Literature DB >> 29605048

Racial and ethnic disparities over time in the treatment and mortality of women with gynecological malignancies.

J Alejandro Rauh-Hain1, Alexander Melamed2, Diego Schaps3, Amy J Bregar2, Ryan Spencer4, John O Schorge2, Laurel W Rice4, Marcela G Del Carmen5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine temporal trends in treatment and survival among black, Asian, Hispanic, and white women diagnosed with endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancer.
METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2014), we identified women diagnosed with endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar cancer. For each disease site, we analyzed race/ethnicity-specific trends in receipt of evidence-based practices. Professional societies' recommendations were used to define these practices. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (2000-2009) we analyzed trends in 5-year survival.
RESULTS: Throughout the study period black (64.8%) and Hispanic (68.3%) women were less likely to undergo lymphadenectomy for stage I ovarian cancer compared to Asian (79.5%) and white patients (74.6%). Black women were the least likely group to undergo lymphadenectomy in all periods. Among patients with stage II-IV ovarian cancer, 76.6% of white and Asian women received both surgery and chemotherapy, compared to 70.8% of black and 73.9% Hispanic women. Hispanic women with deeply invasive or high-grade stage I endometrial cancer underwent lymphadenectomy less frequently (74.5%) than all other groups (80.7%). Black women were less likely to have chemo-radiotherapy for stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer (75.6% versus 80.4% of all others). Black women were also less likely to have a surgical lymph node evaluation for vulvar cancer (58.8% versus 63.5% of all others). Among women diagnosed with ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer, black women had lower five-year survival than other groups.
CONCLUSION: Significant racial disparities persist in the delivery of evidence-based care. Black women with ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer continue to experience higher cancer-specific mortality than other groups.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29605048     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  11 in total

1.  Patient-Level Factors Associated With Lack of Health Care Provider Recommendation for the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Among Young Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Jocelyn M York; James L Klosky; Yanjun Chen; James A Connelly; Karen Wasilewski-Masker; Anna R Giuliano; Leslie L Robison; F Lennie Wong; Melissa M Hudson; Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Evaluating the urban-rural paradox: The complicated relationship between distance and the receipt of guideline-concordant care among cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa P Spees; Stephanie B Wheeler; Mahesh Varia; Morris Weinberger; Christopher D Baggett; Xi Zhou; Victoria M Petermann; Wendy R Brewster
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Too many women are dying from cervix cancer: Problems and solutions.

Authors:  David K Gaffney; Mia Hashibe; Deanna Kepka; Kathryn A Maurer; Theresa L Werner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Guideline-concordant treatment is associated with improved survival among women with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jhalak Dholakia; Elyse Llamocca; Allison Quick; Ritu Salani; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Socioeconomic inequality and omission of adjuvant radiation therapy in high-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Leo Y Luo; Emeline M Aviki; Anna Lee; Marisa A Kollmeier; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; C Jillian Tsai; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Race and nodal disease status are prognostic factors in patients with stage IVB cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shin Nishio; Koji Matsuo; Koji Yonemoto; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Masayuki Hosaka; Michiko Kodama; Takahito M Miyake; Kimio Ushijima; Toshiharu Kamura; Shannon N Westin; Pamela T Soliman; Robert L Coleman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-08-17

7.  Guideline-adherent treatment, sociodemographic disparities, and cause-specific survival for endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Victoria E Rodriguez; Alana M W LeBrón; Jenny Chang; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 8.  Brief introduction of medical database and data mining technology in big data era.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Yuanjie Li; Qingqing Liu; Li Li; Aozi Feng; Tianyi Wang; Shuai Zheng; Anding Xu; Jun Lyu
Journal:  J Evid Based Med       Date:  2020-02-22

Review 9.  Race as a Contributor to Stromal Modulation of Tumor Progression.

Authors:  Mamatha Kakarla; Sathyavathi ChallaSivaKanaka; Simon W Hayward; Omar E Franco
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Mixed and nonvaccine high risk HPV types are associated with higher mortality in Black women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Rachelle P Mendoza; Tahmineh Haidary; Elmer Gabutan; Ying Yin Zhou; Zaheer Bukhari; Courtney Connelly; Wen-Ching Lee; Yi-Chun Lee; Raj Wadgaonkar; Raag Agrawal; M A Haseeb; Raavi Gupta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.