Literature DB >> 19508239

Design and inference for cancer biomarker study with an outcome and auxiliary-dependent subsampling.

Xiaofei Wang1, Haibo Zhou.   

Abstract

In cancer research, it is important to evaluate the performance of a biomarker (e.g., molecular, genetic, or imaging) that correlates patients' prognosis or predicts patients' response to treatment in a large prospective study. Due to overall budget constraint and high cost associated with bioassays, investigators often have to select a subset from all registered patients for biomarker assessment. To detect a potentially moderate association between the biomarker and the outcome, investigators need to decide how to select the subset of a fixed size such that the study efficiency can be enhanced. We show that, instead of drawing a simple random sample from the study cohort, greater efficiency can be achieved by allowing the selection probability to depend on the outcome and an auxiliary variable; we refer to such a sampling scheme as outcome and auxiliary-dependent subsampling (OADS). This article is motivated by the need to analyze data from a lung cancer biomarker study that adopts the OADS design to assess epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations as a predictive biomarker for whether a subject responds to a greater extent to EGFR inhibitor drugs. We propose an estimated maximum-likelihood method that accommodates the OADS design and utilizes all observed information, especially those contained in the likelihood score of EGFR mutations (an auxiliary variable of EGFR mutations) that is available to all patients. We derive the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimator and evaluate its finite sample properties via simulation. We illustrate the proposed method with a data example.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19508239      PMCID: PMC2891224          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01280.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Random effects logistic regression analysis with auxiliary covariates.

Authors:  Haibo Zhou; Jianwei Chen; Jianwen Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Analytic methods for two-stage case-control studies and other stratified designs.

Authors:  W D Flanders; S Greenland
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Designs and analysis of two-stage studies.

Authors:  L P Zhao; S Lipsitz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Flexible maximum likelihood methods for assessing joint effects in case-control studies with complex sampling.

Authors:  S Wacholder; C R Weinberg
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A two stage design for the study of the relationship between a rare exposure and a rare disease.

Authors:  J E White
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  A semiparametric empirical likelihood method for biased sampling schemes with auxiliary covariates.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Biomarkers of response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Working Group: standardization for use in the clinical trial setting.

Authors:  David A Eberhard; Giuseppe Giaccone; Bruce E Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy.

Authors:  J Guillermo Paez; Pasi A Jänne; Jeffrey C Lee; Sean Tracy; Heidi Greulich; Stacey Gabriel; Paula Herman; Frederic J Kaye; Neal Lindeman; Titus J Boggon; Katsuhiko Naoki; Hidefumi Sasaki; Yoshitaka Fujii; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.

Authors:  Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A semiparametric empirical likelihood method for data from an outcome-dependent sampling scheme with a continuous outcome.

Authors:  Haibo Zhou; M A Weaver; J Qin; M P Longnecker; M C Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  15 in total

1.  Mixed effect regression analysis for a cluster-based two-stage outcome-auxiliary-dependent sampling design with a continuous outcome.

Authors:  Wangli Xu; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Outcome- and auxiliary-dependent subsampling and its statistical inference.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Yougui Wu; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Semiparametric inference for a 2-stage outcome-auxiliary-dependent sampling design with continuous outcome.

Authors:  Haibo Zhou; Yuanshan Wu; Yanyan Liu; Jianwen Cai
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 4.  Recent progresses in outcome-dependent sampling with failure time data.

Authors:  Jieli Ding; Tsui-Shan Lu; Jianwen Cai; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Outcome-Dependent Sampling Design and Inference for Cox's Proportional Hazards Model.

Authors:  Jichang Yu; Yanyan Liu; Jianwen Cai; Dale P Sandler; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  Statistical inference for the additive hazards model under outcome-dependent sampling.

Authors:  Jichang Yu; Yanyan Liu; Dale P Sandler; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Can J Stat       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.875

7.  Assessing treatment-selection markers using a potential outcomes framework.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Peter B Gilbert; Holly Janes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Regression analysis for secondary response variable in a case-cohort study.

Authors:  Yinghao Pan; Jianwen Cai; Sangmi Kim; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Secondary outcome analysis for data from an outcome-dependent sampling design.

Authors:  Yinghao Pan; Jianwen Cai; Matthew P Longnecker; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Statistical inference for a two-stage outcome-dependent sampling design with a continuous outcome.

Authors:  Haibo Zhou; Rui Song; Yuanshan Wu; Jing Qin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.