Literature DB >> 30217784

Estimating testosterone concentrations in adolescent girls: Comparison of two direct immunoassays to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Christopher R McCartney1, Christine M Burt Solorzano2, James T Patrie3, John C Marshall4, Daniel J Haisenleder4.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The appropriate role of direct total testosterone (T) immunoassays in reproductive research is controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the concordance between two direct immunoassays and a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for total T in adolescent girls with measured concentrations < 50 ng/dl.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adolescent girls (age 8.4-18.1 years) participating in clinical research protocols. INTERVENTION: Paired blood samples were obtained for total T by LC-MS/MS (n = 66; Mayo Clinic Laboratory) and by direct immunoassay (Center for Research in Reproduction)-either radioimmunoassay (RIA; n = 31) or chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA; n = 35). At the time of assay, laboratories were unaware that results would be compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Measurement agreement between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS.
RESULTS: Measured T concentrations (LC-MS/MS) were <7 to 44 ng/dl. The average difference between RIA and LC-MS/MS was 0.84 [-0.89, 2.56] ng/dl (mean [95% confidence interval]). RIA correlated very strongly with LC-MS/MS (r = 0.899; p < 0.0001); and both Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis suggested no bias. The average difference between chemiluminescence and LC-MS/MS was 1.39 [-0.83, 3.60] ng/dl. CLIA correlated strongly with LC-MS/MS (r = 0.806; p < 0.0001). While Bland-Altman analysis suggested no systematic bias, Deming regression analysis suggested that, as measured values increased, values obtained by CLIA tended to be progressively, albeit only modestly, higher than those obtained by LC-MS/MS.
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of rigorously-performed and carefully-validated direct T immunoassays in high-quality endocrine research in peripubertal adolescent girls.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemiluminescence; Immunoassay; Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; Radioimmunoassay; Testosterone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30217784      PMCID: PMC7017602          DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2018.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Steroids        ISSN: 0039-128X            Impact factor:   2.668


  16 in total

1.  Measurement of total serum testosterone in adult men: comparison of current laboratory methods versus liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Christina Wang; Don H Catlin; Laurence M Demers; Borislav Starcevic; Ronald S Swerdloff
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Requirement for mass spectrometry sex steroid assays in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.

Authors:  D J Handelsman; L Wartofsky
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Pre-analytical issues for testosterone and estradiol assays.

Authors:  Hershel Raff; Patrick M Sluss
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.668

4.  Progesterone-Mediated Inhibition of the GnRH Pulse Generator: Differential Sensitivity as a Function of Sleep Status.

Authors:  Su Hee Kim; Jessica A Lundgren; Ruchi Bhabhra; Jessicah S Collins; James T Patrie; Christine M Burt Solorzano; John C Marshall; Christopher R McCartney
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Editorial: The new instructions to authors for the reporting of steroid hormone measurements.

Authors:  Margaret E Wierman; Richard J Auchus; Daniel J Haisenleder; Janet E Hall; David Handelsman; Susan Hankinson; William Rosner; Ravinder J Singh; Patrick M Sluss; Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 6.  Mass spectrometry, immunoassay and valid steroid measurements in reproductive medicine and science.

Authors:  David J Handelsman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Steroid assays and endocrinology: best practices for basic scientists.

Authors:  Richard J Auchus
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.736

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Position statement: Utility, limitations, and pitfalls in measuring testosterone: an Endocrine Society position statement.

Authors:  William Rosner; Richard J Auchus; Ricardo Azziz; Patrick M Sluss; Hershel Raff
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Interlaboratory comparison study of serum total testosterone [corrected] measurements performed by mass spectrometry methods.

Authors:  Hubert W Vesper; Shalender Bhasin; Christina Wang; Susan S Tai; Larry A Dodge; Ravinder J Singh; Judie Nelson; Susan Ohorodnik; Nigel J Clarke; Wael A Salameh; C Richard Parker; Raj Razdan; Elizabeth A Monsell; Gary L Myers
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.668

View more
  1 in total

1.  De Novo and Depot-Specific Androgen Production in Human Adipose Tissue: A Source of Hyperandrogenism in Women with Obesity.

Authors:  Isabel Viola Wagner; Iuliia Savchuk; Lena Sahlin; Alexandra Kulle; Nora Klöting; Arne Dietrich; Paul-Martin Holterhus; Jörg Dötsch; Matthias Blüher; Olle Söder
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.807

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.