Literature DB >> 30193357

Trends in Visits to Acute Care Venues for Treatment of Low-Acuity Conditions in the United States From 2008 to 2015.

Sabrina J Poon1,2, Jeremiah D Schuur1,2, Ateev Mehrotra3.   

Abstract

Importance: Over the past 2 decades, a variety of new care options have emerged for acute care, including urgent care centers, retail clinics, and telemedicine. Trends in the utilization of these newer care venues and the emergency department (ED) have not been characterized. Objective: To describe trends in visits to different acute care venues, including urgent care centers, retail clinics, telemedicine, and EDs, with a focus on visits for treatment of low-acuity conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used deidentified health plan claims data from Aetna, a large, national, commercial health plan, from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2015, with approximately 20 million insured members per study year. Descriptive analysis was performed for health plan members younger than 65 years. Data analysis was performed from December 28, 2016, to February 20, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Utilization, inflation-adjusted price, and spending associated with visits for treatment of low-acuity conditions. Low-acuity conditions were identified using diagnosis codes and included acute respiratory infections, urinary tract infections, rashes, and musculoskeletal strains.
Results: This study included 20.6 million acute care visits for treatment of low-acuity conditions over the 8-year period. Visits to the ED for the treatment of low-acuity conditions decreased by 36% (from 89 visits per 1000 members in 2008 to 57 visits per 1000 members in 2015), whereas use of non-ED venues increased by 140% (from 54 visits per 1000 members in 2008 to 131 visits per 1000 members in 2015). There was an increase in visits to all non-ED venues: urgent care centers (119% increase, from 47 visits per 1000 members in 2008 to 103 visits per 1000 members in 2015), retail clinics (214% increase, from 7 visits per 1000 members in 2008 to 22 visits per 1000 members in 2015), and telemedicine (from 0 visits in 2008 to 6 visits per 1000 members in 2015). Utilization and spending per person per year for low-acuity conditions had net increases of 31% (from 143 visits per 1000 members in 2008 to 188 visits per 1000 members in 2015) and 14% ($70 per member in 2008 to $80 per member in 2015), respectively. The increase in spending was primarily driven by a 79% increase in price per ED visit for treatment of low-acuity conditions (from $914 per visit in 2008 to $1637 per visit in 2015). Conclusions and Relevance: From 2008 to 2015, total acute care utilization for the treatment of low-acuity conditions and associated spending per member increased, and utilization of non-ED acute care venues increased rapidly. These findings suggest that patients are more likely to visit urgent care centers than EDs for the treatment of low-acuity conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30193357      PMCID: PMC6233753          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  38 in total

1.  After-hours Access of Convenient Care Clinics and Cost Savings Associated With Avoidance of Higher-Cost Sites of Care.

Authors:  Avinash Patwardhan; Jeffery Davis; Patricia Murphy; Sandra Festa Ryan
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2012-02-11

2.  Direct-To-Consumer Telehealth May Increase Access To Care But Does Not Decrease Spending.

Authors:  J Scott Ashwood; Ateev Mehrotra; David Cowling; Lori Uscher-Pines
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: opportunities and barriers.

Authors:  Ronald S Weinstein; Ana Maria Lopez; Bellal A Joseph; Kristine A Erps; Michael Holcomb; Gail P Barker; Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Market power and provider consolidation in physician markets.

Authors:  Samuel A Kleiner; William D White; Sean Lyons
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2015-01-23

5.  A profile of freestanding emergency departments in the United States, 2007.

Authors:  Ashley F Sullivan; Chethan Bachireddy; Anne P Steptoe; Justin Oldfield; Taneisha Wilson; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Reasons for Emergency Room Use Among U.S. Adults Aged 18-64: National Health Interview Survey, 2013 and 2014.

Authors:  Renee M Gindi; Lindsey I Black; Robin A Cohen
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2016-02-18

7.  CPT fee differentials and visit upcoding under Medicare Part B.

Authors:  Christopher S Brunt
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Patient-provider secure messaging in VA: variations in adoption and association with urgent care utilization.

Authors:  Stephanie L Shimada; Timothy P Hogan; Sowmya R Rao; Jeroan J Allison; Ann L Quill; Hua Feng; Barrett D Phillips; Kim M Nazi; Susan T Haidary; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  High-intensity emergency department visits increased in California, 2002-09.

Authors:  Andrew A Herring; Brian Johnson; Adit A Ginde; Carlos A Camargo; Lin Feng; Harrison J Alter; Renee Hsia
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  The geographic distribution, ownership, prices, and scope of practice at retail clinics.

Authors:  Rena Rudavsky; Craig Evan Pollack; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  25 in total

1.  Antibiotic Prescribing During Pediatric Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine Visits.

Authors:  Kristin N Ray; Zhuo Shi; Courtney A Gidengil; Sabrina J Poon; Lori Uscher-Pines; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Prevalence, Characteristics, and Costs of Urgent Care Center Membership Programs.

Authors:  Walter Hsiang; Grace Jin; Howard Forman; Daniel Wiznia
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  The Current and Future Use of Telemedicine in Infectious Diseases Practice.

Authors:  Caitlin E Coombes; Megan E Gregory
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Use of Commercial Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine by Children.

Authors:  Kristin N Ray; Zhuo Shi; Sabrina J Poon; Lori Uscher-Pines; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  Pathways to reduced emergency department and urgent care center use: Lessons from the comprehensive primary care initiative.

Authors:  Lori Timmins; Deborah Peikes; Nancy McCall
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Evidence and Implications Behind a National Decline in Primary Care Visits.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Thomas H Lee; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Trends in Pediatric Primary Care Visits Among Commercially Insured US Children, 2008-2016.

Authors:  Kristin N Ray; Zhuo Shi; Ishani Ganguli; Aarti Rao; E John Orav; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

8.  National Trends in Primary Care Visit Use and Practice Capabilities, 2008-2015.

Authors:  Aarti Rao; Zhuo Shi; Kristin N Ray; Ateev Mehrotra; Ishani Ganguli
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 9.  Antibiotic Stewardship for Older Adults in Ambulatory Care Settings: Addressing an Unmet Challenge.

Authors:  Michael S Pulia; Sara C Keller; Christopher J Crnich; Robin L P Jump; Thomas T Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Antibiotic Prescribing Variability in a Large Urgent Care Network: A New Target for Outpatient Stewardship.

Authors:  Edward Stenehjem; Anthony Wallin; Katherine E Fleming-Dutra; Whitney R Buckel; Valoree Stanfield; Kimberly D Brunisholz; Jeff Sorensen; Matthew H Samore; Raj Srivastava; Lauri A Hicks; Adam L Hersh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 20.999

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.