Su Hee Kim1,2, Jessica A Lundgren1,2, Ruchi Bhabhra1,2, Jessicah S Collins1,2, James T Patrie3, Christine M Burt Solorzano1,4, John C Marshall1,2, Christopher R McCartney1,2. 1. Center for Research in Reproduction, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. 2. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. 4. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Abstract
Context: During normal, early puberty, luteinizing hormone (LH) pulse frequency is low while awake but increases during sleep. Mechanisms underlying such changes are unclear, but a small study in early pubertal girls suggested that differential wake-sleep sensitivity to progesterone negative feedback plays a role. Objective: To test the hypothesis that progesterone acutely reduces waking LH pulse frequency more than sleep-associated pulse frequency in late pubertal girls. Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded crossover study. Setting: Academic clinical research unit. Participants: Eleven normal, postmenarcheal girls, ages 12 to 15 years. Intervention: Subjects completed two 18-hour admissions in separate menstrual cycles (cycle days 6 to 11). Frequent blood sampling for LH assessment was performed at 1800 to 1200 hours; sleep was encouraged at 2300 to 0700 hours. Either oral micronized progesterone (0.8 mg/kg/dose) or placebo was given at 0700, 1500, 2300, and 0700 hours, before and during the first admission. A second admission, performed at least 2 months later, was identical to the first except that placebo was exchanged for progesterone or vice versa (treatment crossover). Main Outcome Measures: LH pulse frequency during waking and sleeping hours. Results:Progesterone reduced waking LH pulse frequency by 26% (P = 0.019), with no change observed during sleep (P = 0.314). The interaction between treatment condition (progesterone vs placebo) and sleep status (wake vs sleep) was highly significant (P = 0.007). Conclusions: In late pubertal girls, progesterone acutely reduced waking LH pulse frequency more than sleep-associated pulse frequency. Differential wake-sleep sensitivity to progesterone negative feedback may direct sleep-wake LH pulse frequency changes across puberty.
RCT Entities:
Context: During normal, early puberty, luteinizing hormone (LH) pulse frequency is low while awake but increases during sleep. Mechanisms underlying such changes are unclear, but a small study in early pubertal girls suggested that differential wake-sleep sensitivity to progesterone negative feedback plays a role. Objective: To test the hypothesis that progesterone acutely reduces waking LH pulse frequency more than sleep-associated pulse frequency in late pubertal girls. Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded crossover study. Setting: Academic clinical research unit. Participants: Eleven normal, postmenarcheal girls, ages 12 to 15 years. Intervention: Subjects completed two 18-hour admissions in separate menstrual cycles (cycle days 6 to 11). Frequent blood sampling for LH assessment was performed at 1800 to 1200 hours; sleep was encouraged at 2300 to 0700 hours. Either oral micronized progesterone (0.8 mg/kg/dose) or placebo was given at 0700, 1500, 2300, and 0700 hours, before and during the first admission. A second admission, performed at least 2 months later, was identical to the first except that placebo was exchanged for progesterone or vice versa (treatment crossover). Main Outcome Measures: LH pulse frequency during waking and sleeping hours. Results:Progesterone reduced waking LH pulse frequency by 26% (P = 0.019), with no change observed during sleep (P = 0.314). The interaction between treatment condition (progesterone vs placebo) and sleep status (wake vs sleep) was highly significant (P = 0.007). Conclusions: In late pubertal girls, progesterone acutely reduced waking LH pulse frequency more than sleep-associated pulse frequency. Differential wake-sleep sensitivity to progesterone negative feedback may direct sleep-wake LH pulse frequency changes across puberty.
Authors: Christopher R McCartney; Melissa B Gingrich; Yun Hu; William S Evans; John C Marshall Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Christopher R McCartney; Susan K Blank; Kathleen A Prendergast; Sandhya Chhabra; Christine A Eagleson; Kristin D Helm; Richard Yoo; R Jeffrey Chang; Carol M Foster; Sonia Caprio; John C Marshall Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Margaret E Wierman; Richard J Auchus; Daniel J Haisenleder; Janet E Hall; David Handelsman; Susan Hankinson; William Rosner; Ravinder J Singh; Patrick M Sluss; Frank Z Stanczyk Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Christopher R McCartney; Christine M Burt Solorzano; James T Patrie; John C Marshall; Daniel J Haisenleder Journal: Steroids Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Bob Z Sun; Tairmae Kangarloo; Judith M Adams; Patrick Sluss; Donald W Chandler; David T Zava; John A McGrath; David M Umbach; Natalie D Shaw Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Christopher R McCartney; Rebecca E Campbell; John C Marshall; Suzanne M Moenter Journal: J Neuroendocrinol Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 3.870