Literature DB >> 23123683

Effect of inhomogeneity in a patient's body on the accuracy of the pencil beam algorithm in comparison to Monte Carlo.

T Yamashita1, T Akagi, T Aso, A Kimura, T Sasaki.   

Abstract

The pencil beam algorithm (PBA) is reasonably accurate and fast. It is, therefore, the primary method used in routine clinical treatment planning for proton radiotherapy; still, it needs to be validated for use in highly inhomogeneous regions. In our investigation of the effect of patient inhomogeneity, PBA was compared with Monte Carlo (MC). A software framework was developed for the MC simulation of radiotherapy based on Geant4. Anatomical sites selected for the comparison were the head/neck, liver, lung and pelvis region. The dose distributions calculated by the two methods in selected examples were compared, as well as a dose volume histogram (DVH) derived from the dose distributions. The comparison of the off-center ratio (OCR) at the iso-center showed good agreement between the PBA and MC, while discrepancies were seen around the distal fall-off regions. While MC showed a fine structure on the OCR in the distal fall-off region, the PBA showed smoother distribution. The fine structures in MC calculation appeared downstream of very low-density regions. Comparison of DVHs showed that most of the target volumes were similarly covered, while some OARs located around the distal region received a higher dose when calculated by MC than the PBA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23123683     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/22/7673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  Density overwrites of internal tumor volumes in intensity modulated proton therapy plans for mobile lung tumors.

Authors:  Pablo Botas; Clemens Grassberger; Gregory Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Site-specific range uncertainties caused by dose calculation algorithms for proton therapy.

Authors:  J Schuemann; S Dowdell; C Grassberger; C H Min; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Quantification of proton dose calculation accuracy in the lung.

Authors:  Clemens Grassberger; Juliane Daartz; Stephen Dowdell; Thomas Ruggieri; Greg Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Clinical Monte Carlo versus Pencil Beam Treatment Planning in Nasopharyngeal Patients Receiving IMPT.

Authors:  Balu Krishna Sasidharan; Saif Aljabab; Jatinder Saini; Tony Wong; George Laramore; Jay Liao; Upendra Parvathaneni; Stephen R Bowen
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2019-04-18

5.  A New Anthropomorphic Pediatric Spine Phantom for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing.

Authors:  Dana J Lewis; Paige A Taylor; David S Followill; Narayan Sahoo; Anita Mahajan; Francesco C Stingo; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-07-26

6.  Heterogeneity correction for intensity-modulated frameless SRS in pituitary and cavernous sinus tumors: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Lisa B E Shields; Cindy Bond; Aaron Odom; David A Sun; Aaron C Spalding
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Commissioning and initial stereotactic ablative radiotherapy experience with Vero.

Authors:  Timothy D Solberg; Paul M Medin; Ezequiel Ramirez; Chuxiong Ding; Ryan D Foster; John Yordy
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Proton range verification in inhomogeneous tissue: Treatment planning system vs. measurement vs. Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Dae-Hyun Kim; Sungkoo Cho; Kwanghyun Jo; EunHyuk Shin; Chae-Seon Hong; Youngyih Han; Tae-Suk Suh; Do Hoon Lim; Doo Ho Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using a realistic lung phantom.

Authors:  Andries N Schreuder; Daniel S Bridges; Lauren Rigsby; Marc Blakey; Martin Janson; Samantha G Hedrick; John B Wilkinson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.