Literature DB >> 30214913

A New Anthropomorphic Pediatric Spine Phantom for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing.

Dana J Lewis1,2,3, Paige A Taylor1,2,3, David S Followill1,2,3, Narayan Sahoo2,3, Anita Mahajan3,4, Francesco C Stingo3,5, Stephen F Kry1,2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To design and evaluate an anthropomorphic spine phantom for use in credentialing proton therapy facilities for clinical trial participation by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston QA Center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom was designed to perform an end-to-end audit of the proton spine treatment process, including simulation, dose calculation, and proton treatment delivery. Because plastics that simulate bone in proton beams are unknown, 11 potential materials were tested to identify suitable phantom materials. Once built, preliminary testing using passive scattering and spot scanning treatment plans (including a field junction) were created in-house and delivered 3 times to test reproducibility. The following measured attributes were compared with the calculated values: absolute dose agreement using thermoluminescent dosimeters, planar gamma agreement, distal range, junction match, and right and left profile alignment using radiochromic film. Finally, credentialing results from 10 institutions were also assessed.
RESULTS: A suitable bone substitute was identified (Techtron HPV Bearing Grade), which had a measured relative stopping power that agreed within 1.1% of its value calculated by Eclipse. In-house passive scatter testing of the phantom demonstrated that the phantom was suitable for assessing craniospinal irradiation dose delivery. However, the in-house scanning beam results were more mixed, highlighting challenges in treatment delivery. Seven of ten institutions passed the proposed criteria for this phantom, a pass rate consistent with other Imaging and Radiation Oncology phantoms.
CONCLUSIONS: An anthropomorphic proton spine phantom was developed to evaluate proton therapy delivery. This phantom provides a realistic challenge for centers wishing to participate in proton clinical trials and highlights the need for caution in applying advanced treatments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IROC; QA; clinical trials; proton; quality assurance

Year:  2018        PMID: 30214913      PMCID: PMC6132268          DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-17-00024.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Part Ther        ISSN: 2331-5180


  12 in total

1.  Nuclear interactions in proton therapy: dose and relative biological effect distributions originating from primary and secondary particles.

Authors:  H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Uncertainty analysis of absorbed dose calculations from thermoluminescence dosimeters.

Authors:  T H Kirby; W F Hanson; D A Johnston
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Gafchromic EBT film dosimetry in proton beams.

Authors:  Li Zhao; Indra J Das
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Energy dependence and dose response of Gafchromic EBT2 film over a wide range of photon, electron, and proton beam energies.

Authors:  Bijan Arjomandy; Ramesh Tailor; Aman Anand; Narayan Sahoo; Michael Gillin; Karl Prado; Milos Vicic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Effect of inhomogeneity in a patient's body on the accuracy of the pencil beam algorithm in comparison to Monte Carlo.

Authors:  T Yamashita; T Akagi; T Aso; A Kimura; T Sasaki
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Pencil Beam Algorithms Are Unsuitable for Proton Dose Calculations in Lung.

Authors:  Paige A Taylor; Stephen F Kry; David S Followill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing.

Authors:  Paige A Taylor; Stephen F Kry; Paola Alvarez; Tyler Keith; Carrie Lujano; Nadia Hernandez; David S Followill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Ion stopping powers and CT numbers.

Authors:  Michael F Moyers; Milind Sardesai; Sean Sun; Daniel W Miller
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.482

9.  Comparison of therapeutic dosimetric data from passively scattered proton and photon craniospinal irradiations for medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Annelise Giebeler; Wendi Koontz-Raisig; Anita Mahajan; Carol J Etzel; Anthony M D'Amelio; Kenneth L Homann; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Relative stopping power measurements to aid in the design of anthropomorphic phantoms for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ryan L Grant; Paige A Summers; James L Neihart; Anthony P Blatnica; Narayan Sahoo; Michael T Gillin; David S Followill; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Value of On-Site Proton Audits.

Authors:  Paige A Taylor; Jessica Lowenstein; David Followill; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Advances in radiotherapy technology for pediatric cancer patients and roles of medical physicists: COG and SIOP Europe perspectives.

Authors:  Chia-Ho Hua; Anthony E Mascia; Enrica Seravalli; Antony J Lomax; Klaus Seiersen; Kenneth Ulin
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 3.167

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.