Literature DB >> 15770883

Survey nonresponse bias among young adults: the role of alcohol, tobacco, and drugs.

Carol B Cunradi1, Roland Moore, Moira Killoran, Genevieve Ames.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the role of alcohol, tobacco, and drug use as predictors of survey panel attrition among an occupational cohort of young adults in the U.S. military. Baseline data on substance use and sociodemographic factors were obtained from 2838 men and women through confidential, self-administered questionnaires while they attended Navy basic training or Officer Candidate School in 1998. Longitudinal follow-up using mailed self-administered questionnaires was begun in 2000. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to estimate the odds of attrition in relation to baseline substance use. Results revealed that tobacco use was a significant predictor of attrition [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.63; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.37, 1.95]. A significant interaction between level of education and drug use indicated that respondents with less than a college education who were also drug users were at elevated risk for attrition (OR = 2.39; 95% CI 1.09, 5.28). Other significant predictors of panel attrition were male gender and younger age. Alcohol use was not significantly associated with attrition. The findings suggest that tobacco users and drug users with less than a college education may be an important source of nonresponse bias in longitudinal surveys of employed young adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15770883     DOI: 10.1081/ja-200048447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Subst Use Misuse        ISSN: 1082-6084            Impact factor:   2.164


  25 in total

1.  Nonresponse bias in a longitudinal measurement design examining substance use across the transition out of high school.

Authors:  Jamie Griffin; Megan E Patrick
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Social environmental influences on the development and resolution of alcohol problems.

Authors:  Barbara S McCrady; Robert A Zucker; Brooke S G Molina; Lyndsay Ammon; Genevieve M Ames; Richard Longabaugh
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Electronic Health Records to Evaluate and Account for Non-response Bias: A Survey of Patients Using Chronic Opioid Therapy.

Authors:  Susan M Shortreed; Michael Von Korff; Stephen Thielke; Linda LeResche; Kathleen Saunders; Dori Rosenberg; Judith A Turner
Journal:  Obs Stud       Date:  2016-02-01

4.  Attrition bias in a U.S. Internet survey of alcohol use among college freshmen.

Authors:  Thomas P McCoy; Edward H Ip; Jill N Blocker; Heather Champion; Scott D Rhodes; Kimberly G Wagoner; Ananda Mitra; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.582

5.  A modified random walk door-to-door recruitment strategy for collecting social and biological data relating to mental health, substance use, addiction, and violence problems in a Canadian community.

Authors:  Andrea Flynn; Paul F Tremblay; Jürgen Rehm; Samantha Wells
Journal:  Int J Alcohol Drug Res       Date:  2013-06-09

Review 6.  National Surveys and Tobacco Use Among African Americans: A Review of Critical Factors.

Authors:  Italia V Rolle; Derrick D Beasley; Sara M Kennedy; Valerie J Rock; Linda Neff
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Selective nonresponse bias in population-based survey estimates of drug use behaviors in the United States.

Authors:  Sean Esteban McCabe; Brady T West
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.328

8.  The safe passage study: design, methods, recruitment, and follow-up approach.

Authors:  Kimberly A Dukes; Larry Burd; Amy J Elliott; William P Fifer; Rebecca D Folkerth; Gary D V Hankins; Dale Hereld; Howard J Hoffman; Michael M Myers; Hein J Odendaal; Caroline Signore; Lisa M Sullivan; Marian Willinger; Colleen Wright; Hannah C Kinney
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  Persistence pays off: follow-up methods for difficult-to-track longitudinal samples.

Authors:  John H Kleschinsky; Leslie B Bosworth; Sarah E Nelson; Erinn K Walsh; Howard J Shaffer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  Researching special populations: retention of Latino gay and bisexual men and transgender persons in longitudinal health research.

Authors:  L M Kuhns; R Vazquez; J Ramirez-Valles
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2007-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.