Literature DB >> 30213648

Between-session reliability of opto-electronic motion capture in measuring sagittal posture and 3-D ranges of motion of the thoracolumbar spine.

Seyed Javad Mousavi1, Rebecca Tromp2, Matthew C Swann2, Andrew P White1, Dennis E Anderson3.   

Abstract

This study evaluated between-session reliability of opto-electronic motion capture to measure trunk posture and three-dimensional ranges of motion (ROM). Nineteen healthy participants aged 24-74 years underwent spine curvature, pelvic tilt and trunk ROM measurements on two separate occasions. Rigid four-marker clusters were attached to the skin overlying seven spinous processes, plus single markers on pelvis landmarks. Rigid body rotations of spine marker clusters were calculated to determine neutral posture and ROM in flexion, extension, total lateral bending (left-right) and total axial rotation (left-right). Segmental spine ROM values were in line with previous reports using opto-electronic motion capture. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated as measures of between-session reliability and measurement error, respectively. Retroreflective markers showed fair to excellent between-session reliability to measure thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt (ICC = 0.82, 0.63, and 0.54, respectively). Thoracic and lumbar segments showed highest reliabilities in total axial rotation (ICC = 0.78) and flexion-extension (ICC = 0.77-0.79) ROM, respectively. Pelvic segment showed highest ICC values in flexion (ICC = 0.78) and total axial rotation (ICC = 0.81) trials. Furthermore, it was estimated that four or fewer repeated trials would provide good reliability for key ROM outcomes, including lumbar flexion, thoracic and lumbar lateral bending, and thoracic axial rotation. This demonstration of reliability is a necessary precursor to quantifying spine kinematics in clinical studies, including assessing changes due to clinical treatment or disease progression.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kinematics; Motion analysis; Repeatability; Spine curvature; Trunk

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30213648      PMCID: PMC6193559          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  22 in total

1.  Implications for the use of postural analysis as a clinical diagnostic tool: reliability of quantifying upright standing spinal postures from photographic images.

Authors:  Nadine M Dunk; Jennifer Lalonde; Jack P Callaghan
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Novel 3-dimensional motion analysis method for measuring the lumbar spine range of motion: repeatability and reliability compared with an electrogoniometer.

Authors:  Michio Tojima; Naoshi Ogata; Arito Yozu; Masahiko Sumitani; Nobuhiko Haga
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Repeatability of kinematic and electromyographical measures during standing and trunk motion: how many trials are sufficient?

Authors:  Alison Schinkel-Ivy; Stephen DiMonte; Janessa D M Drake
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Multi-segmental thoracic spine kinematics measured dynamically in the young and elderly during flexion.

Authors:  Dominika Ignasiak; Andrea Rüeger; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Should a standing or seated reference posture be used when normalizing seated spine kinematics?

Authors:  Brendan D Cotter; Brian C Nairn; Janessa D M Drake
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Between-day reliability of three-dimensional motion analysis of the trunk: A comparison of marker based protocols.

Authors:  Fabian Marcel Rast; Eveline Silvia Graf; André Meichtry; Jan Kool; Christoph Michael Bauer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Reliability and validity of a kinematic spine model during active trunk movement in healthy subjects and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Benjamin Hidalgo; Maxime Gilliaux; William Poncin; Christine Detrembleur
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Bryan A Comstock; William Hollingworth; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Using Skin Markers for Spinal Curvature Quantification in Main Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Explorative Radiographic Study.

Authors:  Stefan Schmid; Daniel Studer; Carol-Claudius Hasler; Jacqueline Romkes; William R Taylor; Reinald Brunner; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Soft tissue artefacts of the human back: comparison of the sagittal curvature of the spine measured using skin markers and an open upright MRI.

Authors:  Roland Zemp; Renate List; Turgut Gülay; Jean Pierre Elsig; Jaroslav Naxera; William R Taylor; Silvio Lorenzetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of the Active Measurement Systems of the Thoracic Range of Movements of the Spine: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Esteban-González; Eleuterio A Sánchez-Romero; Jorge Hugo Villafañe
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.847

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.