Literature DB >> 28404093

Somatic POLE proofreading domain mutation, immune response, and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective, pooled biomarker study.

Enric Domingo1, Luke Freeman-Mills2, Emily Rayner2, Mark Glaire3, Sarah Briggs2, Louis Vermeulen4, Evelyn Fessler4, Jan Paul Medema4, Arnoud Boot5, Hans Morreau5, Tom van Wezel5, Gerrit-Jan Liefers6, Ragnhild A Lothe7, Stine A Danielsen7, Anita Sveen7, Arild Nesbakken8, Inti Zlobec9, Alessandro Lugli9, Viktor H Koelzer10, Martin D Berger11, Sergi Castellví-Bel12, Jenifer Muñoz12, Marco de Bruyn13, Hans W Nijman13, Marco Novelli14, Kay Lawson14, Dahmane Oukrif14, Eleni Frangou15, Peter Dutton15, Sabine Tejpar16, Mauro Delorenzi17, Rachel Kerr18, David Kerr19, Ian Tomlinson20, David N Church21.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Precision cancer medicine depends on defining distinct tumour subgroups using biomarkers that may occur at very modest frequencies. One such subgroup comprises patients with exceptionally mutated (ultramutated) cancers caused by mutations that impair DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) proofreading.
METHODS: We examined the association of POLE proofreading domain mutation with clinicopathological variables and immune response in colorectal cancers from clinical trials (VICTOR, QUASAR2, and PETACC-3) and colorectal cancer cohorts (Leiden University Medical Centre 1 and 2, Oslo 1 and 2, Bern, AMC-AJCC-II, and Epicolon-1). We subsequently investigated its association with prognosis in stage II/III colorectal cancer by Cox regression of pooled individual patient data from more than 4500 cases from these studies.
FINDINGS: Pathogenic somatic POLE mutations were detected in 66 (1·0%) of 6517 colorectal cancers, and were mutually exclusive with mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) in the 6277 cases for whom both markers were determined (none of 66 vs 833 [13·4%] of 6211; p<0·0001). Compared with cases with wild-type POLE, cases with POLE mutations were younger at diagnosis (median 54·5 years vs 67·2 years; p<0·0001), were more frequently male (50 [75·8%] of 66 vs 3577 [55·5%] of 6445; p=0·0010), more frequently had right-sided tumour location (44 [68·8%] of 64 vs 2463 [39·8%] of 6193; p<0·0001), and were diagnosed at an earlier disease stage (p=0·006, χ2 test for trend). Compared with mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) POLE wild-type tumours, POLE-mutant colorectal cancers displayed increased CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration and expression of cytotoxic T-cell markers and effector cytokines, similar in extent to that observed in immunogenic MMR-D cancers. Both POLE mutation and MMR-D were associated with significantly reduced risk of recurrence compared with MMR-P colorectal cancers in multivariable analysis (HR 0·34 [95% CI 0·11-0·76]; p=0·0060 and 0·72 [0·60-0·87]; p=0·00035), although the difference between the groups was not significant.
INTERPRETATION: POLE proofreading domain mutations identify a subset of immunogenic colorectal cancers with excellent prognosis. This association underscores the importance of rare biomarkers in precision cancer medicine, but also raises important questions about how to identify and implement them in practice. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, Academy of Medical Sciences, Health Foundation, EU, ERC, NIHR, Wellcome Trust, Dutch Cancer Society, Dutch Digestive Foundation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28404093     DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30014-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol


  99 in total

1.  Clinical Sequencing Defines the Genomic Landscape of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Rona Yaeger; Walid K Chatila; Marla D Lipsyc; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Andrea Cercek; Francisco Sanchez-Vega; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Sumit Middha; Ahmet Zehir; Mark T A Donoghue; Daoqi You; Agnes Viale; Nancy Kemeny; Neil H Segal; Zsofia K Stadler; Anna M Varghese; Ritika Kundra; Jianjiong Gao; Aijazuddin Syed; David M Hyman; Efsevia Vakiani; Neal Rosen; Barry S Taylor; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F Berger; David B Solit; Jinru Shia; Leonard Saltz; Nikolaus Schultz
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers for Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Why PD-L1 Testing May Not Be Enough.

Authors:  Benjamin A Weinberg; Joanne Xiu; Jimmy J Hwang; Anthony F Shields; Mohamed E Salem; John L Marshall
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-27

Review 3.  Colorectal cancer: genetic abnormalities, tumor progression, tumor heterogeneity, clonal evolution and tumor-initiating cells.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Elvira Pelosi; Germana Castelli
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-13

Review 4.  What We Know About Stage II and III Colon Cancer: It's Still Not Enough.

Authors:  Alberto Puccini; Martin D Berger; Wu Zhang; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.493

5.  Digital analysis and epigenetic regulation of the signature of rejection in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Viktor H Koelzer; Lena Sokol; Stefan Zahnd; Lucine Christe; Heather Dawson; Martin D Berger; Daniel Inderbitzin; Inti Zlobec; Alessandro Lugli
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 8.110

6.  POLE gene hotspot mutations in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael Guenther; Vivien Veninga; Joerg Kumbrink; Michael Haas; C Benedikt Westphalen; Stephan Kruger; Volker Heinemann; Thomas Kirchner; Stefan Boeck; Andreas Jung; Steffen Ormanns
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Comprehensive review of targeted therapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yuan-Hong Xie; Ying-Xuan Chen; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-03-20

8.  Molecular Analyses of Left- and Right-Sided Tumors in Adolescents and Young Adults with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed E Salem; Francesca Battaglin; Richard M Goldberg; Alberto Puccini; Anthony F Shields; David Arguello; W Michael Korn; John L Marshall; Axel Grothey; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-17

Review 9.  DNA repair defects and implications for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Katherine M Bever; Dung T Le
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 10.  Glioma Subclassifications and Their Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Ricky Chen; Matthew Smith-Cohn; Adam L Cohen; Howard Colman
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.