| Literature DB >> 30208583 |
Kyung-Sook Bang1, Sungjae Kim2, Min Kyung Song3, Kyung Im Kang4, Yeaseul Jeong5.
Abstract
As problems relating to children's health increase, forest therapy has been proposed as an alternative. This study examined the effects of a combined health promotion program, using urban forests and nursing student mentors, on the perceived and psychosocial health of upper-grade elementary students. The quasi-experimental study ran from June to August 2017, with 52 upper-grade elementary students from five community after-school centers. With a purposive sampling, they were assigned to either an experimental group (n = 24), who received a 10-session health promotion program, or to a control group (n = 28). Seven undergraduate nursing students participated as mentors. Running over 10 weeks, each weekly session consisted of 30 min of health education and 60 min of urban forest activities. Data were analyzed by independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, paired t-test, or Wilcoxon signed rank test. General characteristics and outcome variables of both groups were homogeneous. The experimental group showed significant improvement in self-esteem (p = 0.030) and a significant decrease in depressive symptoms (p = 0.020) after the intervention, compared to the control group. These results suggest that forest healing programs may contribute to the spread of health promotion programs that make use of nature.Entities:
Keywords: forests; health promotion; mentors; school-aged children
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30208583 PMCID: PMC6163462 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15091977
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Recruitment of participants.
The topics of program sessions.
| Session | Lecture | Forest Therapy | Program Duration (hours) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Program orientation | 2 | |
| 2 | Understanding the relationship between physical and psychosocial health | Making a nickname for natural objects that resemble me | 2 |
| 3 | Personal hygiene and eating habits | Physical activities in forest (I) | 2 |
| 4 | Internet overdependence | Playing with natural materials (I) | 2 |
| 5 | Forest day camp (I) | 4 | |
| 6 | Self-emotion awareness and expression | Playing with natural materials (II) | 2 |
| 7 | Self-esteem | Self-expression activities with natural materials | 2 |
| 8 | Communication and peer relationships | Physical activities in forest (II) | 2 |
| 9 | Forest day camp (II) | 4 | |
| 10 | Completion ceremony | 2 | |
Homogeneity test of participants’ demographic characteristics and outcome variables during the pre-test (N = 52).
| Characteristics/Variables | Categories | Exp. ( | Cont. ( | χ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 11.83 ± 0.82 | 11.75 ± 0.97 | 0.33 | 0.741 † | |
| Gender | Male | 8 (33.3) | 14 (50.0) | 1.47 | 0.225 ‡ |
| Female | 16 (66.7) | 14 (50.0) | |||
| Grade | 4th | 10 (41.7) | 11 (39.3) | 0.09 | 0.958 ‡ |
| 5th | 8 (33.3) | 9 (32.1) | |||
| 6th | 6 (25.0) | 8 (28.6) | |||
| Perceived health status | 4.04 ± 0.95 | 3.68 ± 1.12 | −1.31 | 0.191 § | |
| Self-esteem | 31.42 ± 5.48 | 31.86 ± 5.06 | −0.04 | 0.971 § | |
| Depression | 12.26 ± 7.99 | 9.39 ± 7.27 | −1.33 | 0.184 § | |
| Peer relationships | 79.27 ± 12.34 | 78.54 ± 13.77 | 0.20 | 0.845 † | |
| Attention deficit and hyperactivity | 15.09 ± 9.26 | 14.85 ± 11.57 | −0.66 | 0.507 § | |
| LF/HF ratio | 1.02 ± 0.58 | 1.67 ± 1.38 | −1.83 | 0.068 § | |
Exp.: experimental group; Cont.: control group; LF: low frequency; HF: high frequency; M: mean; SD: standard deviation; † t-test; ‡ χ2 test; § Mann-Whitney U-test.
Comparisons of changes in outcome variables between the experimental and control groups (N = 52).
| Variables | Group | Pre-Test |
|
| t or Z |
| ES |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived health status | Exp. | 4.04 ± 0.95 | 4.21 ± 0.83 | 0.17 ± 0.96 | 0.76 | 0.449 ‡ | 0.15 |
| Cont. | 3.48 ± 1.12 | 3.86 ± 0.97 | 0.18 ± 1.22 | 0.62 | 0.538 ‡ | 0.12 | |
| Self-esteem | Exp. | 31.42 ± 5.48 | 33.21 ± 4.35 | 1.79 ± 3.79 | 2.32 | 0.030 † | 0.47 |
| Cont. | 31.86 ± 5.06 | 30.43 ± 5.03 | −1.43 ± 4.73 | −1.12 | 0.265 ‡ | −0.21 | |
| Depression | Exp. | 12.26 ± 7.99 | 9.67 ± 6.44 | −2.74 ± 5.55 | −2.32 | 0.020 ‡ | −0.48 |
| Cont. | 9.39 ± 7.27 | 8.57 ± 6.86 | −0.82 ± 4.44 | −0.63 | 0.531 ‡ | −0.12 | |
| Peer relationships | Exp. | 79.27 ± 12.34 | 78.96 ± 11.11 | −0.43 ± 12.34 | −0.16 | 0.875 † | −0.03 |
| Cont. | 78.54 ± 13.77 | 80.36 ± 13.40 | 1.82 ± 9.10 | 1.19 | 0.236 ‡ | 0.22 | |
| Attention deficit and hyperactivity | Exp. | 15.09 ± 9.26 | 15.58 ± 11.99 | 0.22 ± 7.50 | 0.14 | 0.891 † | 0.03 |
| Cont. | 14.85 ± 11.57 | 14.14 ± 9.77 | −0.48 ± 9.85 | −0.25 | 0.802 † | −0.05 | |
| LF/HF ratio | Exp. | 1.02 ± 0.58 | 1.05 ± 0.61 | 0.03 ± 0.71 | 0.19 | 0.849 † | 0.04 |
| Cont. | 1.67 ± 1.38 | 1.45 ± 0.95 | −0.22 ± 0.98 | −1.20 | 0.241 † | −0.23 | |
Exp.: experimental group; Cont.: control group; LF: low frequency; HF: high frequency; M: mean; SD: standard deviation; ES: effect size; † paired t-test; ‡ Wilcoxon signed rank test.