| Literature DB >> 30190789 |
Shin Nishio1,2, Koji Matsuo3,4, Koji Yonemoto5, Mototsugu Shimokawa6, Masayuki Hosaka1, Michiko Kodama1, Takahito M Miyake1, Kimio Ushijima2, Toshiharu Kamura2, Shannon N Westin1, Pamela T Soliman1, Robert L Coleman1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with stage IVB cervical cancer pose a significant clinical challenge. While previous studies described several poor prognostic factors, they were limited by small sample sizes. The aim of this study was to identify clinicopathological prognostic factors in a large sample of patients with stage IVB cervical cancer at a single institution.Entities:
Keywords: African-American; cervical cancer; para-aortic chain; prognostic factor; stage IVB
Year: 2018 PMID: 30190789 PMCID: PMC6122357 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Patient characteristics (n=266)
| Factor | No. (%) |
|---|---|
| 50 (27–86) | |
| Caucasian | 150 (56.4) |
| African-American | 44 (16.5) |
| Hispanic | 61 (22.9) |
| Asian | 7 (2.6) |
| Others | 4 (1.6) |
| 6 (2-16) | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 186 (69.9) |
| Adenocarcinoma | 50 (18.8) |
| Neuroendocrine | 17 (6.4) |
| Unclassified | 13 (4.9) |
| Well | 15 (5.6) |
| Moderate | 67 (25.2) |
| Poorly | 137 (51.5) |
| Unclassified | 47 (17.7) |
| Right | 30(11.3) |
| Left | 20(8.8) |
| Bilateral | 39(14.7) |
| None | 177(65.2) |
| IB1 | 9 (3.4) |
| IB2 | 48 (18) |
| IIA | 16 (6) |
| IIB | 55 (20.7) |
| IIIA | 13 (4.9) |
| IIIB | 103 (38.7) |
| IVA | 22 (8.3) |
| Brain | 1 |
| Lung | 60 |
| Liver | 30 |
| Spleen | 2 |
| Abdominal wall | 8 |
| Navel | 2 |
| Omentum | 12 |
| Vulva | 2 |
| Bone | 15 |
| Neck | 10 |
| Supraclavicular | 39 |
| Mediastinum | 4 |
| Axilla | 4 |
| Intraperitoneal/para-aortic (para-aortic alone) | 138 (91) |
| Inguinal | 26 |
*Duplicated cases included.
FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier curve showing overall survival in 266 patients with stage IVB cervical cancer
Initial treatment (n=266)
| Treatment | No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Hysterectomy+pelvic lymphadenectomy | |
| Radiotherapy alone | 72 |
| Concurrent chemoradiotherapy | 109 |
| Carboplatin/paclitaxel | 41 |
| Cisplatin/topotecan | 6 |
| Cisplatin/etoposide | 5 |
| Cisplatin/pemetrexed | 4 |
| Cisplatin/paclitaxel | 3 |
| Cisplatin/gemcitabine | 2 |
| Cisplatin | 1 |
| Paclitaxel/topotecan | 3 |
| Paclitaxel/bevacizumab | 3 |
| Topotecan | 1 |
| Docetaxel | 1 |
| Regorafenib | 1 |
| Cediranib | 1 |
Cox regression analysis of factors influencing overall survival
| Factor | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | Hazard Ratio | 95% CI | |||
| 0.96 | 0.73–1.27 | 0.7841 | 0.79 | 0.59-1.08 | 0.7893 | |
| 1.33 | 0.93–1.95 | 0.1176 | ||||
| 1.36 | 0.76–2.45 | 0.3002 | 0.88 | 0.49-1.74 | 0.6968 | |
| 1.15 | 0.87–1.53 | 0.3212 | 1.04 | 0.78-1.40 | 0.7893 | |
| 0.83 | 0.62–1.12 | 0.2248 | 0.90 | 0.69-1.32 | 0.7414 | |
| 1.29 | 0.95–1.73 | 0.0996 | 1.02 | 0.70–1.48 | 0.9128 | |
| 1.35 | 0.94–1.90 | 0.1036 | ||||
CI, confidence interval.
Difference in initial treatment
| Treatment | Para-aortic lymph node metastasis (n=91) | Other types of metastasis (n=175) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiotherapy alone | 30 | 42 |
| Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy | 56 | 53 |
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier curve showing overall survival in patients with para-aortic lymph-node metastasis versus those with other metastases
Red line, para-aortic lymph-node metastasis group; blue line, other metastases group.
Figure 3Study selection schema
*MDACC: MD Anderson Cancer Center. $Key word: metastatic × cervical cancer. #Non-stage IVB (e.g. recurrent cases). ##Incomplete medical records.