Literature DB >> 30202267

The Influence of Exercise on Perceived Pain and Disability in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Jarrett Slater1,2,3, Morey J Kolber1,2,3, Kristen C Schellhase1,2,3, Chetan K Patel1,2,3, Carey E Rothschild1,2,3, Xinliang Liu1,2,3, William J Hanney1,2,3.   

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is an increasingly prevalent condition that has major health and economic implications. While there are many options for the treatment of LSS, exercise is widely considered a first-line intervention as it is associated with reduced complications and cost as compared to more invasive options. Currently, it is not clear if exercise is an effective approach to managing pain and perceived disability in patients with symptomatic LSS. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the published literature that has investigated exercise as a primary intervention for LSS. A search was conducted in electronic databases including PubMed, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and AMED using the key words lumbar spinal stenosis, exercise, physical therapy, rehabilitation, and conservative treatment. Inclusion criteria consisted of published randomized controlled trials written in English that included exercise as the primary treatment in at least one of the groups, and had reported measures of pain and disability clearly stated. The search identified 310 studies of which 5 met all the inclusion parameters. Exercise appears to be an efficacious intervention for pain, disability, analgesic intake, depression, anger, and mood disturbance among patients with LSS. Further research is needed to determine which type of exercise is the most effective in managing symptoms associated with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conservative Care; Exercise; Lumbar; Stenosis

Year:  2015        PMID: 30202267      PMCID: PMC6125093          DOI: 10.1177/1559827615571510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med        ISSN: 1559-8276


  41 in total

1.  Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Christopher G Maher; Catherine Sherrington; Robert D Herbert; Anne M Moseley; Mark Elkins
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2003-08

2.  A randomized clinical trial comparing two physiotherapy interventions for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jeremy S Lewis; Jane S Hewitt; Lisa Billington; Sally Cole; Jenny Byng; Sandra Karayiannis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hyun W Bae; Sean S Rajaee; Linda E Kanim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R B Keller; D Robson; R A Deyo; D E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Julie M Whitman; Timothy W Flynn; John D Childs; Robert S Wainner; Howard E Gill; Michael G Ryder; Matthew B Garber; Andrew C Bennett; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Treadmill ambulation with partial body weight support for the treatment of low back and leg pain.

Authors:  David Joffe; Mary Watkins; Linda Steiner; Bernard A Pfeifer
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Conservative and surgical treatment improves pain and ankle-brachial index in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Seiji Ohtori; Masaomi Yamashita; Yasuaki Murata; Yawara Eguchi; Yasuchika Aoki; Hiromi Ataka; Jiro Hirayama; Tomoyuki Ozawa; Tatsuo Morinaga; Hajime Arai; Masaya Mimura; Hiroto Kamoda; Sumihisa Orita; Masayuki Miyagi; Tomohiro Miyashita; Yuzuru Okamoto; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Hiroaki Sameda; Tomoaki Kinoshita; Eiji Hanaoka; Miyako Suzuki; Munetaka Suzuki; Takato Aihara; Toshinori Ito; Gen Inoue; Masatsune Yamagata; Tomoaki Toyone; Gou Kubota; Yoshihiro Sakuma; Yasuhiro Oikawa; Kazuhide Inage; Takeshi Sainoh; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Impact of missing data due to dropouts on estimates of the treatment effect in a randomized trial of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected individuals. Canadian HIV Trials Network A002 Study Group.

Authors:  J M Raboud; J S Montaner; A Thorne; J Singer; M T Schechter
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol       Date:  1996-05-01

9.  Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Zarife Koc; Suheda Ozcakir; Koncuy Sivrioglu; Alp Gurbet; Selcuk Kucukoglu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Adult participation in aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities--United States, 2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and characteristics of physiotherapy interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Federico Temporiti; Silvano Ferrari; Michael Kieser; Roberto Gatti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 2.  An Algorithmic Approach to Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Evidenced-Based Approach.

Authors:  Sudhir Diwan; Dawood Sayed; Timothy R Deer; Amber Salomons; Kevin Liang
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.750

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.