Literature DB >> 23047195

A profile of freestanding emergency departments in the United States, 2007.

Ashley F Sullivan1, Chethan Bachireddy, Anne P Steptoe, Justin Oldfield, Taneisha Wilson, Carlos A Camargo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Freestanding Emergency Departments (FSEDs) have emerged as an alternative to traditional hospital-based emergency care. STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the number, basic types, distribution, and characteristics of United States (US) FSEDs in 2007.
METHODS: Combining data from the 2007 National Emergency Department Inventory-USA database, the 2007 American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Hospitals, Internet searches, and telephone calls, we established an inventory of FSEDs. We define FSEDs as emergency care facilities physically distinct from a hospital. FSEDs include "satellite" Emergency Departments (EDs), which are owned by a parent hospital, and "autonomous" EDs, which lack such an affiliation.
RESULTS: We identified 80 FSEDs operating in 2007, representing 1.6% of all US EDs; 73 (91%) in 20 states were satellite EDs, and seven (9%) in three states were autonomous EDs. Most FSEDs (92%; 95% confidence interval 83-97%) were located in urban areas, which is considerably higher than the proportion for hospital-based EDs (58%). The median distance from a satellite ED to a parent hospital ED was 10.6 miles. In 2007, FSED annual visit volumes ranged from 700 to 56,545 visits. The 2007 median visit volume was 18,769 (interquartile range 11,106-23,504; n = 52). This value did not vary by geographic region and is almost identical to the 2007 median visit volume for hospital-based EDs (18,776 visits).
CONCLUSIONS: FSEDs represent <2% of US EDs, with satellite EDs comprising a majority of all FSEDs. Most (92%) FSEDs are located in urban areas.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23047195     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  6 in total

1.  Trends in Visits to Acute Care Venues for Treatment of Low-Acuity Conditions in the United States From 2008 to 2015.

Authors:  Sabrina J Poon; Jeremiah D Schuur; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Simulation for Operational Readiness in a New Freestanding Emergency Department: Strategy and Tactics.

Authors:  Robert L Kerner; Kathleen Gallo; Michael Cassara; John DʼAngelo; Anthony Egan; John Galbraith Simmons
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.929

3.  Freestanding Emergency Department Entry and Market-level Spending on Emergency Care.

Authors:  Vivian Ho; Yingying Xu; Murtaza Akhter
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 4.  A Systematic Scoping Review on Pedagogical Strategies of Interprofessional Communication for Physicians in Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Zhi H Ong; Lorraine H E Tan; Haziratul Z B Ghazali; Yun T Ong; Jeffrey W H Koh; Rachel Z E Ang; Chermaine Bok; Min Chiam; Alexia S I Lee; Annelissa M C Chin; Jamie X Zhou; Gene W H Chan; Gayathri D Nadarajan; Lalit K R Krishna
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2021-10-16

5.  Freestanding Emergency Departments Are Associated With Higher Medicare Costs: A Longitudinal Panel Data Analysis.

Authors:  Nitish Patidar; Robert Weech-Maldonado; Stephen J O'Connor; Bisakha Sen; Jerry M Trimm; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Consolidating Emergency Department-specific Data to Enable Linkage with Large Administrative Datasets.

Authors:  Krislyn M Boggs; Maranatha M Teferi; Janice A Espinola; Ashley F Sullivan; Kohei Hasegawa; Kori S Zachrison; Margaret E Samuels-Kalow; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-10-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.