| Literature DB >> 17462095 |
Rogério Wichi1, Christiane Malfitano, Kaleizu Rosa, Silvia B De Souza, Vera Salemi, Cristiano Mostarda, Kátia De Angelis, Maria Claudia Irigoyen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Because cardiomyopathy is the leading cause of death in diabetic patients, the determination of myocardial function in diabetes mellitus is essential. In the present study, we provide an integrated approach, using noninvasive echocardiography and invasive hemodynamics to assess early changes in myocardial function of diabetic rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17462095 PMCID: PMC1866223 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-6-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Left ventricular function at baseline, during, and after volume overload in the control and diabetic groups.
| 136 ± 4.7 | 125 ± 6.5 | 135 ± 7 | 134 ± 6 | 139 ± 7.8 | 134 ± 8.8 | 138 ± 6 | ||
| 114 ± 6* | 116 ± 5.8* | 112 ± 5 * | 114 ± 6 * | 107 ± 10 * | 102 ± 4 * | 107 ± 10* | ||
| 4.6 ± 0.3 | 7.8 ± 0.6 | 8.0 ± 0.6 | 9.1 ± 0.56 | 11 ± 1.3 | 9 ± 1.1 | 9.4 ± 1.1 | ||
| 7.4 ± 0.2* | 9.9 ± 0.5*# | 12.3 ± 0.55*# | 11.5 ± 0.72*# | 17 ± 1.3 *#† | 16 ± 0.7 *#† | 15 ± 1.1 *#† | ||
| 350 ± 14 | 327 ± 10 | 333 ± 11.5 | 340 ± 7.5 | 352 ± 5 | 360 ± 6 | 360 ± 6 | ||
| 307 ± 8.5* | 300 ± 6 * | 300 ± 7* | 302 ± 7* | 297 ± 1.5* | 298 ± 2* | 294 ± 3.5 * | ||
| 9229 ± 463 | 8052 ± 741 | 8699 ± 653 | 8595 ± 457 | 8858 ± 504 | 9273 ± 569 | 9264 ± 603 | ||
| 6566 ± 609 * | 5861 ± 584 * | 5760 ± 770 * | 6087 ± 1017* | 5320 ± 1287 * | 5844 ± 1217* | 5712 ± 1247* | ||
| -6845 ± 379 | -6446 ± 576 | -6543 ± 600 | -6139 ± 514 | -6672 ± 646 | -6320 ± 858 | -6272 ± 707 | ||
| -4746 ± 589* | -4804 ± 580* | -4678 ± 580* | -4152 ± 694* | -3706 ± 614 * | -3557 ± 561* | -3246 ± 653* | ||
Data are reported as means ± SEM; LVSP: left ventricle systolic pressure; HR: heart rate; LVEDP: left ventricle end diastolic pressure; +dP/dt max: maximum rate of left ventricle pressure rise; -dP/dt max: maximum rate of left ventricle pressure fall; C: control group; D: diabetic group. * P ≤ 0.05 vs. controls; #P < 0.05 vs. baseline values; † P < 0.05 vs. volume overload values (2-way ANOVA).
Figure 1Left ventricle cavity (a), E-wave (EW, b), A-wave (AW, b), original record of basal left ventricle pressure (c), and +dP/dt max and -dP/dt max of left ventricle pressure (d) in control and diabetic rats.