Zidan Yu1, Tiejun Zhao2, Jakob Assländer3, Riccardo Lattanzi4, Daniel K Sodickson4, Martijn A Cloos4. 1. Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI(2)R), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; The Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: Zidan.Yu@nyumc.org. 2. Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI(2)R), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., 40 Liberty Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355, USA. 3. Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI(2)R), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 4. Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI(2)R), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; The Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the motion sensitivity of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), we performed experiments with different types of motion at various time intervals during multiple scans. Additionally, we investigated the possibility to correct the motion artifacts based on redundancy in MRF data. METHODS: A radial version of the FISP-MRF sequence was used to acquire one transverse slice through the brain. Three subjects were instructed to move in different patterns (in-plane rotation, through-plane wiggle, complex movements, adjust head position, and pretend itch) during different time intervals. The potential to correct motion artifacts in MRF by removing motion-corrupted data points from the fingerprints and dictionary was evaluated. RESULTS: Morphological structures were well preserved in multi-parametric maps despite subject motion. Although the bulk T1 values were not significantly affected by motion, fine structures were blurred when in-plane motion was present during the first part of the scan. On the other hand, T2 values showed a considerable deviation from the motion-free results, especially when through-plane motion was present in the middle of the scan (-44% on average). Explicitly removing the motion-corrupted data from the scan partially restored the T2 values (-10% on average). CONCLUSION: Our experimental results showed that different kinds of motion have distinct effects on the precision and effective resolution of the parametric maps measured with MRF. Although MRF-based acquisitions can be relatively robust to motion effects occurring at the beginning or end of the sequence, relying on redundancy in the data alone is not sufficient to assure the accuracy of the multi-parametric maps in all cases.
PURPOSE: To explore the motion sensitivity of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), we performed experiments with different types of motion at various time intervals during multiple scans. Additionally, we investigated the possibility to correct the motion artifacts based on redundancy in MRF data. METHODS: A radial version of the FISP-MRF sequence was used to acquire one transverse slice through the brain. Three subjects were instructed to move in different patterns (in-plane rotation, through-plane wiggle, complex movements, adjust head position, and pretend itch) during different time intervals. The potential to correct motion artifacts in MRF by removing motion-corrupted data points from the fingerprints and dictionary was evaluated. RESULTS: Morphological structures were well preserved in multi-parametric maps despite subject motion. Although the bulk T1 values were not significantly affected by motion, fine structures were blurred when in-plane motion was present during the first part of the scan. On the other hand, T2 values showed a considerable deviation from the motion-free results, especially when through-plane motion was present in the middle of the scan (-44% on average). Explicitly removing the motion-corrupted data from the scan partially restored the T2 values (-10% on average). CONCLUSION: Our experimental results showed that different kinds of motion have distinct effects on the precision and effective resolution of the parametric maps measured with MRF. Although MRF-based acquisitions can be relatively robust to motion effects occurring at the beginning or end of the sequence, relying on redundancy in the data alone is not sufficient to assure the accuracy of the multi-parametric maps in all cases.
Authors: Bhairav Bipin Mehta; Dan Ma; Eric Yann Pierre; Yun Jiang; Simone Coppo; Mark Alan Griswold Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-05-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Li Feng; Leon Axel; Hersh Chandarana; Kai Tobias Block; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lei Qin; Peter van Gelderen; John Andrew Derbyshire; Fenghua Jin; Jongho Lee; Jacco A de Zwart; Yang Tao; Jeff H Duyn Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sen Ma; Christopher T Nguyen; Fei Han; Nan Wang; Zixin Deng; Nader Binesh; Franklin G Moser; Anthony G Christodoulou; Debiao Li Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Eva M Serrao; Dimitri A Kessler; Bruno Carmo; Lucian Beer; Kevin M Brindle; Guido Buonincontri; Ferdia A Gallagher; Fiona J Gilbert; Edmund Godfrey; Martin J Graves; Mary A McLean; Evis Sala; Rolf F Schulte; Joshua D Kaggie Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Teresa Gerhalter; Martijn Cloos; Anna M Chen; Seena Dehkharghani; Rosemary Peralta; James S Babb; Alejandro Zarate; Tamara Bushnik; Jonathan M Silver; Brian S Im; Stephen Wall; Steven Baete; Guillaume Madelin; Ivan I Kirov Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-08-19 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Jeffrey N Stout; Congyu Liao; Borjan Gagoski; Esra Abaci Turk; Henry A Feldman; Carolina Bibbo; William H Barth; Scott A Shainker; Lawrence L Wald; P Ellen Grant; Elfar Adalsteinsson Journal: Placenta Date: 2021-08-24 Impact factor: 3.287
Authors: Max H C van Riel; Zidan Yu; Shota Hodono; Ding Xia; Hersh Chandarana; Koji Fujimoto; Martijn A Cloos Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Gastão Lima da Cruz; Aurélien Bustin; Oliver Jaubert; Torben Schneider; René M Botnar; Claudia Prieto Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 4.668