| Literature DB >> 30208577 |
Si-Yu Zhou1, Yi-Jie Hu2, Fan-Cheng Meng3, Shen-Yue Qu4, Rui Wang5, Raymond J Andersen6, Zhi-Hua Liao7, Min Chen8.
Abstract
Seven long-chain amides, including five previously undescribed bacillamidins A⁻E (1⁻5) and two previously reported synthetic analogs, bacillamidins F (6) and G (7), were isolated from extracts of the marine-derived Bacillus pumilus strain RJA1515. The structures of the new compounds were established by extensive analysis of 1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data as well as high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), and the absolute configurations of the stereogenic carbons of 1⁻4 were established by comparison of the calculated and the experimental electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra. The cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of 1⁻7 were evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus pumilus; antimicrobial activity; cytotoxic activity; long-chain amides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30208577 PMCID: PMC6164710 DOI: 10.3390/md16090326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structures of 1–7.
1H and 13C NMR data (400 and 100 MHz, in DMSO-d) of 1 and 2.
| Position | 1 | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-NH | 8.31, d (7.6) | 8.42, d (7.6) | ||
| 2 | 172.2, CO | 172.2, CO | ||
| 3 | 2.08, t (7.6) | 34.9, CH2 | 2.08, t (7.6) | 34.9, CH2 |
| 4 | 1.48, m | 25.1, CH2 | 1.47, m | 25.1, CH2 |
| 5 | 1.23, m | 28.4, CH2 | 1.23, m | 28.4, CH2 |
| 6 | 1.23, m | 28.7, CH2 | 1.23, m | 28.7, CH2 |
| 7 | 1.23, m | 29.2, CH2 | 1.23, m | 28.9, CH2 |
| 8 | 1.23, m | 26.7, CH2 | 1.23, m | 29.3, CH2 |
| 9 | 1.13, m | 38.4, CH2 | 1.23, m | 26.4, CH2 |
| 10 | 1.48, m | 27.4, CH | 1.09, m; 1.27, m | 36.0, CH2 |
| 11 | 0.84, d (6.4) | 22.5, CH3 | 1.30, m | 33.7, CH |
| 12 | 0.84, d (6.4) | 22.5, CH3 | 1.10, m | 29.0, CH2 |
| 13 | 0.83, t (9.0) | 11.2, CH3 | ||
| 14 | 0.78, d (9.0) | 19.1, CH3 | ||
| 1′ | 4.60, ddd (9.6, 7.6, 6.0) | 48.4, CH | 4.60, ddd (9.6, 7.6, 6.0) | 48.4, CH |
| 2′ | 2.79, dd (16.4, 9.6) | 35.6, CH2 | 2.79, dd (16.4, 9.6) | 35.6, CH2 |
| 2.67, dd (16.4, 6.0) | 2.67, dd (16.4, 6.0) | |||
| 3′ | 171.2, CO | 171.3, CO | ||
| 3′-OCH3 | 3.61, s | 51.6, OCH3 | 3.61, s | 51.6, OCH3 |
| 1″ | 170.4, CO | 170.4, CO | ||
| 1″-OCH3 | 3.60, s | 52.0, OCH3 | 3.60, s | 52.1, OCH3 |
Figure 2Key 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations for 1 and 2.
Figure 3Comparison of the experimental and the calculated ECD spectra of 1.
Figure 4Comparison of the experimental and the calculated ECD spectra of 2.
1H and 13C-NMR data (400 and 100 MHz, in DMSO-d) of 3 and 4.
| Position | 3 | 4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-NH | 8.42, d (7.6) | 8.51, d (7.6) | ||
| 2 | 172.5, CO | 172.6, CO | ||
| 3 | 2.08, t (7.6) | 34.9, CH2 | 2.08, t (7.6) | 34.8, CH2 |
| 4 | 1.23, m | 25.0, CH2 | 1.48, m | 25.0, CH2 |
| 5 | 1.23, m | 28.5, CH2 | 1.23, m | 28.4, CH2 |
| 6 | 1.23, m | 28.8, CH2 | 1.23, m | 28.8, CH2 |
| 7 | 1.23, m | 29.0, CH2 | 1.23, m | 29.2, CH2 |
| 8 | 1.23, m | 29.3, CH2 | 1.23, m | 26.7, CH2 |
| 9 | 1.23, m | 26.5, CH2 | 1.13, m | 38.4, CH2 |
| 10 | 1.09, m; 1.27, m | 36.2, CH2 | 1.48, m | 27.4, CH |
| 11 | 1.30, m | 33.7, CH | 0.83, d (6.6) | 22.5, CH3 |
| 12 | 1.10, m | 29.0, CH2 | 0.83, d (6.6) | 22.5, CH3 |
| 13 | 0.83, t (9.0) | 11.2, CH3 | ||
| 14 | 0.78, d (9.0) | 19.1, CH3 | ||
| 1′ | 4.35, ddd (9.6, 7.6, 6.0) | 49.5, CH | 4.35, ddd (9.6, 7.6, 6.0) | 48.4, CH |
| 2′ | 177.7, CO | 176.5, CO | ||
| 3′-NH | 11.19, s | |||
| 4′ | 176.4, CO | 175.2, CO | ||
| 5′ | 2.84, dd (16.4, 9.6) | 36.0, CH2 | 2.91, dd (16.4, 9.6) | 34.8, CH2 |
| 2.53, dd (16.4, 6.0) | 2.53, dd (16.4, 6.0) | |||
| 1″ | 3.19, d (7.2) | 45.4, CH2 | ||
| 2″ | 1.90, m | 26.7, CH | ||
| 3″ | 0.84, d (6.6) | 20.0, CH3 | ||
| 4″ | 0.84, d (6.6) | 20.0, CH3 | ||
Figure 5Key 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations for 3 and 4.
Figure 6Comparison of the experimental and the calculated ECD spectra of 3.
Figure 7Comparison of the experimental and the calculated ECD spectra of 4.
1H and 13C-NMR data (400 and 100 MHz, in DMSO-d) of 5.
| Position | 5 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | |||||
| 1-NH | 8.34, d (6.8) | 1″ | 0.80, d (6.4) | 21.3, CH3 | |
| 2 | 171.9, CO | 2″ | 0.88, d (6.4) | 23.3, CH3 | |
| 3 | 1.90, t (7.6) | 35.0, CH2 | 3″ | 1.56, m | 24.0, CH |
| 4 | 1.48, m | 24.9, CH2 | 4″ | 1.32, m | 38.4, CH2 |
| 5-10 | 1.25, m | 28.5–29.2 | 1.68, m | ||
| 11 | 1.25, m | 29.3, CH2 | 5″ | 4.19, dddd (3.6, 7.6, 10.4, 13.6) | 48.3, CH |
| 12 | 1.25, m | 26.7, CH2 | 6″-NH | 7.94, d (9.6) | |
| 13 | 1.13, m | 38.4, CH2 | 7″ | 169.8, CO | |
| 14 | 1.49, m | 27.4, CH | 8″ | 4.27, dd (6.0, 2.4) | 71.6, CH |
| 15 | 0.83, d, (6.6) | 22.5, CH3 | 8″-OH | 6.18, d (6.0) | |
| 16 | 0.83, d, (6.6) | 22.5, CH3 | 9″ | 4.61, dd (2.4, 2.0) | 85.7, CH |
| 1′ | 168.9, CO | 10″ | 4.32, m | 46.1, CH | |
| 3′ | 4.69, ddd (10.4, 8.0, 2.8) | 80.8, CH | 11″ | 2.16, dd (18.0, 2.2) | 36.0, CH2 |
| 4′ | 2.87, m | 29.0, CH2 | 2.85, m | ||
| 5′ | 6.82, d (7.6) | 118.5, CH | 12″ | 175.6, CO | |
| 6′ | 7.48, dd (8.4, 7.6) | 136.2, CH | |||
| 7′ | 6.84, d (8.4) | 115.2, CH | |||
| 8′ | 160.8, C | ||||
| 8″-OH | 10.79, s | ||||
| 9′ | 108.3, C | ||||
| 10′ | 140.4, C | ||||
Figure 8Key 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations for 5.
Figure 9Key 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations for 6 and 7.
Antimicrobial activity of 1–7 (MIC, μg/mL).
| Compounds |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 64 | 58 | >128 |
|
| 64 | 64 | >128 |
|
| 64 | 64 | >128 |
|
| 64 | 58 | >128 |
|
| >128 | >128 | >128 |
|
| >128 | >128 | >128 |
|
| >128 | >128 | >128 |
| ofloxacin | 8 | 16 | 1 |