Literature DB >> 25661241

Repeatability of kinematic and electromyographical measures during standing and trunk motion: how many trials are sufficient?

Alison Schinkel-Ivy1, Stephen DiMonte1, Janessa D M Drake2.   

Abstract

Previous studies have recommended a minimum of five trials to produce repeatable kinematic and electromyography (EMG) measures during target postures or contraction levels. This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reliability of kinematic and EMG measures that are of primary interest in the investigation of trunk movement, and to determine the number of trials required to achieve repeatability and reliability for these measures. Thirty participants performed ten trials of upright standing and maximum trunk ranges-of-motion. Mean (upright standing) and maximum (movement tasks) kinematic and EMG measures were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients and standard error of measurement, which were used to identify the minimum number of trials for each measure. The repeatability and reliability of the measures were generally high, with 64%, 77%, 85%, and 92% of measures producing repeatable and reliable values with two, three, four, and five trials, respectively. Ten trials were not sufficient for several upright standing angle measures and maximum twist lumbar angles. Further, several abdominal muscles during maximum flexion, as well as the left lower-thoracic erector spinae during maximum twist, required as many as five trials. These measures were typically those with very small amounts of motion, or muscles that did not act in the role of prime mover. These results suggest that as few as two trials may be sufficient for many of the kinematic and EMG measures of primary interest in the investigation of trunk movement, while the collection of four trials should produce repeatable and reliable values for over 80% of measures. These recommendations are intended to provide an acceptable trade-off between repeatable and reliable values and feasibility of the collection protocol.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromyography; Kinematics; Reliability; Repeatability; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25661241     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  3 in total

1.  Between-session reliability of opto-electronic motion capture in measuring sagittal posture and 3-D ranges of motion of the thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  Seyed Javad Mousavi; Rebecca Tromp; Matthew C Swann; Andrew P White; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Inter-day reliability of surface electromyography recordings of the lumbar part of erector spinae longissimus and trapezius descendens during box lifting.

Authors:  Mikkel Brandt; Lars Louis Andersen; Afshin Samani; Markus Due Jakobsen; Pascal Madeleine
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Comparison of EMG activity and blood flow during graded exertion in the orbicularis oris muscle of adult subjects with and without lip incompetence: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Jun-Ichi Takada; Jun J Miyamoto; Chiemi Sato; Ayano Dei; Keiji Moriyama
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.