A C K Lee1, R Maheswaran. 1. Section of Public Health, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK. andrew.lee@shef.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Urban development projects can be costly and have health impacts. An evidence-based approach to urban planning is therefore essential. However, the evidence for physical and non-physical health benefits of urban green space is unclear. METHODS: A literature search of academic and grey literature was conducted for studies and reviews of the health effects of green space. Articles found were appraised for their relevance, critically reviewed and graded accordingly. Their findings were then thematically categorized. RESULTS: There is weak evidence for the links between physical, mental health and well-being, and urban green space. Environmental factors such as the quality and accessibility of green space affects its use for physical activity. User determinants, such as age, gender, ethnicity and the perception of safety, are also important. However, many studies were limited by poor study design, failure to exclude confounding, bias or reverse causality and weak statistical associations. CONCLUSION: Most studies reported findings that generally supported the view that green space have a beneficial health effect. Establishing a causal relationship is difficult, as the relationship is complex. Simplistic urban interventions may therefore fail to address the underlying determinants of urban health that are not remediable by landscape redesign.
BACKGROUND: Urban development projects can be costly and have health impacts. An evidence-based approach to urban planning is therefore essential. However, the evidence for physical and non-physical health benefits of urban green space is unclear. METHODS: A literature search of academic and grey literature was conducted for studies and reviews of the health effects of green space. Articles found were appraised for their relevance, critically reviewed and graded accordingly. Their findings were then thematically categorized. RESULTS: There is weak evidence for the links between physical, mental health and well-being, and urban green space. Environmental factors such as the quality and accessibility of green space affects its use for physical activity. User determinants, such as age, gender, ethnicity and the perception of safety, are also important. However, many studies were limited by poor study design, failure to exclude confounding, bias or reverse causality and weak statistical associations. CONCLUSION: Most studies reported findings that generally supported the view that green space have a beneficial health effect. Establishing a causal relationship is difficult, as the relationship is complex. Simplistic urban interventions may therefore fail to address the underlying determinants of urban health that are not remediable by landscape redesign.
Authors: Charles C Branas; Rose A Cheney; John M MacDonald; Vicky W Tam; Tara D Jackson; Thomas R Ten Have Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Laura E Jackson; Jessica Daniel; Betsy McCorkle; Alexandra Sears; Kathleen F Bush Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Peter James; Jaime E Hart; J Aaron Hipp; Jonathan A Mitchell; Jacqueline Kerr; Philip M Hurvitz; Karen Glanz; Francine Laden Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Spruha Joshi; Stephen J Mooney; Andrew G Rundle; James W Quinn; John R Beard; Magdalena Cerdá Journal: Health Place Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Benjamin Y Ofori; Reuben A Garshong; Francis Gbogbo; Erasmus H Owusu; Daniel K Attuquayefio Journal: Environ Monit Assess Date: 2018-07-21 Impact factor: 2.513
Authors: Emma Curran; Gary Adamson; Michael Rosato; Paul De Cock; Gerard Leavey Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Peter James; Marta Jankowska; Christine Marx; Jaime E Hart; David Berrigan; Jacqueline Kerr; Philip M Hurvitz; J Aaron Hipp; Francine Laden Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 5.043