Literature DB >> 19851263

Effects of previous abdominal surgery incision type on complications and conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Metin Ercan1, Erdal Birol Bostanci, Murat Ulas, Ilter Ozer, Yusuf Ozogul, Canbek Seven, Fuat Atalay, Musa Akoglu.   

Abstract

For laparoscopic cholecystectomy, previous abdominal operations are seen as a relative contraindication. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the incision type of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of complications and conversion to open surgery. Data from 677 patients who had previously undergone abdominal surgery before undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were prospectively collected and evaluated. From the previous operations, the incisions were upper abdominal in 66 patients, lower abdominal in 567, and upper plus lower in 44. Conversion rates in the upper, lower and upper plus lower groups were 27.27%, 2.82%, and 25%, respectively. Intraoperative major complications were bile duct injury (1 patient, upper plus lower incision group), small bowel mesentery injury, and aortic injury (1 patient each, both in the lower incision group). Postoperative major intra-abdominal complications were duodenal injury (1 patient, upper incision group) and small intestine injury (1 patient, lower incision group). The lower abdominal incision group had fewer adhesions in the upper abdomen than did the other 2 groups, and as a result had a much lower conversion rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19851263     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181b92935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  7 in total

1.  Multivariable analysis of cholecystectomy after gastrectomy: laparoscopy is a feasible initial approach even in the presence of common bile duct stones or acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Joohyun Kim; Jeong Nam Cho; Sun Hyung Joo; Bum Soo Kim; Sang Mok Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Management of acute cholecystitis in cancer patients: a comparative effectiveness approach.

Authors:  Thejus T Jayakrishnan; Ryan T Groeschl; Ben George; James P Thomas; Sam Pappas; T Clark Gamblin; Kiran K Turaga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Effects of prior abdominal surgery on laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Deniz Atasoy; Afag Aghayeva; İpek Sapcı; Onur Bayraktar; Turgut Bora Cengiz; Bilgi Baca
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2018-08-28

4.  Timing of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with sphincterotomy: a prospective observational study of 308 patients.

Authors:  Erdal Birol Bostanci; Metin Ercan; Ilter Ozer; Zafer Teke; Erkan Parlak; Musa Akoglu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations.

Authors:  Volkan Genc; Marlen Sulaimanov; Gokhan Cipe; Salim Ilksen Basceken; Nezih Erverdi; Mehmet Gurel; Nusret Aras; Selcuk M Hazinedaroglu
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Evaluation of affecting factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Erkan Oymaci; Ahmet Deniz Ucar; Serdar Aydogan; Erdem Sari; Nazif Erkan; Mehmet Yildirim
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-30

7.  Is Previous Upper Abdominal Surgery a Contraindication for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Mehmet Kağan Katar; Pamir Eren Ersoy
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.