary
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Translating the CAHPS 1.0 Survey Instruments into Spanish. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.

Authors:  B Weidmer; J Brown; L Garcia
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.

Authors:  R D Hays; J A Shaul; V S Williams; J S Lubalin; L D Harris-Kojetin; S F Sweeny; P D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Developing performance measures for alcohol and other drug services in managed care plans. Washington Circle Group.

Authors:  F McCorry; D W Garnick; J Bartlett; F Cotter; M Chalk
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2000-11

Review 6.  The MHSIP mental health report card. A consumer-oriented approach to monitoring the quality of mental health plans. Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program.

Authors:  G B Teague; V Ganju; J A Hornik; J R Johnson; J McKinney
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with substance use disorders: alcohol, cocaine, opioids. American Psychiatric Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 8.  Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder. American Psychiatric Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Influence of patient and hospital factors on consumer satisfaction with inpatient mental health treatment.

Authors:  R Rosenheck; N J Wilson; M Meterko
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care.

Authors:  J E Ware; M K Snyder; W R Wright; A R Davies
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  1983
View more
  18 in total

1.  Continuity of care: validation of a new self-report measure for individuals using mental health services.

Authors:  Janet Durbin; Paula Goering; David L Streiner; George Pink
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Assessing the utility of consumer surveys for improving the quality of behavioral health care services.

Authors:  J Randy Koch; Alison B Breland; Mary Nash; Karen Cropsey
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  Quality assessment of mental health care by people with severe mental disorders: a participatory research project.

Authors:  Angelo Barbato; Alessia Bajoni; Filippo Rapisarda; Vito D'Anza; Luigi Fabrizio De Luca; Cristiana Inglese; Sonia Iapichino; Fabrizio Mauriello; Barbara D'Avanzo
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2013-12-08

4.  Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ron D Hays; William G Lehrman; Lise Rybowski; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.

Authors:  Claudia Bull; Joshua Byrnes; Ruvini Hettiarachchi; Martin Downes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The influence of patient characteristics on ratings of managed behavioral health care.

Authors:  Matthew J Carlson; James A Shaul; Susan V Eisen; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.505

7.  The Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Adult Consumer Satisfaction Survey Factor Structure and Relation to External Criteria.

Authors:  Alan Shafer; Rosemary Ang
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.505

8.  Measurement of Perceived and Technical Quality of Care for Depression in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Groups.

Authors:  H Stephen Leff; Clifton Chow; Dow A Wieman; Laysha Ostrow; Dharma E Cortés; Treniece Harris
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2016-08

9.  Religion and spirituality in the lives of people with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Patrick Corrigan; Brian McCorkle; Bonnie Schell; Kathryn Kidder
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2003-12

10.  Patient Satisfaction Is Associated With Dialysis Facility Quality and Star Ratings.

Authors:  Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Heejung Bang; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.