Literature DB >> 19404172

Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Zarife Koc1, Suheda Ozcakir, Koncuy Sivrioglu, Alp Gurbet, Selcuk Kucukoglu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized single-blind controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the effects of epidural steroid injections and physical therapy program on pain and function in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: LSS is one of the most common degenerative spinal disorders among elderly population. Initial treatment of this disabling painful condition is usually conservative including analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, exercise, physical therapy, or epidural steroid injections. Owing to lack of sufficient data concerning the effectiveness of conservative treatment in LSS, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of epidural steroid injections and physical therapy program in a randomized controlled manner.
METHODS: A total of 29 patients diagnosed as LSS were randomized into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 10) received an inpatient physical therapy program for 2 weeks, group 2 (n = 10) received epidural steroid injections, and group 3 (n = 9) served as the controls. All study patients additionally received diclofenac and a home-based exercise program. The patients were evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment by finger floor distance, treadmill walk test, sit-to-stand test, weight carrying test, Roland Morris Disability Index, and Nottingham Health Profile.
RESULTS: Both epidural steroid and physical therapy groups have demonstrated significant improvement in pain and functional parameters and no significant difference was noted between the 2 treatment groups. Significant improvements were also noted in the control group. Pain and functional assessment scores (RMDI, NHP physical activity subscore) were significantly more improved in group 2 compared with controls at the second week.
CONCLUSION: Epidural steroid injections and physical therapy both seem to be effective in LSS patients up to 6 months of follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404172     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c0a6b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

1.  Interlaminar epidural steroid injection for degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does the intervertebral level of performance matter?

Authors:  James Milburn; Jeffrey Freeman; Andrew Steven; Wilson Altmeyer; Dennis Kay
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 2.  Access routes and reported decision criteria for lumbar epidural drug injections: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Gustav Andreisek; Maja Jenni; Dominic Klingler; Maria Wertli; Marina Elliott; Erika J Ulbrich; Sebastian Winklhofer; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis - an initiative for structured reporting.

Authors:  Gustav Andreisek; Richard A Deyo; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Francois Porchet; Sebastian F X Winklhofer; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; Kent Stuber; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Michael Schneider; Y Raja Rampersaud; Andrea D Furlan; Carol A Kennedy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Low Back Pain, a Comprehensive Review: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  Ivan Urits; Aaron Burshtein; Medha Sharma; Lauren Testa; Peter A Gold; Vwaire Orhurhu; Omar Viswanath; Mark R Jones; Moises A Sidransky; Boris Spektor; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-03-11

6.  Epidural steroid injections are associated with less improvement in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a subgroup analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.

Authors:  Kris Radcliff; Christopher Kepler; Alan Hilibrand; Jeffrey Rihn; Wenyan Zhao; Jon Lurie; Tor Tosteson; Alexander Vaccaro; Todd Albert; James Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Three-step treadmill test and McKenzie mechanical diagnosis and therapy to establish directional preference in a patient with lumbar spinal stenosis: a case report.

Authors:  G Padmanabhan; A Sambasivan; M J Desai
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

Review 8.  Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Luciana Gazzi Macedo; Abraham Hum; Laura Kuleba; Joey Mo; Linda Truong; Mankeen Yeung; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-07-25

Review 9.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Stephane Genevay; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

10.  Evaluation of an increased strut porosity silicate-substituted calcium phosphate, SiCaP EP, as a synthetic bone graft substitute in spinal fusion surgery: a prospective, open-label study.

Authors:  Ciaran Bolger; Drew Jones; Steven Czop
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.