Literature DB >> 33258126

Pathways to reduced emergency department and urgent care center use: Lessons from the comprehensive primary care initiative.

Lori Timmins1, Deborah Peikes2, Nancy McCall3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between a large-scale, multi-payer primary care redesign-the Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) Initiative-on outpatient emergency department (ED) and urgent care center (UCC) use and to identify the types of visits that drive the overall trends observed. DATA SOURCES: Medicare claims data capturing characteristics and outcomes of 565 674 Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries attributed to 497 CPC practices and 1 165 284 beneficiaries attributed to 908 comparison practices. STUDY
DESIGN: We used an adjusted difference-in-differences framework to test the association between CPC and beneficiaries' ED and UCC use from October 2012 through December 2016. Regression models controlled for baseline practice and patient characteristics and practice-level clustering of standard errors. Our key outcomes were all-cause and primary care substitutable (PC substitutable) outpatient ED and UCC visits, and potentially primary care preventable (PPC preventable) ED visits, categorized by the New York University Emergency Department Algorithm. We used a propensity score-matched comparison group of practices that were similar to CPC practices before CPC on multiple dimensions. Both groups of practices had similar growth in ED and UCC visits in the two-year period before CPC. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Comprehensive Primary Care practices had 2% (P = .06) lower growth in all-cause ED visits than comparison practices. They had 3% (P = .02) lower growth in PC substitutable ED visits, driven by lower growth in weekday PC substitutable visits (4%, P = .002). There was 3% (P = .04) lower growth in PPC preventable ED visits with no weekday/nonweekday differential. As expected, our falsification test showed no difference in ED visits for injuries. UCC visits had 9% lower growth for both all-cause (P = .08) and PC substitutable visits (P = .07).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that greater access to the practice and more effective primary care both contributed to the lower growth in ED and UCC visits during the initiative. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency departments; Medicare savings programs; access to care; health care reform; potentially avoidable visits; potentially preventable visits; primary care; urgent care centers; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33258126      PMCID: PMC7704466          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  9 in total

1.  Emergency department use in New York City: a substitute for primary care?

Authors:  J Billings; N Parikh; T Mijanovich
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2000-11

2.  Health Care Spending and Utilization in Public and Private Medicare.

Authors:  Vilsa Curto; Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Jonathan Levin; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  Am Econ J Appl Econ       Date:  2019-04

3.  The Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: Effects On Spending, Quality, Patients, And Physicians.

Authors:  Deborah Peikes; Stacy Dale; Arkadipta Ghosh; Erin Fries Taylor; Kaylyn Swankoski; Ann S O'Malley; Timothy J Day; Nancy Duda; Pragya Singh; Grace Anglin; Laura L Sessums; Randall S Brown
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Trends in Visits to Acute Care Venues for Treatment of Low-Acuity Conditions in the United States From 2008 to 2015.

Authors:  Sabrina J Poon; Jeremiah D Schuur; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  A "Patch" to the NYU Emergency Department Visit Algorithm.

Authors:  Kenton J Johnston; Lindsay Allen; Taylor A Melanson; Stephen R Pitts
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Many emergency department visits could be managed at urgent care centers and retail clinics.

Authors:  Robin M Weinick; Rachel M Burns; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  After-hours care and its coordination with primary care in the U.S.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Divya Samuel; Amelia M Bond; Emily Carrier
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Changes in Emergency Department Use Among Young Adults After the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Dependent Coverage Provision.

Authors:  Yaa Akosa Antwi; Asako S Moriya; Kosali Simon; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Two-Year Costs and Quality in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.

Authors:  Stacy B Dale; Arkadipta Ghosh; Deborah N Peikes; Timothy J Day; Frank B Yoon; Erin Fries Taylor; Kaylyn Swankoski; Ann S O'Malley; Patrick H Conway; Rahul Rajkumar; Matthew J Press; Laura Sessums; Randall Brown
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Geographic proximity to primary care providers as a risk-assessment criterion for quality performance measures.

Authors:  Nathaniel Bell; Ana Lòpez-De Fede; Bo Cai; John Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.