| Literature DB >> 30192778 |
Iris Callado Sanches1, Morgana Buzin2, Filipe Fernandes Conti2, Danielle da Silva Dias2, Camila Paixão Dos Santos2, Raquel Sirvente3, Vera Maria Cury Salemi3, Susana Llesuy2,4, Maria-Cláudia Irigoyen3, Kátia De Angelis2,5.
Abstract
The study aimed at evaluating the effects of combined aerobic and resistance exercise training on cardiac morphometry and function, oxidative stress and inflammatory parameters in diabetic ovariectomized rats. For this, female Wistar rats (10 weeks-old) were divided into 4 groups (n = 8): euglycemic (E), diabetic (streptozotocin, 50 mg/kg, iv) (D), diabetic ovariectomized (DO) and trained diabetic ovariectomized (TDO). The combined exercise training was performed on a treadmill and in a ladder adapted to rats (8 weeks, at 40-60% of maximal capacity). The left ventricle (LV) morphometry and function were evaluated by echocardiography. Oxidative stress and inflammatory markers were measured on ventricles tissue. The sedentary diabetic animals (D and DO) showed impaired systolic and diastolic functions, as well as increased cardiac overload, evaluated by myocardial performance index (MPI- D: 0.32 ± 0.05; DO: 0.39 ± 0.13 vs. E: 0.25 ± 0.07), in relation to E group. Systolic and MPI dysfunctions were exacerbated in DO when compared to D group. The DO group presented higher protein oxidation and TNF-α/IL-10 ratio than D groups. Glutathione redox ratio (GSH/GSSG) and IL-10 were decreased in both D and DO groups when compared to E group. Exercise training improved exercise capacity, systolic and diastolic functions and MPI (0.18±0.11). The TDO group showed reduced protein oxidation and TNF-α/IL-10 ratio and increased GSH/GSSG and IL-10 in relation to the DO group. These results showed that combined exercise training was able to attenuate the cardiac dysfunctions, probably by reducing inflammation and oxidative stress in an experimental model of diabetes and menopause.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30192778 PMCID: PMC6128534 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Body weight and glycemia in studied groups.
| E | D | DO | TDO | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 218.2±4.1 | 213.8±1.7 | 218.4±4.4 | 222.2±1.8 | <0.0001 | |
| 240.6±7.8 | 210.8±9.7 | 213.0±5.6 | 225.6±5.9 | ||
| 89.0±1.7 | 403.4±23.0 | 408.0±23.9 | 410.0±15.2 | <0.0001 | |
| 102.0±4.6 | 442.7±15.0 | 475.0±15.0 | 438.0±23.4 |
Data are reported as mean ± SEM.
* p<0.05 vs. E
# p<0.05 vs. D
†p<0.05 vs. DO
‡ p<0.05 vs. Initial in the same group.
Maximal exercise capacity in the treadmill test (running time) and in the ladder test (load) in studied groups.
| E | D | DO | TDO | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Running time (min) | 11.08±0.86 | 9.02±0.69 | 8.60±0.67 | 15.08±0.29 | <0.0001 |
| Load (% of body weight) | 203±11 | 174±10 | 168±11 | 284±10 | <0.0001 |
Data are reported as mean ± SEM.
* p<0.05 vs. E
# p<0.05 vs. D
†p<0.05 vs. DO.
Echocardiographic parameters in studied groups.
| E | D | DO | TDO | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.09±0.017 | 0.96±0.006 | 0.92±0.019 | 1.09±0.024 | <0.0001 | |
| 4.61±0.10 | 4.44±0.08 | 4.35±0.04 | 5.29±0.04 | <0.0001 | |
| 0.65±0.01 | 0.72±0.007 | 0.71±0.01 | 0.63±0.01 | <0.0001 | |
| 2.87±0.12 | 3.05±0.19 | 3.52±0.14 | 3.34±0.07 | 0.01 | |
| 0.45±0.01 | 0.37±0.02 | 0.38±0.01 | 0.47±0.02 | 0.0001 | |
| 0.45±0.01 | 0.41±0.02 | 0.38±0.02 | 0.44±0.01 | 0.01 | |
| 0.0054±0.0001 | 0.0048±0.0001 | 0.0036±0.0002 | 0.0042±0.0003 | 0.01 | |
| 23.50±0.69 | 30.83±1.04 | 31.33±1.40 | 26.5±2.09 | 0.04 | |
| 1.68±0.14 | 1.76±0.07 | 1.66±0.07 | 1.64±0.10 | 0.20 |
Data are reported as mean ± SEM. LVM: left ventricular mass; LVDIA: left ventricular cavity in diastole; FS: fractional shortening; VCF: velocity of circumferential fiber shortening; RWT: relative wall thickness; IVRT: isovolumetric relaxation time; E/A: peak E/peak A relation.
* p<0.05 vs. E
# p<0.05 vs. D
†p<0.05 vs. DO.
Fig 1Myocardial performance index (MPI) in studied groups.
* p<0.05 vs. E; # p<0.05 vs. D; †p<0.05 vs. DO.
Fig 2(A) IL-10 levels and (B) TNF-α / IL-10 ratio in cardiac tissue in studied groups. * p<0.05 vs. E; # p<0.05 vs. D; †p<0.05 vs. DO.
Oxidative stress parameters in studied groups.
| E | D | DO | TDO | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.00±0.23 | 5.94±1.59 | 13.31±3.27 | 9.63±1.48 | 0.005 | |
| 0.80±0.04 | 0.99±0.01 | 1.52±0.13 | 1.34±0.20 | 0.0009 | |
| 16.0±0.6 | 34.1±4.6 | 31.5±2.3 | 36.2±5.4 | 0.003 | |
| 32.0±3.6 | 53.4±6.5 | 55.9±8.7 | 57.1±8.6 | 0.06 | |
| 0.258±0.03 | 0.189±0.02 | 0.221±0.04 | 0.271±0.07 | 0.50 | |
| 0.024±0.005 | 0.027±0.008 | 0.038±0.005 | 0.032±0.006 | 0.55 | |
| 10.4±1.6 | 5.8±1.2 | 5.8±0.7 | 8.6±0.9 | 0.02 |
Data are reported as mean ± SEM. CARB: protein oxidation; CAT: catalase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; GSH: reduced glutathione; GSSG: oxidized glutathione.
* p<0.05 vs. E
# p<0.05 vs. D.