Literature DB >> 33403051

The added value of CA125 normalization before interval debulking surgery to the chemotherapy response score for the prognostication of ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced disease.

Wei-Feng Liang1,2, Li-Juan Wang2, Hui Li2, Chang-Hao Liu2, Miao-Fang Wu2, Jing Li2.   

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether CA125 normalization following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) can complement the chemotherapy response system (CRS) in the prognostication of patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC).
Methods: In total, 118 HGSC patients who received NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) for FIGO stage IIIC-IV disease were included, and their clinical data were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of PFS.
Results: Following NACT, CRS3 was noted in 35 patients (29.7%), and CA125 normalization (≤ 35 U/ml) was noted in 54 patients (45.8%). Both CRS3 and CA125 normalization were identified as independent prognosticators of PFS. Combining these two factors, we stratified the 106 patients into three groups with different risks of recurrence: low-risk group (CRS3 + post-NACT CA125≤ 35 U/ml; n = 17, 14.4%), intermediate-risk group (CRS3 + post-NACT CA125 > 35 U/ml; n = 19, 16.1%) and high-risk group (CRS1-2; n= 82, 69.5%). The differences in PFS between the three groups were significant (log-rank test, P < 0.0001). In Cox regression analyses, the new stratification method was found to have an independent prognostic effect.
Conclusion: Both the CRS system and the normalization of CA125 following NACT could reliably predict the risk of recurrence following primary treatment. The combination of the two factors refined the prognostic stratification of HGSC patients who were treated with NACT and IDS. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; chemotherapy; gynecologic oncology; prognosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33403051      PMCID: PMC7778530          DOI: 10.7150/jca.52711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


  36 in total

1.  Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert E Bristow; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Sean Kehoe; Jane Hook; Matthew Nankivell; Gordon C Jayson; Henry Kitchener; Tito Lopes; David Luesley; Timothy Perren; Selina Bannoo; Monica Mascarenhas; Stephen Dobbs; Sharadah Essapen; Jeremy Twigg; Jonathan Herod; Glenn McCluggage; Mahesh Parmar; Ann-Marie Swart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  TP53 K351N mutation-associated platinum resistance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Guo-nan Zhang; Hong Liu; Jian-ming Huang; Ling Wang; Jing-sha Zhao; Chao Li; Kun Mi; Yi Zhu; Jia Cheng; Xiao Zha
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease†.

Authors:  N Colombo; C Sessa; A du Bois; J Ledermann; W G McCluggage; I McNeish; P Morice; S Pignata; I Ray-Coquard; I Vergote; T Baert; I Belaroussi; A Dashora; S Olbrecht; F Planchamp; D Querleu
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Can advanced-stage ovarian cancer be cured?

Authors:  Steven Narod
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Possible use of CA-125 level normalization after the third chemotherapy cycle in deciding on chemotherapy regimen in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: brief report.

Authors:  Malgorzata E Skaznik-Wikiel; Paniti Sukumvanich; Sushil Beriwal; Kristin K Zorn; Joseph L Kelley; Scott D Richard; Thomas C Krivak
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  Platinum resistance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to primary surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Caroline C Nitschmann; Micheal J Worley; Leslie S Bradford; Ross S Berkowitz; John O Schorge; Susana M Campos; Marcela G del Carmen; Neil S Horowitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Cancer statistics in China, 2015.

Authors:  Wanqing Chen; Rongshou Zheng; Peter D Baade; Siwei Zhang; Hongmei Zeng; Freddie Bray; Ahmedin Jemal; Xue Qin Yu; Jie He
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R C Bast; T L Klug; E St John; E Jenison; J M Niloff; H Lazarus; R S Berkowitz; T Leavitt; C T Griffiths; L Parker; V R Zurawski; R C Knapp
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Pathological Chemotherapy Response Score in Patients Affected by High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: The Prognostic Role of Omental and Ovarian Residual Disease.

Authors:  Angela Santoro; Giuseppe Angelico; Alessia Piermattei; Frediano Inzani; Michele Valente; Damiano Arciuolo; Saveria Spadola; Antonino Mulè; Piercarlo Zorzato; Anna Fagotti; Giovanni Scambia; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.