Literature DB >> 30203229

Binding free energies in the SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with MM and QM methods.

Octav Caldararu1, Martin A Olsson1, Majda Misini Ignjatović1, Meiting Wang1, Ulf Ryde2.   

Abstract

We have estimated free energies for the binding of eight carboxylate ligands to two variants of the octa-acid deep-cavity host in the SAMPL6 blind-test challenge (with or without endo methyl groups on the four upper-rim benzoate groups, OAM and OAH, respectively). We employed free-energy perturbation (FEP) for relative binding energies at the molecular mechanics (MM) and the combined quantum mechanical (QM) and MM (QM/MM) levels, the latter obtained with the reference-potential approach with QM/MM sampling for the MM → QM/MM FEP. The semiempirical QM method PM6-DH+ was employed for the ligand in the latter calculations. Moreover, binding free energies were also estimated from QM/MM optimised structures, combined with COSMO-RS estimates of the solvation energy and thermostatistical corrections from MM frequencies. They were performed at the PM6-DH+ level of theory with the full host and guest molecule in the QM system (and also four water molecules in the geometry optimisations) for 10-20 snapshots from molecular dynamics simulations of the complex. Finally, the structure with the lowest free energy was recalculated using the dispersion-corrected density-functional theory method TPSS-D3, for both the structure and the energy. The two FEP approaches gave similar results (PM6-DH+/MM slightly better for OAM), which were among the five submissions with the best performance in the challenge and gave the best results without any fit to data from the SAMPL5 challenge, with mean absolute deviations (MAD) of 2.4-5.2 kJ/mol and a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.77-0.93. This is the first time QM/MM approaches give binding free energies that are competitive to those obtained with MM for the octa-acid host. The QM/MM-optimised structures gave somewhat worse performance (MAD = 3-8 kJ/mol and R2 = 0.1-0.9), but the results were improved compared to previous studies of this system with similar methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Density functional theory; Entropy; Free-energy perturbation; Ligand binding; Reference-potential with QM/MM sampling; Semiempirical methods

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30203229     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0158-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  61 in total

1.  Soft-core potentials in thermodynamic integration: comparing one- and two-step transformations.

Authors:  Thomas Steinbrecher; InSuk Joung; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Practical Aspects of Free-Energy Calculations: A Review.

Authors:  Niels Hansen; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Phase-space overlap measures. I. Fail-safe bias detection in free energies calculated by molecular simulation.

Authors:  Di Wu; David A Kofke
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Density functional theory augmented with an empirical dispersion term. Interaction energies and geometries of 80 noncovalent complexes compared with ab initio quantum mechanics calculations.

Authors:  Petr Jurecka; Jirí Cerný; Pavel Hobza; Dennis R Salahub
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory.

Authors:  Stefan Grimme; Stephan Ehrlich; Lars Goerigk
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  An efficient and near linear scaling pair natural orbital based local coupled cluster method.

Authors:  Christoph Riplinger; Frank Neese
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Coupled-cluster interaction energies for 200-atom host-guest systems.

Authors:  Milica Andrejić; Ulf Ryde; Ricardo A Mata; Pär Söderhjelm
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.102

8.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Statistical mechanics and molecular dynamics in evaluating thermodynamic properties of biomolecular recognition.

Authors:  Jeff Wereszczynski; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 10.  Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael W Chiu; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  6 in total

1.  SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.

Authors:  Zhaoxi Sun; Qiaole He; Xiao Li; Zhengdan Zhu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Obtaining QM/MM binding free energies in the SAMPL8 drugs of abuse challenge: indirect approaches.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; Félix Aviat; Rubén Meana-Pañeda; Luke Warrensford; Benjamin C Pollard; Samarjeet Prasad; Michael R Jones; H Lee Woodcock; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 4.179

3.  Use of Interaction Energies in QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; H Lee Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding affinities from extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations.

Authors:  Zhe Huai; Huaiyu Yang; Xiao Li; Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding poses and binding affinities from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.

Authors:  Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  SAMPL7: Host-guest binding prediction by molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics.

Authors:  Yiğitcan Eken; Nuno M S Almeida; Cong Wang; Angela K Wilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.686

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.