Literature DB >> 30209957

Determination of mammographic breast density using a deep convolutional neural network.

Alexander Ciritsis1, Cristina Rossi1, Ilaria Vittoria De Martini1, Matthias Eberhard1, Magda Marcon1, Anton S Becker1, Nicole Berger1, Andreas Boss1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High breast density is a risk factor for breast cancer. The aim of this study was to develop a deep convolutional neural network (dCNN) for the automatic classification of breast density based on the mammographic appearance of the tissue according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS) Atlas.
METHODS: In this study, 20,578 mammography single views from 5221 different patients (58.3 ± 11.5 years) were downloaded from the picture archiving and communications system of our institution and automatically sorted according to the ACR density (a-d) provided by the corresponding radiological reports. A dCNN with 11 convolutional layers and 3 fully connected layers was trained and validated on an augmented dataset. The model was finally tested on two different datasets against: i) the radiological reports and ii) the consensus decision of two human readers. None of the test datasets was part of the dataset used for the training and validation of the algorithm.
RESULTS: The optimal number of epochs was 91 for medio-lateral oblique (MLO) projections and 94 for cranio-caudal projections (CC), respectively. Accuracy for MLO projections obtained on the validation dataset was 90.9% (CC: 90.1%). Tested on the first test dataset of mammographies (850 MLO and 880 CC), the algorithm showed an accordance with the corresponding radiological reports of 71.7% for MLO and of 71.0% for CC. The agreement with the radiological reports improved in the differentiation between dense and fatty breast for both projections (MLO = 88.6% and CC = 89.9%). In the second test dataset of 200 mammographies, a good accordance was found between the consensus decision of the two readers on both, the MLO-model (92.2%) and the right craniocaudal-model (87.4%). In the differentiation between fatty (ACR A/B) and dense breasts (ACR C/D), the agreement reached 99% for the MLO and 96% for the CC projections, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The dCNN allows for accurate classification of breast density based on the ACR BI-RADS system. The proposed technique may allow accurate, standardized, and observer independent breast density evaluation of mammographies. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Standardized classification of mammographies by a dCNN could lead to a reduction of falsely classified breast densities, thereby allowing for a more accurate breast cancer risk assessment for the individual patient and a more reliable decision, whether additional ultrasound is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30209957      PMCID: PMC6435091          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  25 in total

1.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.

Authors:  W A Berg; C Campassi; P Langenberg; M J Sexton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Viktor E Bovbjerg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification.

Authors:  Stefano Ciatto; Daniela Bernardi; Massimo Calabrese; Manuela Durando; Maria Adalgisa Gentilini; Giovanna Mariscotti; Francesco Monetti; Enrica Moriconi; Barbara Pesce; Antonella Roselli; Carmen Stevanin; Margherita Tapparelli; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 4.  Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Joy Melnikow; Joshua J Fenton; Evelyn P Whitlock; Diana L Miglioretti; Meghan S Weyrich; Jamie H Thompson; Kunal Shah
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.

Authors:  Ernest U Ekpo; Ujong Peter Ujong; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Reliability of Computer-Assisted Breast Density Estimation: Comparison of Interactive Thresholding, Semiautomated, and Fully Automated Methods.

Authors:  Eunyoung Kang; Eung-Jik Lee; Mijung Jang; Sun Mi Kim; Youngwoo Kim; Minsoo Chun; Joo Ho Tai; Wonshik Han; Sung-Won Kim; Jong Hyo Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation.

Authors:  Charlotte C Gard; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Diana L Miglioretti; Stephen H Taplin; Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories.

Authors:  Aly A Mohamed; Wendie A Berg; Hong Peng; Yahong Luo; Rachel C Jankowitz; Shandong Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Rikke Rass Winkel; My von Euler-Chelpin; Mads Nielsen; Pengfei Diao; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Wei Yao Uldall; Ilse Vejborg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Current strategies for the prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Pooja Advani; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2014-05-02
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Ravi K Samala; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Research on Online Social Network Information Leakage-Tracking Algorithm Based on Deep Learning.

Authors:  Shuhe Han
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  Detecting Abnormal Axillary Lymph Nodes on Mammograms Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Frederik Abel; Anna Landsmann; Patryk Hejduk; Carlotta Ruppert; Karol Borkowski; Alexander Ciritsis; Cristina Rossi; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-29

4.  Multichannel DenseNet Architecture for Classification of Mammographic Breast Density for Breast Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Shivaji D Pawar; Kamal K Sharma; Suhas G Sapate; Geetanjali Y Yadav; Roobaea Alroobaea; Sabah M Alzahrani; Mustapha Hedabou
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  Breast density in dedicated breast computed tomography: Proposal of a classification system and interreader reliability.

Authors:  Jann Wieler; Nicole Berger; Thomas Frauenfelder; Magda Marcon; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Deep learning for the standardized classification of Ki-67 in vulva carcinoma: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Matthias Choschzick; Mariam Alyahiaoui; Alexander Ciritsis; Cristina Rossi; André Gut; Patryk Hejduk; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-07-15

7.  A convolutional deep learning model for improving mammographic breast-microcalcification diagnosis.

Authors:  Daesung Kang; Hye Mi Gweon; Na Lae Eun; Ji Hyun Youk; Jeong-Ah Kim; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence in mammographic phenotyping of breast cancer risk: a narrative review.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Shyam Desai; Vinayak S Ahluwalia; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 8.408

9.  Fully automatic classification of breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement using a transfer learning approach.

Authors:  Karol Borkowski; Cristina Rossi; Alexander Ciritsis; Magda Marcon; Patryk Hejduk; Sonja Stieb; Andreas Boss; Nicole Berger
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Applied Machine Learning in Spiral Breast-CT: Can We Train a Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic, Standardized and Observer Independent Classification of Breast Density?

Authors:  Anna Landsmann; Jann Wieler; Patryk Hejduk; Alexander Ciritsis; Karol Borkowski; Cristina Rossi; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.