Literature DB >> 30209518

[Multipoint pacing-more CRT or a waste of battery power?]

J Müller-Leisse1, C Zormpas1, T König1, D Duncker1, C Veltmann2.   

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with broad QRS complex ≥130 ms and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction despite optimal guideline-directed medical therapy. However, approximately 30% of the patients implanted with a CRT system do not show clinical benefit. Reasons for nonresponse are complex and some aspects can be addressed during follow-up. Based on quadripolar lead technology, multipoint pacing (MPP) allows left ventricular stimulation at two different sites along the lead. In particular, in scarred and fibrotic ventricular myocardium stimulation at two different sites may overcome conduction barriers and lead to homogeneous ventricular depolarization. Especially for patients that do not respond to conventional CRT, activation of MPP may present an option to increase clinical response. On the other hand, MPP may significantly decrease battery longevity.This review offers an overview of the current knowledge and data on MPP balancing the potential clinical benefit and the possible disadvantages of this therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRT nonresponder; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Lead technology; Ventricular dysfunction, left

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30209518     DOI: 10.1007/s00059-018-4751-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  39 in total

1.  A randomized double-blind crossover trial of triventricular versus biventricular pacing in heart failure.

Authors:  Dominic P S Rogers; Pier D Lambiase; Martin D Lowe; Anthony W C Chow
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 15.534

2.  Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Behar; Julian Bostock; Matthew Ginks; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Simon Claridge; Reza Razavi; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  QRS morphology, left ventricular lead location, and clinical outcome in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Gaurav A Upadhyay; Robert K Altman; Kimberly A Parks; Mary Orencole; Theofanie Mela; E Kevin Heist; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Avoiding non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a practical guide.

Authors:  Claude Daubert; Nathalie Behar; Raphaël P Martins; Philippe Mabo; Christophe Leclercq
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Safety and Efficacy of Multipoint Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The MultiPoint Pacing Trial.

Authors:  Imran Niazi; James Baker; Raffaele Corbisiero; Charles Love; David Martin; Robert Sheppard; Seth J Worley; Niraj Varma; Kwangdeok Lee; Gery Tomassoni
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-09-27

6.  Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year.

Authors:  Francesco Zanon; Lina Marcantoni; Enrico Baracca; Gianni Pastore; Daniela Lanza; Chiara Fraccaro; Claudio Picariello; Luca Conte; Silvio Aggio; Loris Roncon; Domenico Pacetta; Nima Badie; Franco Noventa; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Triple-site versus standard cardiac resynchronization therapy study (TRUST CRT): clinical rationale, design, and implementation.

Authors:  Radosław Lenarczyk; Oskar Kowalski; Beata Sredniawa; Patrycja Pruszkowska-Skrzep; Sławomir Pluta; Adam Sokal; Tomasz Kukulski; Joanna Stabryła-Deska; Aleksandra Woźniak; Jacek Kowalczyk; Teresa Zielińska; Michał Mazurek; Witold Streb; Marian Zembala; Zbigniew Kalarus
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-06

8.  Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program.

Authors:  Wilfried Mullens; Richard A Grimm; Tanya Verga; Thomas Dresing; Randall C Starling; Bruce L Wilkoff; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy by multipoint pacing improves response of left ventricular mechanics and fluid dynamics: a three-dimensional and particle image velocimetry echo study.

Authors:  Mariachiara Siciliano; Federico Migliore; Luigi Badano; Emanuele Bertaglia; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Stefano Cavedon; Alessandro Zorzi; Domenico Corrado; Sabino Iliceto; Denisa Muraru
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Michael R Gold; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green; Jagmeet P Singh; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Yinghong Yu; Timothy E Meyer; Milan Seth; Patrick J Tchou
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy with multipoint pacing via quadripolar lead versus traditional biventricular pacing: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies on hemodynamic, clinical, and prognostic parameters.

Authors:  Cristiano Massacesi; Laura Ceriello; Fabrizio Maturo; Annamaria Porreca; Marianna Appignani; Enrico Di Girolamo
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-12-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.