Literature DB >> 30191261

Adaptation to visual feedback delays on touchscreens with hand vision.

Elie Cattan1, Pascal Perrier2, François Bérard1, Silvain Gerber2, Amélie Rochet-Capellan3.   

Abstract

Direct touch finger interaction on a smartphone or a tablet is now ubiquitous. However, the latency inherent in digital computation produces an average feedback delay of ~ 75 ms between the action of the hand and its visible effect on digital content. This delay has been shown to affect users' performance, but it is unclear whether users adapt to this delay and whether it influences skill learning. Previous work studied adaptation to feedback delays but only for longer delays, with hidden hand or indirect devices. This paper addresses adaptation to touchscreen delay in two empirical studies involving the tracking of a target moving along an elliptical path. Participants were trained for the task either at the minimal delay the system allows (~ 9 ms) or at a longer delay equivalent to commercialized touch devices latencies (75 ms). After 10 training sessions over a minimum of 2 weeks (Experiment 1), participants adapt to the delay. They also display long-term retention 7 weeks after the last training session. This adaptation generalizes to a similar tracking path (e.g., infinity symbol). We also observed generalization of learning from the longer delay to the minimal-delay condition (Experiment 2). The delay thus does not prevent the learning of tracking skill, which suggests that delay adaptation and tracking skill could be two separate components of learning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct touch interaction; Motor adaptation; Motor learning; Tracking; Visual feedback delay

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30191261     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5368-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Adaptation to visual feedback delays in a human manual tracking task.

Authors:  A J Foulkes; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation.

Authors:  Chess Stetson; Xu Cui; P Read Montague; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Stepwise model fitting and statistical inference: turning noise into signal pollution.

Authors:  Roger Mundry; Charles L Nunn
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Feedback and feedforward adaptation to visuomotor delay during reaching and slicing movements.

Authors:  Lior Botzer; Amir Karniel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 6.  Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Predictability is necessary for closed-loop visual feedback delay adaptation.

Authors:  Marieke Rohde; Loes C J van Dam; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.

Authors:  Maurice A Smith; Ali Ghazizadeh; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Eye movements in interception with delayed visual feedback.

Authors:  Clara Cámara; Cristina de la Malla; Joan López-Moliner; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Unlearning versus savings in visuomotor adaptation: comparing effects of washout, passage of time, and removal of errors on motor memory.

Authors:  Tomoko Kitago; Sophia L Ryan; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Aimee D Tomlinson; Rakshith Lokesh; Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Priya Patel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Looking away from a moving target does not disrupt the way in which the movement toward the target is guided.

Authors:  Clara Cámara; Joan López-Moliner; Eli Brenner; Cristina de la Malla
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.