Literature DB >> 30221368

Auxiliary variable-enriched biomarker-stratified design.

Ting Wang1, Xiaofei Wang2, Haibo Zhou1, Jianwen Cai1, Stephen L George2.   

Abstract

Clinical trials in the era of precision medicine require assessment of biomarkers to identify appropriate subgroups of patients for targeted therapy. In a biomarker-stratified design (BSD), biomarkers are measured on all patients and used as stratification variables. However, such a trial can be both inefficient and costly, especially when the prevalence of the subgroup of primary interest is low and the cost of assessing the biomarkers is high. Efficiency can be improved and costs reduced by using enriched biomarker-stratified designs, in which patients of primary interest, typically the biomarker-positive patients, are oversampled. We consider a special type of enrichment design, an auxiliary variable-enriched design (AEBSD), in which enrichment is based on some inexpensive auxiliary variable that is positively correlated with the true biomarker. The proposed AEBSD reduces the total cost of the trial compared with a standard BSD when the prevalence rate of true biomarker positivity is small and the positive predictive value (PPV) of the auxiliary biomarker is larger than the prevalence rate. In addition, for an AEBSD, we can immediately randomize the patients selected in the screening process without waiting for the result of the true biomarker test, reducing the treatment waiting time. We propose an adaptive Bayesian method to adjust the assumed PPV while the trial is ongoing. Numerical studies and an example illustrate the approach. An R package is available.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian method; adaptive design; auxiliary variables; biomarker-stratified design; cost minimization; enrichment strategy; precision medicine; survival time; treatment selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30221368      PMCID: PMC6279614          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  50 in total

1.  Adaptive sample size calculations in group sequential trials.

Authors:  W Lehmacher; G Wassmer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Optimal design for epidemiological studies subject to designed missingness.

Authors:  Michele Morara; Louise Ryan; Andres Houseman; Warren Strauss
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Randomized clinical trials with biomarkers: design issues.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Lisa M McShane; Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Using Bayesian modeling in frequentist adaptive enrichment designs.

Authors:  Noah Simon; Richard Simon
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 5.  Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Manish K Thakur; Shirish M Gadgeel
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.119

6.  Two-stage adaptive cutoff design for building and validating a prognostic biomarker signature.

Authors:  Mei-Yin C Polley; Eric C Polley; Erich P Huang; Boris Freidlin; Richard Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  The Fundamental Difficulty With Evaluating the Accuracy of Biomarkers for Guiding Treatment.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe; Lisa M McShane; Daniel J Sargent; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses.

Authors:  P Bauer; K Köhne
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Measuring the performance of markers for guiding treatment decisions.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe; Patrick M Bossuyt; William E Barlow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Design and inference for cancer biomarker study with an outcome and auxiliary-dependent subsampling.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Signature Enrichment Design with Bayesian Adaptive Randomization.

Authors:  Fang Xia; Stephen L George; Jing Ning; Liang Li; Xuelin Huang
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 1.404

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.