Literature DB >> 35699798

Race reporting and disparities regarding clinical trials in bladder cancer: a systematic review.

Elliott Freudenburg1, Iyla Bagheri1, Sunay Srinivas1, Ariza Martinez1, Nagireddy Putluri2, Zachary Klaassen3, Ashish M Kamat4, Badrinath R Konety5, William Y Kim6,7, Lars Dyrskjøt8, David J McConkey9, Stephen J Freedland10, Peter C Black11, Siamak Daneshmand12, James W F Catto13, Stephen B Williams14.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature to investigate racial disparities among bladder cancer clinical trial enrollees.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using Ovid, MEDLINE® to identify clinical trials between 1970 and 2020. Articles were reviewed and were included if they assessed race in their outcomes reporting among bladder cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement.
RESULTS: We identified 544 clinical trials meeting our initial search criteria, with only 24 (4.4%) studies reporting racial demographic data. Enrollees were largely Caucasian (81-98%), with a strikingly small proportion of enrolled patients consisting of African-Americans (2-8%) and Hispanics (2-5%). Only one of the studies reported results on the efficacy and safety/tolerability of the tested treatment separately for racial groups and performed analyses stratified by race.
CONCLUSION: Race is poorly studied in bladder cancer clinical trials. Trial cohorts may not reflect multicultural populations. The potential association between race and efficacy, safety or tolerability of the tested interventions is unknown. Given the up to twofold increase in bladder cancer-specific death among African-Americans, further research is needed to address the impact of race in clinical trials, while encompassing socioeconomic factors and disease risk factor exposures.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder Cancer; Clinical Trials; Disparities; Race; Reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35699798     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-022-01593-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.532


  45 in total

1.  Underrepresentation of women, elderly patients, and racial minorities in the randomized trials used for cardiovascular guidelines.

Authors:  Muhammad Rizwan Sardar; Marwan Badri; Catherine T Prince; Jonathan Seltzer; Peter R Kowey
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Impact of tumor, treatment, and access on outcomes in bladder cancer: Can equal access overcome race-based differences in survival?

Authors:  Alexander P Cole; Sean A Fletcher; Sebastian Berg; Junaid Nabi; Brandon A Mahal; Guru P Sonpavde; Paul L Nguyen; Stuart R Lipsitz; Maxine Sun; Toni K Choueiri; Mark A Preston; Adam S Kibel; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Racial disparities in urologic health care.

Authors:  John B Klein; Carvell T Nguyen; Lateef Saffore; Charles Modlin; Charles S Modlin
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Ethnic differences in bladder cancer survival.

Authors:  David S Yee; Nicole M Ishill; William T Lowrance; Harry W Herr; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  A randomized trial of intravesical doxorubicin and immunotherapy with bacille Calmette-Guérin for transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  D L Lamm; B A Blumenstein; E D Crawford; J E Montie; P Scardino; H B Grossman; T H Stanisic; J A Smith; J Sullivan; M F Sarosdy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-10-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Survival experience of black patients and white patients with bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  George R Prout; Margaret N Wesley; Peter G McCarron; Vivien W Chen; Raymond S Greenberg; Robert M Mayberry; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Peter Jüni; David Moher; Andrew D Oxman; Jelena Savovic; Kenneth F Schulz; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-18

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Larissa Shamseer; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-01

Review 10.  Physician Workforce Disparities and Patient Care: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Julie K Silver; Allison C Bean; Chloe Slocum; Julie A Poorman; Adam Tenforde; Cheri A Blauwet; Rebecca A Kirch; Ranna Parekh; Hermioni L Amonoo; Ross Zafonte; David Osterbur
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2019-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.