PURPOSE: American minority groups have been historically underrepresented in phase III prostate cancer clinical trials despite often having higher risk disease. We analyzed enrollment trends of major racial/ethnic groups in the United States in phase III prostate cancer trials between 2003 and 2014 compared to SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) incidence data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase III prostate cancer trials primarily enrolling patients from the United States were identified in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Enrollment trends were analyzed for major racial/ethnic groups. Prostate cancer incidence data from the SEER registry were used to identify enrollment targets. The enrollment difference was determined by calculating the absolute difference between the percent of a racial/ethnic subgroup in the SEER registry population and the percent of that subgroup in the phase III prostate cancer trial population. RESULTS: Among 39 studies identified African American enrollment in therapeutic trials increased across the study period (p <0.001). The enrollment difference for African Americans was -9.0% (95% CI -7.6- -10.5, p <0.001) in 2003 to 2005 and 1.4% (95% CI 0.2-2.6, p = 0.020) in 2012 to 2014. However, African American men were under enrolled in metastatic disease trials (enrollment difference -5.8%, 95% CI -4.8- -6.8, p <0.001). Latino and Asian American men were consistently under enrolled in all trial types. CONCLUSIONS: Minority groups in the United States were largely under enrolled in phase III prostate cancer trials between 2003 and 2014. While recruitment efforts may have had an impact, as demonstrated by increased enrollment of African American men, there remains a need to expand recruitment efforts to achieve diversity in trials.
PURPOSE: American minority groups have been historically underrepresented in phase III prostate cancer clinical trials despite often having higher risk disease. We analyzed enrollment trends of major racial/ethnic groups in the United States in phase III prostate cancer trials between 2003 and 2014 compared to SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) incidence data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase III prostate cancer trials primarily enrolling patients from the United States were identified in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Enrollment trends were analyzed for major racial/ethnic groups. Prostate cancer incidence data from the SEER registry were used to identify enrollment targets. The enrollment difference was determined by calculating the absolute difference between the percent of a racial/ethnic subgroup in the SEER registry population and the percent of that subgroup in the phase III prostate cancer trial population. RESULTS: Among 39 studies identified African American enrollment in therapeutic trials increased across the study period (p <0.001). The enrollment difference for African Americans was -9.0% (95% CI -7.6- -10.5, p <0.001) in 2003 to 2005 and 1.4% (95% CI 0.2-2.6, p = 0.020) in 2012 to 2014. However, African American men were under enrolled in metastatic disease trials (enrollment difference -5.8%, 95% CI -4.8- -6.8, p <0.001). Latino and Asian American men were consistently under enrolled in all trial types. CONCLUSIONS: Minority groups in the United States were largely under enrolled in phase III prostate cancer trials between 2003 and 2014. While recruitment efforts may have had an impact, as demonstrated by increased enrollment of African American men, there remains a need to expand recruitment efforts to achieve diversity in trials.
Authors: Emily M Rencsok; Latifa A Bazzi; Rana R McKay; Franklin W Huang; Adam Friedant; Jake Vinson; Samuel Peisch; Jelani C Zarif; Stacey Simmons; Kelly Hawthorne; Paul Villanti; Philip W Kantoff; Elisabeth Heath; Daniel J George; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Elliott Freudenburg; Iyla Bagheri; Sunay Srinivas; Ariza Martinez; Nagireddy Putluri; Zachary Klaassen; Ashish M Kamat; Badrinath R Konety; William Y Kim; Lars Dyrskjøt; David J McConkey; Stephen J Freedland; Peter C Black; Siamak Daneshmand; James W F Catto; Stephen B Williams Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 2.532
Authors: Rana R McKay; Theresa Gold; Jelani C Zarif; Ilkania M Chowdhury-Paulino; Adam Friedant; Travis Gerke; Marie Grant; Kelly Hawthorne; Elisabeth Heath; Franklin W Huang; Maria D Jackson; Brandon Mahal; Osarenren Ogbeide; Kellie Paich; Camille Ragin; Emily M Rencsok; Stacey Simmons; Clayton Yates; Jake Vinson; Philip W Kantoff; Daniel J George; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: JCO Glob Oncol Date: 2021-04
Authors: Hala T Borno; Brian M Bakke; Celia Kaplan; Anke Hebig-Prophet; Jessica Chao; Yoon-Ji Kim; Jan Yeager; Pelin Cinar; Eric Small; Christy Boscardin; Ralph Gonzales Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2019-11-07
Authors: Jean Coquet; Nicolas Bievre; Vincent Billaut; Martin Seneviratne; Christopher J Magnani; Selen Bozkurt; James D Brooks; Tina Hernandez-Boussard Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-01-04
Authors: Joshua D Wallach; Yihong Deng; Rozalina G McCoy; Sanket S Dhruva; Jeph Herrin; Alyssa Berkowitz; Eric C Polley; Kenneth Quinto; Charu Gandotra; William Crown; Peter Noseworthy; Xiaoxi Yao; Nilay D Shah; Joseph S Ross; Timothy D Lyon Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-10-01
Authors: Jana McHugh; Edward J Saunders; Tokhir Dadaev; Eva McGrowder; Elizabeth Bancroft; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Rosalind Eeles Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2021-12-18 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: Leena Choi; Cole Beck; Elizabeth McNeer; Hannah L Weeks; Michael L Williams; Nathan T James; Xinnan Niu; Bassel W Abou-Khalil; Kelly A Birdwell; Dan M Roden; C Michael Stein; Cosmin A Bejan; Joshua C Denny; Sara L Van Driest Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Christopher J Magnani; Jecca R Steinberg; Cécile I Harmange; Xinyuan Zhang; Conor Driscoll; Alexander Bell; Jeffrey Larson; Jonathan G You; Brannon T Weeks; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Brandon E Turner; James D Brooks Journal: J Urol Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 7.450