Literature DB >> 30214492

The influence of age and unreported symptoms on the Oxford Shoulder Score.

John Dabis1, Henry B Colaço1, Helen Hingston1, Magnus Arnander1, Duncan Tennent1, Eyiyemi O Pearse1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One potential limitation of interpreting the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) in longitudinal studies is that the observed score may be influenced by age and other variables, which may change over time. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of increasing age and unreported non-shoulder upper limb and neck symptoms on the OSS.
METHODS: We collected OSS data from a sample of our ethnically diverse local population. All subjects indicated whether they suffered from any neck, shoulder, elbow or wrist symptoms for which they had not sought a medical opinion. Those reporting no symptoms formed the asymptomatic group.
RESULTS: We found a significant decline in OSS with increasing age in the whole study population, as well as in both the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups with previously unreported symptoms: Spearman correlation coefficient = -0.27, -0.28 and -0.33 respectively (p < 0.001). The median OSS in the asymptomatic group was 48 [interquartile range (IQR) 48 to 48]. This was significantly higher than the symptomatic group, with a median OSS of 46 (IQR 40 to 47) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We found the OSS to be affected by non-shoulder upper-limb and neck pathology as well as age. Within the limitations of the OSS, the differences we found do not exceed the minimal important change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oxford Shoulder Score; age; influence; noise; non-shoulder upper limb

Year:  2017        PMID: 30214492      PMCID: PMC6134527          DOI: 10.1177/1758573217738137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  10 in total

1.  The range of the Oxford Shoulder Score in the asymptomatic population: a marker for post-operative improvement.

Authors:  F Younis; J Sultan; S Dix; P J Hughes
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The Oxford shoulder score revisited.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Katherine Rogers; Ray Fitzpatrick; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG)

Authors:  P L Hudak; P C Amadio; C Bombardier
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Epidemiologic surveillance of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in the working population.

Authors:  Yves Roquelaure; Catherine Ha; Annette Leclerc; Annie Touranchet; Marine Sauteron; Maria Melchior; Ellen Imbernon; Marcel Goldberg
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-10-15

5.  Normalization of the Constant score.

Authors:  Leonid I Katolik; Anthony A Romeo; Brian J Cole; Nikhil N Verma; Jennifer K Hayden; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  The Constant score in normal shoulders.

Authors:  Edward H Yian; Aarun J Ramappa; Oernulf Arneberg; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-07

8.  Oxford shoulder score in a normal population.

Authors:  Nicholas David Clement; Charles M Court-Brown
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2014-01

9.  Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Authors:  Derk A van Kampen; W Jaap Willems; Loes W A H van Beers; Rene M Castelein; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Eric Bohm; Patricia Franklin; Stephen Lyman; Geke Denissen; Jill Dawson; Jennifer Dunn; Kate Eresian Chenok; Michael Dunbar; Søren Overgaard; Göran Garellick; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Value-based healthcare analysis of shoulder surgery for patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears - Calculating the impact of arthroscopic cuff repair.

Authors:  C Holzer-Fleming; A Tavakkolizadeh; J Sinha; J Casey; J Moxham; Toby J Colegate-Stone
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.