Michael Guenther1, Vivien Veninga1, Joerg Kumbrink1, Michael Haas2, C Benedikt Westphalen2,3,4, Stephan Kruger2, Volker Heinemann2,3,4, Thomas Kirchner1,3, Stefan Boeck2,3,4, Andreas Jung1,3, Steffen Ormanns5. 1. Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Thalkirchner Str. 36, 80337, Munich, Germany. 2. Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. 3. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCCM), Munich, Germany. 5. Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Thalkirchner Str. 36, 80337, Munich, Germany. steffen.ormanns@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating disease, lacking relevant prognostic and predictive biomarkers. DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) has important functions in the maintenance of genetic stability during DNA replication and has previously been associated with favorable prognosis in endometrial and colorectal cancer. However, its relevance in advanced pancreatic cancer (aPDAC) has not been examined to date. METHODS: Using pyrosequencing on tumoral DNA extracted from 60 samples from the AIO-PK0104 study as well as 55 samples from completed translational trials, we examined POLE hotspot mutations in exon 9 (P286R) and exon 13 (V411R/L/M) in the POLE gene exonuclease domain. DNA extracted from 37 endometrial carcinomas were tested as positive controls. Publically available sequencing databases were searched for POLE mutations in PDAC samples. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (pts) were men, 62 pts were women, median age was 61.2 years. Median overall survival (OS) was 7.4 months and median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months. In four of the 37 endometrial carcinomas POLE mutations were detected in exon 9 (10.8%) and none in exon 13. In none of the overall 115 aPDAC tumors POLE gene hotspot mutations could be detected. CONCLUSION: Mutations in the hotspot regions of exon 9 and 13 of the POLE gene are very rare events in advanced pancreatic cancer. Thus, it is unlikely that POLE gene mutations contribute to genetic instability in the vast majority of aPDAC. POLE mutation does not serve as a relevant biomarker and should not be tested on a regular basis in PDAC.
PURPOSE:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating disease, lacking relevant prognostic and predictive biomarkers. DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) has important functions in the maintenance of genetic stability during DNA replication and has previously been associated with favorable prognosis in endometrial and colorectal cancer. However, its relevance in advanced pancreatic cancer (aPDAC) has not been examined to date. METHODS: Using pyrosequencing on tumoral DNA extracted from 60 samples from the AIO-PK0104 study as well as 55 samples from completed translational trials, we examined POLE hotspot mutations in exon 9 (P286R) and exon 13 (V411R/L/M) in the POLE gene exonuclease domain. DNA extracted from 37 endometrial carcinomas were tested as positive controls. Publically available sequencing databases were searched for POLE mutations in PDAC samples. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (pts) were men, 62 pts were women, median age was 61.2 years. Median overall survival (OS) was 7.4 months and median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months. In four of the 37 endometrial carcinomas POLE mutations were detected in exon 9 (10.8%) and none in exon 13. In none of the overall 115 aPDAC tumors POLE gene hotspot mutations could be detected. CONCLUSION: Mutations in the hotspot regions of exon 9 and 13 of the POLE gene are very rare events in advanced pancreatic cancer. Thus, it is unlikely that POLE gene mutations contribute to genetic instability in the vast majority of aPDAC. POLE mutation does not serve as a relevant biomarker and should not be tested on a regular basis in PDAC.
Authors: Volker Heinemann; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Dirk Waldschmidt; Erika Kettner; Angela Märten; Cornelia Winkelmann; Stefan Klein; Georgi Kojouharoff; Thomas C Gauler; Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal; Michael R Clemens; Michael Geissler; Tim F Greten; Susanna Hegewisch-Becker; Oleg Rubanov; Gerold Baake; Thomas Höhler; Yon D Ko; Andreas Jung; Sascha Neugebauer; Stefan Boeck Journal: Gut Date: 2012-07-07 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Enric Domingo; Luke Freeman-Mills; Emily Rayner; Mark Glaire; Sarah Briggs; Louis Vermeulen; Evelyn Fessler; Jan Paul Medema; Arnoud Boot; Hans Morreau; Tom van Wezel; Gerrit-Jan Liefers; Ragnhild A Lothe; Stine A Danielsen; Anita Sveen; Arild Nesbakken; Inti Zlobec; Alessandro Lugli; Viktor H Koelzer; Martin D Berger; Sergi Castellví-Bel; Jenifer Muñoz; Marco de Bruyn; Hans W Nijman; Marco Novelli; Kay Lawson; Dahmane Oukrif; Eleni Frangou; Peter Dutton; Sabine Tejpar; Mauro Delorenzi; Rachel Kerr; David Kerr; Ian Tomlinson; David N Church Journal: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-07-20
Authors: Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan Journal: Science Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Emily Rayner; Inge C van Gool; Claire Palles; Stephen E Kearsey; Tjalling Bosse; Ian Tomlinson; David N Church Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Maren F Hansen; Jostein Johansen; Inga Bjørnevoll; Anna E Sylvander; Kristin S Steinsbekk; Pål Sætrom; Arne K Sandvik; Finn Drabløs; Wenche Sjursen Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Michael Haas; Steffen Ormanns; Sibylle Baechmann; Anna Remold; Stephan Kruger; Christoph B Westphalen; Jens T Siveke; Patrick Wenzel; Anna Melissa Schlitter; Irene Esposito; Detlef Quietzsch; Michael R Clemens; Erika Kettner; Ruediger P Laubender; Andreas Jung; Thomas Kirchner; Stefan Boeck; Volker Heinemann Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Claire Palles; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Kimberley M Howarth; Enric Domingo; Angela M Jones; Peter Broderick; Zoe Kemp; Sarah L Spain; Estrella Guarino; Estrella Guarino Almeida; Israel Salguero; Amy Sherborne; Daniel Chubb; Luis G Carvajal-Carmona; Yusanne Ma; Kulvinder Kaur; Sara Dobbins; Ella Barclay; Maggie Gorman; Lynn Martin; Michal B Kovac; Sean Humphray; Anneke Lucassen; Christopher C Holmes; David Bentley; Peter Donnelly; Jenny Taylor; Christos Petridis; Rebecca Roylance; Elinor J Sawyer; David J Kerr; Susan Clark; Jonathan Grimes; Stephen E Kearsey; Huw J W Thomas; Gilean McVean; Richard S Houlston; Ian Tomlinson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2012-12-23 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Benjamin Garmezy; Jinesh Gheeya; Heather Y Lin; Yuefan Huang; Taebeom Kim; Xianli Jiang; Kyaw Z Thein; Patrick G Pilié; Fadl Zeineddine; Wanlin Wang; Kenna R Shaw; Jordi Rodon; John Paul Shen; Ying Yuan; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ken Chen; Timothy A Yap Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2022-02
Authors: Valentyna Kryklyva; Esther Ter Linden; Leonie I Kroeze; Richarda M de Voer; B Marion van der Kolk; Martijn W J Stommel; John J Hermans; Claudio Luchini; Laura D Wood; Ralph H Hruban; Iris D Nagtegaal; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Lodewijk A A Brosens Journal: Pancreas Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.243