Literature DB >> 24599942

Predictability is necessary for closed-loop visual feedback delay adaptation.

Marieke Rohde1, Loes C J van Dam, Marc O Ernst.   

Abstract

In case of delayed visual feedback during visuomotor tasks, like in some sluggish computer games, humans can modulate their behavior to compensate for the delay. However, opinions on the nature of this compensation diverge. Some studies suggest that humans adapt to feedback delays with lasting changes in motor behavior (aftereffects) and a recalibration of time perception. Other studies have shown little or no evidence for such semipermanent recalibration in the temporal domain. We hypothesize that predictability of the reference signal (target to be tracked) is necessary for semipermanent delay adaptation. To test this hypothesis, we trained participants with a 200 ms visual feedback delay in a visually guided manual tracking task, varying the predictability of the reference signal between conditions, but keeping reference motion and feedback delay constant. In Experiment 1, we focused on motor behavior. Only training in the predictable condition brings about all of the adaptive changes and aftereffects expected from delay adaptation. In Experiment 2, we used a synchronization task to investigate perceived simultaneity (perceptuomotor learning). Supporting the hypothesis, participants recalibrated subjective visuomotor simultaneity only when trained in the predictable condition. Such a shift in perceived simultaneity was also observed in Experiment 3, using an interval estimation task. These results show that delay adaptation in motor control can modulate the perceived temporal alignment of vision and kinesthetically sensed movement. The coadaptation of motor prediction and target prediction (reference extrapolation) seems necessary for such genuine delay adaptation. This offers an explanation for divergent results in the literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feedback delays; manual tracking; predictability; time perception; visuomotor adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24599942     DOI: 10.1167/14.3.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  16 in total

1.  Adaptation to visual feedback delays on touchscreens with hand vision.

Authors:  Elie Cattan; Pascal Perrier; François Bérard; Silvain Gerber; Amélie Rochet-Capellan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Long-term music training modulates the recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity.

Authors:  Crescent Jicol; Michael J Proulx; Frank E Pollick; Karin Petrini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; Raz Leib; Assaf Pressman; Lucia S Simo; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-26

4.  Neglect-Like Effects on Drawing Symmetry Induced by Adaptation to a Laterally Asymmetric Visuomotor Delay.

Authors:  Chen Avraham; Guy Avraham; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Movement-Contingent Time Flow in Virtual Reality Causes Temporal Recalibration.

Authors:  Ambika Bansal; Séamas Weech; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Effects of Human Synchronous Hand Movements in Eliciting a Sense of Agency and Ownership.

Authors:  Qiao Hao; Hiroki Ora; Ken-Ichiro Ogawa; Shun-Ichi Amano; Yoshihiro Miyake
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Auditory dominance in motor-sensory temporal recalibration.

Authors:  Yoshimori Sugano; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing.

Authors:  Yoshimori Sugano; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Decreased Temporal Sensorimotor Adaptation Due to Perturbation-Induced Measurement Noise.

Authors:  Elisabeth B Knelange; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Effects of prolonged exposure to feedback delay on the qualitative subjective experience of virtual reality.

Authors:  Loes C J van Dam; Joey R Stephens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.